1/54
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
psychopathology
a significant disturbance in cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior that indicates a dysfunction in mental functioning
-usually associated with a significant distress or disability in work, relationships, or other areas of functioning
Jerome Wakefield’s view of psychopathology
harmful dysfunction theory: a theory of psychopathology stating that the definition of disorder should include aspects of harmfulness (which is more socially determined) and dysfunction (which is more scientifically determined).
Who is involved in the creation of the diagnostic categories in the DSM?
-task force
-published by American Psychiatric Association
-follows a medical model of psychopathology
-each disorder defined categorically and features list of specific symptoms
DSM I (1952) and II (1968)
-very similar in content
-only 3 broad categories of disorders:
psychoses (schizophrenia)
neuroses (depression, bipolar, anxiety disorders)
character disorders (personality disorders)
-psychoanalytic
-did not provide diagnostic criteria
-not empirically based
DSM-III (1980)
-relied on empirical data to determine which disorders to include and how to define them
-specific diagnostic criteria to define disorders
-atheoretical
-much longer/more extensive: 265 new disorders added
-introduced multiaxial system (dropped in DSM-5)
DSM IV (2000) retained most of these major changes
DSM-5 (2013) and DSM-5-TR (2022)
-first substantial revision in 20 years
-Task Force: hundreds of experts from over 12 countries
-Work Groups: composed of experts, each focused on particular area of mental disorders (eg eating disorders)
-scientific review committee separate from work group
-Field trials
-communication with WHO, who publishes International Classification of Diseases (ICD)
Changes DSM-5 didn’t make
-initially considered emphasizing biological roots of mental disorders (gene analysis, blood tests)
-dimensional approach considered but ultimately rejected
-proposed disorders that didn’t make it: internet gaming disorder, nonsuicidal self injury disorder
new features in DSM-5
-DSM5 not DSM V (enables updates like 5.1, 5.2)
-eliminated multiaxial system
-disorders thought to be short term no longer listed on separate axis than those thought to persist long term
-elimination of Axis V (global assessment of functioning)
New disorders in DSM-5
-Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD)
-Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder (DMDD)
Essentially frequent temper tantrums in children 6-18 years old
At least 3 tantrums per week over a year-long period
Tantrums are clearly below expected level of maturity
Occur in at least two settings (e.g., school, home)
Irritable or angry mood between tantrums
-Binge Eating Disorder (BED)
-Hoarding Disorder
Major Revisions in DSM-5
bereavement exclusion was dropped for major depressive
episode
Ensures that people in mourning who are suffering from
depression will be recognized, diagnosed, and receive prompt
treatment
Diagnoses of autistic disorder and Asperger’s disorder were
combined into a single diagnosis: autism spectrum disorder
Represent various points on the same spectrum of
impairment—mild, moderate, or severe versions of the same
problem
The two separate DSM-IV diagnoses of substance abuse
and substance dependence were combined into
substance use disorder
Previously, tolerance and withdrawal linked solely with
dependence—research has demonstrated this is not true
Mental retardation was renamed intellectual disability
In DSM-5-TR, it was again re-named to Intellectual
Developmental Disorder
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder was removed from the
Anxiety Disorders category and placed in its own new
category (along with related diagnoses)
Mood Disorders were split into two separate categories:
Depressive Disorders and Bipolar and Related Disorders
DSM-5-TR changes
Prolonged Grief Disorder was added as a diagnosis
Suicidal Behavior and Nonsuicidal Self-Injury were
added to the proposed criteria sets/conditions for further
study section
Criticisms of DSM-5 an d DSM-5 TR
-diagnostic overexpansion: concern that diagnoses take difficult or inopportune life experiences and label them as mental illnesses
-transparency of the revision process: critics argue that DSM5 authors too vague and selective about what they shared and too many decisions made behind closed doors
-memberships of the work groups: those invited were predominantly researchers, concerns about clinical utility
-price: DSM-IV sold for $65 in 1994
DSM-5 had a list price of $199 (hardback) when it was first
released
DSM-5-TR is listed at $220 (hardback)
general DSM criticisms
Controversial Cutoffs
Seemingly arbitrary requirement of a certain number of
symptoms/certain time period
E.g., why a minimum of 5 symptoms for MDD? Why for two
weeks?
