1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Theophrastus 319 BC
Greek philosopher who pondered why everyone in Greece have characters so different despite being under the same sky and educated the same
personality
what is beneath the mask
authentic true self separate from social roles
linked to rise of western individualism
what is personality
individual differences that are not psychological, nonintellectual, enduring and broad
not physical attributes, not intellectually-related (e.g. stupid, clever), not transient attributes (e.g. angry, happy), not context-specific (e.g. smoker, jazz lover)
fundamentally important dispositions for individual differences
personal identity and self-concept
social communication and gossip
person perception
stereotypes
personality and self-concept
describing yourself
33% - likes, beliefs
25% personality traits
9% behaviours
9% interpersonal attributes
personality and social communication
argued that human intelligence evolved to handle complexities of group life - much of social communication aims to learn what others are like i.e. personality
person perception
judging other people’s personalities
rapid
dispositional inference - based on behavior and characteristics.
correspondence bias - overestimating personality traits in others' behaviors
personality psychology
dedicated to understanding the whole person. contrasts with social
person v situation
places emphasis on factors intrinsic to person
triple focus of personality psych
human nature - every person is like all others
systematic variation - every person is like some
personal uniqueness - not like anyone
describing personality
simplest descriptive unit is ‘trait’. can follow hierarchy
high-level trait e.g. extraversion
mid-level e.g. sociability and sensation-seeking
low-level e.g. physical or sexual sens-seeking
illustrative behaviour e.g. sky-diving or raunchy dating app profile
trait
consistent pattern of behaviour thinking or feeling
relatively stable over time
relatively consistent across situations
varying between people
dispositional
1 theory of trait organisation - food analogy
people come in four types
pomegranate - hard inside and outside
walnut - hard outside and soft inside
prune - soft outside hard inside
grape - soft both
lexical approach
method of developing taxonomy of personality through surveying traits encoded in language
assumes that important distinctions for describing people are incorporated in everyday speech
Allport and Odbert 1936
attempted to survey the trait universe by searching large dictionary for words that could describe differences between people. then filtered removing physical, cog abilities, transient states and highly evaluative terms
originally 18000//550,000 = 4,504.18,000 after filter
Raymond Cattell
4,504 too many with many being synonyms = reduced into 171 groups of synonyms or antonyms using factor analysis
used 16 factors that rep basic dimensions of personality
some of Cattell’s16 factors
reserved v outgoing
stable v neurotic
trusting v suspicious
humble v assertive
problem with Cattell
the 16 factors still correlated with different factors might both reflect a single under-lying super-factor. ideally the dimensions of personality should be independent of one another
e.g. outgoing v reserved and shy v venturesome
Fiske reduced from 16 into 5
the big five
Openness to experience
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Neuroticism