AP Government Court Cases

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 1 person
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/48

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

49 Terms

1
New cards

Engel v Vitale

First Amendment/Establishment Clause - Government-directed prayer in public schools violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, even if the prayer is denominationally neutral and students may remain silent or be excused from the classroom during its recitation.

<p>First Amendment/Establishment Clause - Government-directed prayer in public schools violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, even if the prayer is denominationally neutral and students may remain silent or be excused from the classroom during its recitation.</p>
2
New cards

Lemon v Kurtzman

Parochial schools must be private schools. They cannot be publicly funded via state law.

Lemon Test:
1. The statute must have a secular legislative purpose. (Also known as the Purpose Prong)

2. The principal or primary effect of the statute must not advance nor inhibit religion. (Also known as the Effect Prong)

3. The statute must not result in an "excessive government entanglement" with religion. (Also known as the Entanglement Prong)

<p>Parochial schools must be private schools. They cannot be publicly funded via state law. <br><br>Lemon Test: <br>1. The statute must have a secular legislative purpose. (Also known as the Purpose Prong)<br><br>2. The principal or primary effect of the statute must not advance nor inhibit religion. (Also known as the Effect Prong)<br><br>3. The statute must not result in an "excessive government entanglement" with religion. (Also known as the Entanglement Prong)</p>
3
New cards

Reynolds v U.S.

First Amendment/Free Exercise Clause - the statute can punish criminal activity without regard to religious belief. The First Amendment protected religious belief, but it did not protect religious practices that were judged to be criminal such as bigamy. Those who practice polygamy could no more be exempt from the law than those who may wish to practice human sacrifice as part of their religious belief.

<p>First Amendment/Free Exercise Clause - the statute can punish criminal activity without regard to religious belief. The First Amendment protected religious belief, but it did not protect religious practices that were judged to be criminal such as bigamy. Those who practice polygamy could no more be exempt from the law than those who may wish to practice human sacrifice as part of their religious belief.</p>
4
New cards

Baker v. Carr

1962 in Tennessee, federal government has the ability to intervene in a state's redistricting to ensure fairness because redistricting is not just a political question

<p>1962 in Tennessee, federal government has the ability to intervene in a state's redistricting to ensure fairness because redistricting is not just a political question</p>
5
New cards

NY Times v. U.S.

First Amendment/Freedom of the Press - New York Times and Washington Post could print the Pentagon Papers without risk of government censorship or punishment

<p>First Amendment/Freedom of the Press - New York Times and Washington Post could print the Pentagon Papers without risk of government censorship or punishment</p>
6
New cards

Schenck v. U.S.

First Amendment/Freedom of Speech/non-protected - The circulars urged "Do not submit to intimidation" but advised only peaceful action such as petitioning to repeal the Conscription Act. Schenck was charged with conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act by attempting to cause insubordination in the military and to obstruct recruitment. During wartime, utterances tolerable in peacetime can be punished. Clear and present danger test.

<p>First Amendment/Freedom of Speech/non-protected - The circulars urged "Do not submit to intimidation" but advised only peaceful action such as petitioning to repeal the Conscription Act. Schenck was charged with conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act by attempting to cause insubordination in the military and to obstruct recruitment. During wartime, utterances tolerable in peacetime can be punished. Clear and present danger test.</p>
7
New cards

Gitlow v. New York

First Amendment/Freedom of Speech/non-protected - the government may suppress or punish speech that directly advocates the unlawful overthrow of the government and it upheld the constitutionality of the state statute at issue, which made it a crime to advocate the duty, need, or appropriateness of overthrowing government by force or violence, selective incorporation of 14th amendment.

