Basics of Research Methods 1-10

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 3 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/87

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

88 Terms

1
New cards

Experimental Design

Helps us to determine causality (cause and effect)

2
New cards

Standardization

Everything in the experiment stays the same.

3
New cards

Between-Subject Design

 Different participants test each condition. One group does Condition A, a completely different group does Condition B .

4
New cards

Within-Subjects Design

The same participants undergo all conditions. The same person does Condition A, then later does Condition B .

5
New cards

Carryover

The effect of the first condition is still there.  (e.g., the alcohol from Condition 1 is still in their system during Condition 2).

6
New cards

Pre-test Sensitization

Taking the test early might tip the participant off to what the study is about, changing their behavior.

7
New cards

Factorial Design

Using two or more independent variables at the same time. E.g. alcohol AND gender

8
New cards

Experimenter Bias

 The researcher’s own gender, race, or expectations can unintentionally influence the data.

9
New cards

Demand Characteristics

Participants figure out the hypothesis (cues in the room, instructions) and try to be "good subjects" by acting how they think they should.

10
New cards

Matched Pairs

A solution for Between-Subjects designs where participants are paired based on specific traits (like age or weight) to ensure groups are equal, rather than relying solely on randomization

11
New cards

Counterbalancing Effect

A solution for Within-Subjects designs to prevent order effects. Half the participants perform the conditions in one order (A then B), and the other half do the reverse (B then A).

12
New cards

Placebo Effect

When a participant improves simply because they believe they received effective treatment, even if they received a fake one

13
New cards

Double-Blind Experiment

An experiment where neither the participant nor the researcher knows who is receiving the real treatment vs. the placebo. This prevents researcher bias and placebo effects.

14
New cards

Population

The entire group you want to observe and draw conclusions for. (e.g., "All university students in Hungary").

15
New cards

Sample

Selected from the units

16
New cards

Representative Sample

A sample that accurately reflects the demographics (age, gender, ethnicity) of the population.

17
New cards

Random Sampling

A method where every member of the population has an equal chance of being picked. This is the best way to get a representative sample.

18
New cards

Direct Observation

Watching and recording behavior objectively (e.g., with a stopwatch or camera).

19
New cards

Observer Effect

People act differently when being watched.

20
New cards

Observer Bias

Researchers see what they expect to see

21
New cards

Questionnaires / Surveys

Participants self-report their attitudes or behaviors.

22
New cards

Social Desirability Bias

People fake good to look better.

23
New cards

Psychological Tests

Standardized measures of traits (e.g., IQ, personality).

24
New cards

Case Studies

In-depth investigation of a single individual. Might be hard to generalize the findings.

25
New cards

Mean

The average

26
New cards

Median

The middle score

27
New cards

Mode

The most frequent score

28
New cards

Variability

How spread out is the data.

29
New cards

Correlation Coefficient (r)

Measures the strength of a relationship between two variables. Can be Positive or Negative. It does not imply CAUSATION.

30
New cards

Induction

Moving from specific Data (observations) to form a general Theory.

31
New cards

Deduction

Moving from a general Theory to specific Hypotheses (predictions) that can be tested with data.

32
New cards

Theory / Թեորեմ

 A system of interrelated ideas used to explain a set of observations. A good theory must be testable. Sleep facilitates the consolidation of memory

33
New cards

Hypotheses

A specific, tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a prediction from a theory.

34
New cards

Variable

Any measurable condition, event, characteristic, or behavior that is controlled or observed in a study.

35
New cards

Identify the Research Question

Start with an initial observation or question.

36
New cards

Formulate a Hypotheses

Translate a theory into a testable prediction. You must define variables clearly (Operational Definition).

37
New cards

Select Research Design

Choose the method (Experiment, Case Study, Survey, etc.).

38
New cards

Data Collection

Start the study and gather information.

39
New cards

Analyze Data

Use statistics to interpret the results.

40
New cards

Publication

Report findings in a scientific journal for peer review.

41
New cards

Replication

Other researchers try to repeat the study to see if the results hold true.

42
New cards

Correlational / Descriptive Research Design

describing behavior or finding links between variables (e.g., Case Studies, Surveys, Naturalistic Observation).

43
New cards

Experimental Research Design

Manipulating a variable to see if it causes a change in another.

44
New cards

Independent Variable

The variable you change/manipulate.

45
New cards

Dependent Variable

The variable you measure (the outcome)

46
New cards

Experimental Group

The ones that get the treatment,

47
New cards

Control Group

The ones that do not get the treatment (for comparison)

48
New cards

Psychological Ethics

Moral principles guiding a psychologist’s general conduct or practice.

