Comapartive Elections Final POLS 3333 Asher Lubotzky UofH

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/29

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

30 Terms

1
New cards

What is identity politics?

-Political or social activity by or on behalf of a racial, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender, or other group

- Aims to rectify injustices linked to identity differences or misconceptions

- May be both left-wing and right-wing

2
New cards

How does identity politics influence voting?

- Preference to vote for a party or candidate based on shared identity

- Not necessarily based on policy positions or political views

3
New cards

Why can identity politics be criticized?

- Encourages polarization and tribalism

- Marginalizes smaller/mixed identities

- Reduces voting based on policy

- Can be exploited by politicians

4
New cards

What is the incumbency advantage?

- Higher chance of reelection due to:

- Name recognition

- Fundraising advantages

- Access to state resources

- Local networks

- Party support

- (Sometimes) gerrymandering

5
New cards

What has recently challenged the incumbency advantage?

- Major crises (e.g., COVID-19)

- Rise of new media

- Growth of populism

6
New cards

Why is election financing both good and bad?

Good: Enables competition and voter choice

Bad: Wealth can dominate politics, leading to inequality and corruption

7
New cards

What are democracy vouchers?

- Publicly funded vouchers given to citizens to donate to candidates of their choice

- Designed to promote small donations and political equality

8
New cards

Private Funding: pros and cons

Private:

Pros: People can decide themselves who they want to support, Link btw party and base

Cons: Corporations and wealthy gain more influence

9
New cards

Public Funding: pros and cons

Pros: Easier to monitor/regulate and if done well gives more people a chace while preventing corruption and promotion fair interests

Cons: Can be a waste of money often see abuse of funds by ruling parties, limiting parties freedom to engage in elections

10
New cards

What are common ways to rig an election?

- Manipulating voter registration

- Gerrymandering

- Electoral fraud

- Misuse of public resources

- Suppressing opposition media

11
New cards

What is democratic backsliding?

- Gradual decline in the quality of democracy

- Includes undermining free elections, checks and balances, and civil liberties

12
New cards

What is an example of successful ethnic pluralism in elections?

Indonesia: Created broad-based, multiethnic parties after conflict by setting strong party registration rules​

13
New cards

What is an example of a confessionalist system?

Lebanon: Power-sharing among religious groups:

President: Maronite Christian

Prime Minister: Sunni Muslim

Speaker of Parliament: Shiite Muslim​

14
New cards

What is the Muhasasa system in Iraq?

Informal sectarian division of government positions by ethnicity/religion after 2003​

15
New cards

What is the difference between MMP and MMM?

MMP (Mixed-Member Proportional): Combines proportional and majoritarian systems; proportional "corrects" majoritarian results.

MMM (Mixed-Member Majoritarian): Both proportional and majoritarian votes count separately; no correcting mechanism.

16
New cards

What are the main types of electoral systems?

Majoritarian/Plurality: First-past-the-post (e.g., U.S.)

Proportional Representation (PR): Seats distributed based on vote share

Mixed Systems: Combine elements of both

3 multiple choice options

17
New cards

What is proportional representation (PR)?

An electoral system where parties gain seats in proportion to the number of votes they receive

18
New cards

How does Lebanon's electoral system manage religion?

Seats in Parliament are divided according to religious identity (confessional quotas)

After 2017: Moved to a PR system but still strongly linked to sectarian identities​

19
New cards

What was the Taif Agreement?

1989 deal ending the Lebanese Civil War

Shifted Lebanon from presidential to semi-presidential system

Adjusted Christian-Muslim seat ratio to 50:50​

20
New cards

Proportional Representation Panels

- Netherlands

- Sweden

- Portugal

- Spain

21
New cards

First Past the Post Panel

- UK

- Canada

- Jamaica

- Zambia

22
New cards

Mixed Member Electoral Panel

- Germany

- New Zeland

- Hungary

- South Korea

23
New cards

Majoritarian Runoff Panel

- France

- Chile

- Colombia

24
New cards

Dominant Party Panel

- South Africa

- Russia

- Botswana

- Singapore

25
New cards

Frequent Electoral Reform Panel

- Italy

- Japan

- Poland

- Ukraine

26
New cards

Electoral CHallenges in Presidential System

- Nigeria

- Kenya

- Democratic Republic of Congo

- Mozambique

27
New cards

Electoral Quotas for Minotiry Representation

- Rwanda

- Morocco

- Nepal

- Tunisia

28
New cards

Post-Conflict Electoral System

- Bosnia and Herzegovnia

- Northern Ireland

- Iraq

- Lebanon

29
New cards

Descriptive representation

Representatives share the same identity characteristics (race, gender, religion, etc.) as their constituents.

30
New cards

Substantive representation

Representatives advocate for and advance the interests of their constituents, regardless of shared identity.