Cultural Issues
Many steps have been taken to consider culture in the DSM, but
criticisms remain
Original creators of DSM were not diverse (primarily White and
male)
Much of the research it is based on comes from homogeneous
samples
Potential gender bias
Some disorders are diagnosed far more frequently in men, some are diagnosed more frequently in women
Are some disorders biased toward pathologizing one gender more than the other?
Nonempirical influences
At times politics and public opinion may have influenced DSM
E.g., the changing status of homosexuality—an official disorder
in DSM-I and DSM-II, but absent from the manual since a
revision of the DSM-III
assessment techniques should posses
reliability, validity, utility
Case History
• Detailed description of a client’s background
• Often provides information necessary to make a diagnosis or determine
necessity of treatment
•What information is typically gathered?
• Birth and Development
• Complications during pregnancy, normative developmental milestones
• Family of Origin
• Who was the client raised by? Is the family still intact?
• Relationships with parents, siblings, etc.
• Family history of mental health problems (e.g., drug and alcohol abuse), etc.
• Education History
• Highest level of education obtained
• Learning disorders, special education services
• Significant behavioral problems (e.g., suspensions, expulsions)
• Employment History
• What types of jobs has client held
• History of being fired, changing jobs frequently
• Recreation/Leisure
• How client spends free time; hobbies and interests
• Sexual History
• Sexual functioning
• Relationship History
• When client began dating
• Significant romantic relationships
• Alcohol and Drugs
• Pattern of use of alcohol and drugs
• Any legal, employment, or social problems due to use?
• Physical Health
• Significant medical problems (e.g., head injuries, chronic illnesses)
• Allergies
• Other considerations
• Also gives the clinician the opportunity to make observations about
the client’s speech pattern, thought processes, ability to regulate
their emotions, etc.
• Gathering collateral information can be important
• E.g., when working with a child, asking parents, teachers, etc. for
information
General skills and interviewer should have
-quieting yourself
-being self-aware
-ability to develop positive working relationship
specific interviewing behaviors
• Eye contact—both facilitates and communicates listening
• Keep in mind this can be dependent on culture (i.e., some cultures may view it as rude to make prolonged eye contact)
• Body language
• Vocal qualities
• Verbal tracking I.e., repeating key words and phrases that clients use and weaving them into your own speech and questions
• Referring to the client by the proper name
rapport
• A positive, comfortable relationship between interviewer and client
• Typically leads to client disclosing more information
• How can this be accomplished?
• Remember that the first visit to a clinical psychologist is often
intimidating
• Follow the client’s lead
directive technique
questions targeted towards gathering specific information
nondirective technique
allows the client to guide the course of the interview
open-ended questions
Open-ended questions allow for individualized and spontaneous
responses from clients
• E.g., “What has your experience of depression been like?”
• Consistent with nondirective interview style
closed-ended questions
• Closed-ended questions allow for less elaboration and self-
expression by the client, but yield precise answers
• E.g., “Have you been hospitalized for depression in the past?”
• Consistent with directive interview style
active listening techniques
Clarification
• The purpose of a clarification question is to make sure the
interviewer has an accurate understanding of the client’s
comments
• Also communicates that the interviewer is actively listening
Confrontation
• Used when an interviewer notices discrepancies or
inconsistencies in a client’s comments
Paraphrasing
• Used to assure clients that they are being heard—not to clarify or
resolve contradictions
• A rephrasing of the content of the client’s message
Reflection of feeling
• Echoes the client’s emotions—intended to make the client feel that their emotions are being recognized
• Often involves the interviewer making an inference
Summarizing
• Typically involves tying together various topics that may have been discussed and identifying themes that have recurred
pragmatics of the interview
Note taking:
• Should an interviewer take notes during an interview?