<p>First Amendment/Freedom of Speech/non-protected - the government may suppress or punish speech that directly advocates the unlawful overthrow of the government and it upheld the constitutionality of the state statute at issue, which made it a crime to advocate the duty, need, or appropriateness of overthrowing government by force or violence, selective incorporation of 14th amendment.</p>
8
New cards

Buckley v. Valeo

First Amendment/Freedom of Speech/protected - campaign finance - upheld federal limits on campaign spending and identified spending money to influence elections is a form of free speech

<p>First Amendment/Freedom of Speech/protected - campaign finance - upheld federal limits on campaign spending and identified spending money to influence elections is a form of free speech</p>
9
New cards

Tinker v. Des Moines

First Amendment/Freedom of Speech/symbolic speech - students' wearing of armbands in support of Vietnam truce did not interrupt school activities, pure speech

<p>First Amendment/Freedom of Speech/symbolic speech - students' wearing of armbands in support of Vietnam truce did not interrupt school activities, pure speech</p>
10
New cards

U.S. v. Lopez

Second Amendment - gun laws about schools not related to interstate commerce and not under federal authority

<p>Second Amendment - gun laws about schools not related to interstate commerce and not under federal authority</p>
11
New cards

Mapp v. Ohio

Fourth Amendment/Exclusionary Rule - evidence taken in unreasonable searches and seizures may not be used in court.

<p>Fourth Amendment/Exclusionary Rule - evidence taken in unreasonable searches and seizures may not be used in court.</p>
12
New cards

Miranda v. Arizona

Fifth and Sixth Amendment - unless the accused is notified of the reason for their arrest, the ability to consult with an attorney, the ability to not self-incriminate their testimony is not permissible in court.

<p>Fifth and Sixth Amendment - unless the accused is notified of the reason for their arrest, the ability to consult with an attorney, the ability to not self-incriminate their testimony is not permissible in court.</p>
13
New cards

Korematsu v. U.S.

Fifth and Sixth Amendment - internment of Japanese-Americans during WWII was Constitutional, justified during times of emergency and peril

<p>Fifth and Sixth Amendment - internment of Japanese-Americans during WWII was Constitutional, justified during times of emergency and peril</p>
14
New cards

Griswold v. Connecticut

Ninth Amendment - state ban on use of contraceptives violates the right of marital privacy

<p>Ninth Amendment - state ban on use of contraceptives violates the right of marital privacy</p>
15
New cards

Roe v. Wade

Ninth & Fourteenth Amendments/privacy
Abortion is a private matter

<p>Ninth &amp; Fourteenth Amendments/privacy<br>Abortion is a private matter</p>
16
New cards

Plessy v. Ferguson

Fourteenth Amendment/Separate is Equal - ruled that railway cars provided were essentially equal so no violation of equal protection.

<p>Fourteenth Amendment/Separate is Equal - ruled that railway cars provided were essentially equal so no violation of equal protection.</p>
17
New cards

Brown v. Board of Education

Fourteenth Amendment/Separate not Equal - Integration of Schools - racial segregation violates the equal protection clause

<p>Fourteenth Amendment/Separate not Equal - Integration of Schools - racial segregation violates the equal protection clause</p>
18
New cards

Regents of California v. Bakke

Fourteenth Amendment/Upheld Affirmative Action - race may be one of several factors in college admission policies.

<p>Fourteenth Amendment/Upheld Affirmative Action - race may be one of several factors in college admission policies.</p>
19
New cards

Marbury v. Madison

Establishes the Supreme Court as having the power of Judicial Review/interpret the Constitution

<p>Establishes the Supreme Court as having the power of Judicial Review/interpret the Constitution</p>
20
New cards

McCulloch v. Maryland

Implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause - Creation of the bank was implied based upon the enumerated power of Congress to tax. State of Maryland could not tax federal bank due to Supremacy Clause

<p>Implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause - Creation of the bank was implied based upon the enumerated power of Congress to tax. State of Maryland could not tax federal bank due to Supremacy Clause</p>
21
New cards

Gibbons v. Ogden

Supreme Court of the United States held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation

<p>Supreme Court of the United States held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation</p>
22
New cards

Shaw v. Reno

1993 case in NC with majority-minority districts, court ruled it was an example of racial gerrymandering and thus these districts were unconstitutional. The case was a problem of reverse discrimination. (Redistricting cannot be based on race!)