49
New cards

Research Ethics

Moral principles specifically guiding researchers from the start to the end of a study.

50
New cards

Ethical Dilemma

A conflict between different principles of moral conduct.

51
New cards

Ethical Codes

Principles, requiring researchers to consider circumstances (a "no harm" approach). Two people can interpret a situation differently and still be ethical.

52
New cards

Maximizing Benefit, Minimising Harm

Research must serve a beneficial purpose while avoiding harm to participants, whether social, financial, or psychological.

53
New cards

Respect for people’s rights, autonomy, and dignity

Researchers must respect participants' privacy, autonomy, and diversity (age, gender, culture). They must avoid biases and clearly explain the aim and procedures.

54
New cards

Scientfic Value

Research must contribute to knowledge. Poorly designed research is unethical because it is a waste of resources

55
New cards

Integrity (բարեվարքություն)

Researchers must be honest, accurate, and trustworthy.

56
New cards

Justice

Everyone should have equal access to the benefits of psychology, no biases.

57
New cards

Informed Consent

An agreement to participate in research with full knowledge of the context and the participant's rights.

58
New cards

Anonymity

No personal data (names, birthdates) is collected. The participant cannot be identified.

59
New cards

Confidentiality

Data is collected but kept private and not published in an identifiable way.

60
New cards

Voluntary Participation

Participants can refuse to take part or withdraw at any stage, even after the research is finished.

61
New cards

Deception

The act of convincing of one or many recipients of untrue information.

62
New cards

Naturalistic Observation

form of involuntary participation where subjects are observed in their natural environment without knowing it. It is ethical only if they cannot be identified and the information is public.

63
New cards

Debriefing

The process of informing participants after a study about its true purpose, methods, and any deception used.

64
New cards

Physiognomy

The early, unscientific practice of judging a person's character or personality based solely on their outward appearance (face, body).

65
New cards

Phrenology

The pseudoscience claiming that "bumps" on the skull correspond to specific brain functions and personality traits.

66
New cards

James McKeen Cattell

The psychologist who coined the term "Mental Test" and emphasized the need for large sample sizes to get accurate data.

67
New cards

Alfred Binet

He moved testing away from sensory tasks (reaction time) to "Higher Mental Processes" (reasoning/judgment) to identify children with learning difficulties.

68
New cards

Army Alpha

The group intelligence test designed for literate soldiers during WWI.

69
New cards

Army Beta

The group intelligence test designed for illiterate or non-English speaking soldiers during WWI (using mazes/pictures).

70
New cards

Woodworth Personal Data Sheet

The first formal personality test, designed to screen WWI soldiers for "shell shock" (emotional instability)

<p>The first formal personality test, designed to screen WWI soldiers for "shell shock" (emotional instability)</p>
71
New cards

Projective Tests

Assessments like the Rorschach or TAT that use ambiguous stimuli (inkblots, pictures) to reveal unconscious conflicts and motives.

72
New cards

Rorschach test

Projective psychological test where people describe what they see in inkblots, revealing hidden thoughts and emotions.

73
New cards

Thematic Apperception Test (TAT

Shows people pictures and asks them to make up stories, which reveal their underlying motives, feelings, and conflicts.

74
New cards

Big Five (OCEAN)

The five main dimensions of personality: Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism.

75
New cards

Chronological Age

Actual age

76
New cards

Mental Age

The age level at which an individual performs intellectually.

77
New cards

Authority

Believing something because an "expert" or figure of power said so (teachers, parents, politicians).

78
New cards

Empiricism

Learning through direct observation and experience.

79
New cards

Confirmation Bias

The tendency to seek out and focus on information that supports one’s existing beliefs, while ignoring or discounting contradictory evidence.

80
New cards

Belief Perseverance

The tendency to stubbornly hold on to a belief even when strong counter-evidence shows it to be false.

81
New cards

Availability Heuristics

A mental shortcut where people judge how likely or common something is based on how easily examples come to mind.

82
New cards

Anchoring Heuristics

The First information we have about the case determines our views and thinking on the case.

83
New cards

Post-Hoc

84
New cards
85
New cards

Objectivity

Representing real truth despite your opinion.

86
New cards

Determinism

The scientific assumption that events (and human behavior) have logical causes and do not just happen randomly.

87
New cards

Discoverability

The belief that we can actually find and understand these causes using scientific methods.

88
New cards

Pseudopsychology

Any claim or practice that looks scientific (uses jargon) but lacks evidence, reliable methods, or scientific support.