1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
falsification principle
FLEW
(inspired by POPPER)
religious language
noncognitive
meaningless
what is the falsification principle?
statement is meaningful if there is evidence to falsify it
what would disprove it?
e.g. ‘all swans are white’ - would need to find a swan that isn’t white
parable used in falsification principle
Parable of the Gardener
explorers set up different tests to prove the existence of God
tests = events in history, like Holocaust
god doesn’t intervene in any
but theist just adjusts his definition of God to explain his failure to appear / intervene
what do believers do according to falsification principle?
requalify beliefs “shift the goal posts”
leading to “death of God by a thousand qualifications”
e.g. Job in Bible continues belief, refuses falsification
example Flew uses
child dying of inoperable throat cancer
POE - why doesn’t God intervene?
BUT theist doesn’t accept this is evidence for false statement
instead requalifies statement - e.g. God gives freewill
so Flew asks: what would have to happen for a believer to say ‘God does not love us’ or ‘God does not exist’?
nothing!
so meaningless - might as well just believe anything
pros of falsification
used by scientists testing hypotheses
high standard for meaningfulness
restricts meaning to scientific evidence
empiricism in modern world
test of whether a person’s belief is rational
can be accepted by atheists
counters of falsification
can’t be falsified
too restrictive about what is ‘meaningful’
HARE’s Bliks = religious beliefs are meaningful to theists
religious belief is falsifiable
“if Christ has not been raised, your faith is pointless” - PAUL
some theists are prepared to falsify beliefs - shouldn’t generalise
most religious believers take a realist view of God, not anti-realist
sometimes people change their beliefs over time
Parable of the Partisan
fall to contradictory evidence = faith not strong enough
faith without reason