1/3
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
strengths of classical conditioning & pavlov’s research
Both Pavlov and Skinner base their theories based on empirical evidence from controlled lab experiments
Confounding variables are controlled - same amount of food, level of hunger controlled by keeping animals at 90% body weight
High reliability, internal validity and scientific credibility, objective measurement
Real world application - phobia treatments
Phobia treatments such as SD and flooding use the theories of behavioural conditioning to treat phobias using
Gilroy et al. (2003)
Behavioural approaches explain the onset and maintenance of phobias (Mowrer 1947)
weaknesses of classical conditioning & pavlov’s research
Animal studies cannot be generalised to humans - low external validity when comparing to human behaviours
Ethical doubts as if behavioural conditioning is taken too far/is too radical, then it can pose threat to individuality and free will - could lean towards fascist tendencies
However, the behavioural approach forms the basis of the learning theory of attachment, yet has been disproven by psychologists such as Bowlby
Behavioural approach also assumes that cognitive approaches are irrelevant
Behavioural approaches focus significantly on the nurture side of the nature vs. nurture debate
Behavioural approaches suffer from environmental reductionism - everything is stimulus response - too over-simplified to explain the complexities of humans
Behavioural approaches are environmentally deterministic - everything we do has been trained in by conditioning
skinner’s research (1953)
Skinner (1953) suggested that learning is an active process whereby humans and animals operate upon their environment
Skinner identified three types of operant:
Neutral operant
Environmental forces that neither increase nor decrease the repetition of a specific behaviour
Reinforcers
Environmental forces that increase the repetition of a specific behaviour
A positive reinforcer is a behaviour which is repeated to enjoy the pleasant consequences
A negative reinforcer is a behaviour which is repeated to avoid unpleasant consequences
Punishers
Environmental forces that decrease the repetition of a specific behaviour
skinner box
Skinner placed one rat at a time inside the box
Each box contained different stimuli, including a lever that released food (the rat’s reward) and an electroplated floor (the rat’s punishment)
Positive reinforcement was demonstrated by placing a hungry rat in the box
The box contained a lever which the rat initially accidentally triggered as it explored the box
Upon triggering the lever a food pellet was delivered (reward)
The rats quickly learned to go straight to the lever
The consequence/reward (food) of pressing the lever saw them repeating the action over and over again
Negative reinforcement was demonstrated by placing a rat in the box and then subjecting it to an unpleasant electric shock (punishment)
The rat initially accidentally triggered the lever as it explored the box
Upon triggering the lever, the electric current was switched off (unpleasant sensations stopped)
The rats quickly learned to trigger the lever immediately as soon as they were placed in the box
The consequence/reward of escaping the electric shock saw them repeating the action over and over again