1/37
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Why is it important for auditors to understand and evaluate internal controls?
For financial statement audits, auditors need to understand controls that are relevant to the audit to identify and assess the risks of material misstatements
Risk assessment Procedures - Goal for the auditor
Obtain an understanding of internal control
Evaluate the components of the system of internal control
risk assessment procedures
InspectionÂ
Inquiry of entity personnelÂ
ObservationÂ
Reperformance
The types of risk assessment procedures auditors perform, and the information they gather to understand and evaluate the system of control are
Update and evaluate the auditor’s previous experience with the entityÂ
Make inquiries of client personnelÂ
Examine documents and records
Observe the entity’s activities and operationsÂ
Perform walk-throughs of the information system
Understand IT general controls
Walk through
the tracing of selected transactions through the accounting system
Three ways documentation of the understanding of internal controls is done?
Narrative, Flow char and internal control questionare
Narrative
A written description of a client's internal controls, including the origin, processing, and disposition of documents and records and the relevant control activities
Flow chart
A diagrammatic representation of the client’s documents and records and the sequence in which they are processed
Internal control questionare
A series of questions about the controls in each audit area, used as a means of gaining an understanding of the internal control
Evaluate the design of the controls (whether the controls are capable of effectively preventing or detecting and correcting material misstatement)
Evaluate System of Internal Control steps
Determine if the controls have been implemented (i.e., the control exists and the company is using it)
Evaluate System of Internal Control steps
Evaluate the competence of the people carrying out the controls
Evaluate System of Internal Control steps
Evaluate the adequacy of information technology (e.g., does it capture relevant information such as an electronic signature for approval, and does it provide relevant information?)
Evaluate System of Internal Control steps
Auditors perform risk assessment procedures and document the system of internal control to?
evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the system
three levels of the absence of internal controls
Control Deficiency
Significant Deficiency
Material Weakness
control deficiency
exists if the design or operation of controls does not detect and correct misstatements in a timely manner.
significant deficiency
exists if one or more control deficiencies exist that are of sufficient importance to merit attention by those in governance.
Material weakness
exists if a significant deficiency results in a reasonable possibility that internal control will not prevent or detect material financial misstatements on a timely basis.
compensating (or mitigating) control
is a control elsewhere in the system that offsets a weakness. Note that any control can be a compensating control.
What happens when a compensative control exists
the weakness is no longer a concern because the potential for misstatement has been sufficiently reduced.
Things auditors need to understand the effectiveness of the client’s control system to adjust detection risk appropriately
Evaluate the control environment, risk assessment and monitoring processÂ
Evaluate the information systemÂ
Evaluate control activities
Consider whether the controls of outsourced systems should be included in control activitiesÂ
Other considerations in evaluating control activities
How do auditors to evaluate the effectiveness of controls in control activities at the assertion level
control risk matrix
Key controls
Controls that are expected to have the greatest impact on the risk of material misstatements in classes of transactions and relevant assertions
Assessment of control risk
A measure of the auditor’s expectation that inertial controls will neither prevent material misstatements at the assertion level from occurring nor detect and correct them if they have occurred
Audit Approach
Auditors have choices when developing an appropriate audit approach to address the identified risks of material misstatements at the assertion level
Two types of audit approach
Perform substantive procedures onlyÂ
or
Perform a combined approach using both tests of controls and substantive procedures.Â
Substantive approach
the audit approach used in which the auditor decides not to rely upon control and collect audit evidence primarily through substantive testsÂ
Combined (or controls-based) approach
the audit approach used in which the auditor decided to rely upon controls and collects audit evidence through a combination of control tests and substantive tests
Benefits of control tests
Performing tests of controls may be more cost efficient than performing substantive procedures in certain situations
In what circumstances do auditors needed to rely upon internal controls
Highly automated systems
Decision process: substantive versus combined approach
Decision process
Understanding of Internal ControlÂ
Evaluate Internal Control DesignÂ
Is design effectiveÂ
NO (CR high) -> substantive audit approachÂ
Is it cost-effective to test the controls Â
No, Substantive audit approachÂ
Yes, perform test of controlsÂ
Yes, Evaluate test of controlsÂ
Combined audit approach (controls + substantive)Â
No (substantive audit approach)Â
Tests of Controls
shows whether the controls actually worked throughout the period and were effective in preventing, detecting, correcting misstatements
Types of audit procedures used to assess the effectiveness of controls
Make inquiries of appropriate entity personnelÂ
Inspection documents, records, reportsÂ
Observe control-related activitiesÂ
Reperfrom client proceduresÂ
Test data approach
Auditor Reporting on Internal Control
Auditors are required to communicate significant deficiencies and material weakness to management and those in charge of governance.
Internal control letter
description of the internal control deficiency and recommendation, sent to the audit committee
Management letter
auditor's observation of less significant internal control-related matters, and opportunities for the client to make operational improvements
WIR
Weakness, implication and recommendation