• There are many different approaches—no consensus on what’s best
• Different job settings may have different expectations
• E.g., some require concurrent documentation
• It’s always a good idea to explain to clients why you are taking notes
Audio and video recording
• Requires written permission from client
• Can potentially hinder rapport/openness
The interview room
• Clients tend to prefer comfortable, neat rooms
• E.g., with soft lighting, comfortable furniture, art on the wall
• Clinical psychologists typically steer clear of overtly personal items (e.g., family photos)
intake interviews
Essentially to determine whether to “intake” the client—whether
the client needs treatment and what type of treatment
Diagnostic Interviews
• The purpose is to diagnose the client
• At the end, the interviewer should be able to assign DSM
diagnosis/diagnoses
structured diagnostic interview
a predetermined, planned sequence of questions that an interviewer asks a client
• Provide a diagnosis based explicitly on DSM criteria
• Tend to be more highly reliable
• Format is typically rigid—can inhibit rapport
• Don’t typically allow for inquiries such as relationship issues,
personal history, etc.
• Tend to be fairly lengthy
unstructured diagnostic interview
no predetermined or planned questions—
interviewers instead improvise based on what they believe is relevant during the interview
most prominent structured interview
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders SCID
Mental Status Exam
• Most often used in medical settings—assesses how the client is functioning at the time of the evaluation
• Areas typically assessed in a Mental Status Exam (MSE)
General Appearance and Behavior
• Gait, posture, dress, personal hygiene, level of activity
Speech and Thought
• Is client’s speech coherent? Is the client’s speech pressured (i.e., does it seem that the client is having a difficult time speaking fast enough to express his/her thoughts?)
• Evidence of delusional thinking?
Consciousness
• Is client alert, attentive?
Perception
• Evidence of hallucinations?
Memory
• Ability to accurately recall events from past (e.g., names of parents, place of birth)
• Recent memory—assessed by asking about knowledge of current events
• Short-term memory—often assessed by asking the client to remember the names of three items
and checking his/her recall later in the assessment
Affect and Mood
Orientation to person, place, and time
crisis interview
• Special type of clinical interview that is designed to assess a
problem demanding urgent attention (most often clients
considering suicide or harming others) and provide immediate
intervention
• Must quickly establish rapport, express empathy for crisis
• When assessing suicidality, must take into account five
specific issues:
• How depressed is the client?
• Does the client have suicidal thoughts?
• Does the client have a suicide plan?
• How much self-control does the client currently appear to have?
• Does the client have definite suicidal intentions?
intelligence tests
measure a client’s intellectual abilities
achievement tests
measure what a client has accomplished with those intellectual abilities
hierarchal model of intelligence
specific abilities (s) exist and are important, but they are all at least somewhat related to one another and to a global, overall intelligence (g)
-Spearman and Thurstone
common Wechsler subtests
Vocabulary: orally explain the meaning of a word
Similarities: orally explain how two things or concepts are alike
Information: orally answer questions focusing on specific items of general knowledge
Comprehension: orally answer questions about general social principles and social situations
Block Design: re-create a specific patter or design of colored blocks
Picture Completion: View picture of a simple object or scene and identify the important part that is missing
Matrix Reasoning: View an incomplete matrix and select the missing portion from multiple choices provided
Coding: using a pencil and paper, repeatedly copy simple shapes/symbols in appropriate spaces according to key provided
Digit Span: individual is given a string of numbers (7-8-3) and must repeat them back
Letter-Number Sequencing: the examiner presents a combination of letters and numbers, the individual must repeat first the numbers in order from smallest to largest, followed by letters in alphabetical order
Wechsler vs Stanford Binet
Similarities
-both are administered one on one and face to face
-both employ hierarchical model of intelligence
-same mean (100) and standard deviation (15)
-great psychometric properties (i.e. strong validity and reliability)
Differences
-Stanford-Binet covers the entire lifespan (2-85)
