1/3
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Marketing Accountability
• Rising importance: Marketing managers increasingly need to justify actions and demonstrate impact.
• Big Data Era: Impossible for managers to hide behind absence of data.
• Two main approaches to managing resource trade-offs: Anchoring and Adjusting (old) vs. Attribution Approach (new, links decisions to ROI).
Anchoring and Adjusting Approach (Old)
• Definition: Relying on marketing outcomes to attribute a budget without looking at the link or relationship between resources and outcomes; a heuristic.
• Examples of heuristics:
◦ Percentage of profit (or sales) method: Marketing budget varies with past profits/sales. Issue: Budget goes up when things are good, down when marketing is needed most. Does not optimize relationship between activities and outcomes.
◦ Competitive parity: Spending the same as competitors. Issue: Doesn't optimize resources; a cheaper, well-conceived campaign can be more impactful.
• Overall: Triggers organizational inertia, not recommended.
Attribution Approach (New & Recommended)
• Definition: Measuring the relationship between marketing resources and marketing outcomes (e.g., how salesforce/advertising changes market share/sales).
• Purpose: Allocate resources to optimize desired outcomes, avoid waste, implement proactive strategies.
• Two types of tools:
◦ Experiments (A/B testing):
▪ Question: Does a specific action change consumer behavior?.
▪ Method: Compare a control group (no action) with an experimental/treatment group (action applied), measure delta in a dependent variable (e.g., willingness to buy).
▪ Validity: High internal validity (little other factors explain delta if random samples). Results can be extrapolated if samples are representative. Large online companies do regular experiments (e.g., Facebook).
◦ Response Models:
▪ Question: What is the incremental quantitative impact of a 1% change of a key marketing input on a performance output?.
▪ Method: Use historical data to build statistical models linking marketing resources (e.g., pricing) to outcomes (e.g., sales).
▪ Automation: Can be built manually or using automated allocation models (e.g., ADBUDG), with machine learning increasingly automating them.
Marketing Metrics
• Definition: Key performance indicators used to check efficiency of marketing decisions or sales/marketing teams.
• Two main types:
◦ Specific Metrics:
▪ Intermediate Marketing Metrics: Close to the customer, capture effects of marketing decisions for short feedback loops. Examples: consumer satisfaction, service quality, brand awareness, customer retention, customer loyalty.
▪ Accounting Metrics: Sales, growth, costs, profits. Important but can have long delays between marketing intervention and actual impact.
◦ Aggregate Metrics (Financial): Track marketing performance over time, benchmark competitors.
▪ Net Marketing Contribution (NMC): Profit after sales and marketing costs. Key indicator of marketing resource allocation problems.
▪ Marketing ROS (Return on Sales): What portion of sales is profit.
▪ Marketing ROI (Return on Investment): What portion of sales and marketing costs is profit.
• NMC is most useful: Decomposing NMC with specific metrics shows that increasing it isn't just about cutting budgets, but also strategies to grow market share, grow demand, or negotiate better with distribution.
• Correlation: Strong relationship between operating income and NMC for companies with a marketing mindset (e.g., Apple).