<p>1993 case in NC with majority-minority districts, court ruled it was an example of racial gerrymandering and thus these districts were unconstitutional. The case was a problem of reverse discrimination. (Redistricting cannot be based on race!)</p>
23
New cards

New York times v. Sullivan

1964 - public official may not win a libel suit unless they can prove the statement was made knowing to be false or with reckless disregard of its truth

<p>1964 - public official may not win a libel suit unless they can prove the statement was made knowing to be false or with reckless disregard of its truth</p>
24
New cards

Texas v. Johnson

A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.

<p>A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.</p>
25
New cards

Barron v. Baltimore

Ruled that the Bill of Rights cannot be applied to the states. (Before selective incorporation and the 14th amendment)

<p>Ruled that the Bill of Rights cannot be applied to the states. (Before selective incorporation and the 14th amendment)</p>
26
New cards

Gideon v. Wainwright

A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to afford their own attorneys.

<p>A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to afford their own attorneys.</p>
27
New cards

Obergefell v. Hodges

Upholds same sex marriage via 14th amendment equal protection clause

<p>Upholds same sex marriage via 14th amendment equal protection clause</p>
28
New cards

Wisconsin v. Yoder

Compelling Amish students to attend school past the 8th grade violates the free exercise clause of Amendment I

<p>Compelling Amish students to attend school past the 8th grade violates the free exercise clause of Amendment I</p>
29
New cards

McDonald v. Chicago

Held that the 14th Amendment allows for the 2nd Amendment to be applied to the states and citizens have the right to bear arms.

<p>Held that the 14th Amendment allows for the 2nd Amendment to be applied to the states and citizens have the right to bear arms.</p>
30
New cards

Citizens United v. FEC

Political spending by corporations and unions is a form of Constitutionally-protected free speech

<p>Political spending by corporations and unions is a form of Constitutionally-protected free speech</p>
31
New cards

Near v. MN

the press is protected from prior restraint in accordance with the press clause of the First Amendment

32
New cards

Palko v. Connecticut

The Fifth Amendment right to protection against double jeopardy is not a fundamental right incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment to the individual states.

33
New cards

Brown v. Board of Education 2nd

Ordered schools to desegregate "with all due and deliberate speed."

34
New cards

Abbington v. Schempp

Prohibited devotional Bible reading in public schools by virtue of establishment clause and due process clause. Warren Court's judicial activism

35
New cards

Wesberry v. Sanders

Ordered House districts to be as near equal in population as possible.

36
New cards

US v. Nixon

The Supreme Court does have the final voice in determining constitutional questions; no person, not even the President of the United States, is completely above law; and the president cannot use executive privilege as an excuse to withhold evidence that is 'demonstrably relevant in a criminal trial

37
New cards

Webster v. Reproductive Health Services

More leeway for states in regulating abortion, though no overturning of Roe v. Wade.

38
New cards

Employment Division of Oregon v. Smith

States could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual.

39
New cards

Planned Parenthood v. Casey

A 1992 case in which the Supreme Court loosened its standard for evaluating restrictions on abortion from one of "strict scrutiny" of any restraints on a "fundamental right" to one of "undue burden" that permits considerably more regulation.

40
New cards

Clinton v. NY

Banned presidential use of line item veto

41
New cards

Bush v. Gore

Use of 14th Amendment's equal protection clause to stop the Florida recount in the election of 2000.

42
New cards

Zelman v. Simmons-Harris

Public money can be used to send disadvantaged children to religious schools in tuition voucher programs.

43
New cards

Ashcroft v. ACLU (2002)

Struck down a federal ban on "virtual" child pornography

44
New cards

Lawrence v. Texas

Using right of privacy, struck down Texas law banning sodomy.

45
New cards

Gratz v. Bollinger

Struck down use of "bonus points" for race in undergrad admissions at University of Michigan.

46
New cards

Grutter v. Bollinger

Allowed the use of race as a general factor in law school admissions at University of Michigan

47
New cards

Kelo v. New London

Eminent domain case: Local governments may force the sale of private property and make way for private economic development when officials decide it would benefit the public.

48
New cards

Gonzales v. Carhart

Upheld Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.

49
New cards

DC v. Heller

Struck down a Washington DC ordinance that banned handguns