-Stanford-Binet includes normative data from individuals with specific disorders
-Stanford-Binet subtests each have greater number of very easy and very difficult items (better at assessing the extremes)
Tests of Achievement
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test
-comprehensive achievement test for 4 to 50 years
-administered face-to-face, one-on-one
-measures achievement in reading, math, written language, and oral language
-mean of 100, SD 15
Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Battery HRB
-Full battery of eight standardized tests
-Trail-making tests, finger oscillation test
Bender Gestalt test
-most commonly used neuropsychological screen
-straightforward copying task: client is given pencil, paper, nine simple geometric designs and asked to copy each design as accurately as possible
objective personality tests
-unambiguous tests items
-offers clients a limited range of responses
-objectively scored
projective personality tests
-less structured (items ambiguous)
-responses are open ended and involve a greater degree of judgement in scoring and interpretation
MMPI
-most popular and psychometrically sound personality assessment
-initially consisted of 550 self-descriptive sentences
-mark true/false
development of the MMPI (1943)
-Starke Hathaway and J.C. McKinley
-emphasis on constructing an empirical measure
-empirical criterion keying: identifying distinct groups of people, asking them all to respond to the same tests items, and comparing responses between groups to select items that yield different patterns of responses between groups
-not theoretical
MMPI Validity Scales
provide information about how the client approached the test and allows psychologists to determine if the test is valid (if participants are “faking good” or “faking bad”
MMPI-2
-normative data obtained from much larger, more diverse group
-some items removed/revised that had outdated or awkward wording
MMPI-A
Ages 14 to 18 years
Published in 1992
Similar in administration, scoring, and interpretation to
MMPI-2
MMPI-2-RF and MMPI-3
MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF)
Released in 2008, shorter version of MMPI-2
Contains only 338 of the (over 550) MMPI-2 items
Restructured Clinical Scales
Close to the 10 Clinical Scales of earlier versions
Removal of items that overlapped between scales
Separate scale created for demoralization
Omission of Masculinity-Femininity Scale and Social
Introversion Scale
Addition of PSY-5 Scales—correspond to personality
disorders
MMPI-3 was also recently released (2020)
335-item self-report measure
criticisms of the MMPI
-too lengthy and time consuming
-requires reading ability and prolonged attention
-focuses on forms of psychopathology as the factors that make up personality
Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory IV
-similar to MMPI, stronger emphasis on personality disorders
-separate clinical scales for each disorder
-1977 Theodore Millon
-195 tr/false items
-identify personality disorders
Rorschach Inkblot
Hermann Rorschach—created the Inkblot Method in
1921
10 inkblots
Administration occurs in 2 phases
Response or Free Association Phase
Inquiry Phase
Not published with a scoring method
Rorschach died about a year after publishing the
measure
Comprehensive System for Inkblots
John Exner combined aspects of scoring systems to create the
Comprehensive System
Includes normative data collected from thousands of children and adults
A small sample of variables considered in scoring:
Location—does the response involve the whole inkblot, a large portion of it, or just a small detail?
Determinants
Form Quality
Popular
Content
The way a client makes sense of the inkblot parallels the way they make sense of the world
Psychometric issues
Thematic Apperception Test
Involves presenting the client with a series of cards,
each with an ambiguous picture
TAT cards feature interpersonal scenes
Client must create a story to go along with the scene
Includes 31 cards, but typically not all are used
Often analyzed without formal scoring
TAT interpretation is often more of an art than a science
Sentence Completion Tests
Ambiguous stimuli are the beginnings of sentences
Assumption that the client’s personality is revealed by the
endings they add
Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank (RISB) tests are most
widely known and commonly used
NEO Personality Inventory
a personality measure that assesses common, non-disordered personality characteristics
-OCEAN big 5 factors are primary scales
Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test
language free test that requires no speaking or shared understanding of language
-intelligence measured through hand gestures, pointing, object manipulation