1/97
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Team
two or more people who perceive themselves as a group and interacts with each other
Dyad
2 people
Triad
3 people
Small Group
4
Corresponding Effects
an event that affects one member of a group will affect the other group members
Common Goal
aim or purpose shared by members of a group
Work Teams
manage themselves, assign jobs, plan and schedule work, make work
Parallel Teams
consists of representative from various departments within an organization
Project Teams
formed to produce one
Management Teams
managers; provide general direction and assistance to other teams
Forming
team members feel out the team concept and attempt to make a positive impression
Storming
group members start to disagree with one another (tension and conflict)
Norming
establishing of roles and policies (acknowledging reality of team)
Performing
accomplishing the goal
Process Losses
resources expended toward team development and maintenance rather than the task
Brook's Law
principle that adding more people to a late project only makes it later
Social Loafing
when people exert less effort than what they are capable of
Assignment
employees are assigned to them
Physical Proximity
tendency to form groups with people who either live or work nearby
Affiliation
involves our need to be with other people
Identification
need to associate ourselves with the image projected by other people, groups, or objects
Emotional Support
to obtain emotional support
Assistance for Help
to obtain assistance or help
Common Interest
to obtain emotional support
Common Goals
pursuit of a common goal
Group Cohesiveness
extent to which group members like and trust one another, are committed to accomplishing a team goal, and share a feeling of group pride
Group Homogeneity
extent to which its members are similar
Homogenous Group
members are similar in some or most ways
Heterogenous Group
members are more different than alike
Slightly Heterogeneous Groups
a few group members have different characteristics from the rest of the group
Stability of Membership
extent to which the membership of a group remains consistent over time
Isolation
degree of physical distance of a group from other groups
Outside Pressure
amount of psychological pressure placed on a group by people who are not members of the group
Psychological Reactance
when we believe that someone is trying to intentionally influence us to take some particular action, we often react by doing the opposite
Straw Man
an opponent who does not actually exist but to whom negative statements about the group can be attributed
Group Size
number of members in a group
Additive Tasks
those for which the group's performance is equal to the sum of the performances by each group member; each contribution is important
Conjunctive Tasks
group performance depends on the least effective group member
Disjunctive Tasks
group performance is based on the most talented group member
Social Impact Theory
If the group is already stable and cohesive, adding another member might be disruptive
Group Status
esteem in which the group is held by people not in the group
Communication Structure
manner in which members of a group communicate with one another
Group Roles
extent to which its members assume different roles
Task
Oriented Roles
Social
Oriented Roles
Individual Role
blocking group activities, calling attention to oneself, and avoiding group interaction
Social Facilitation
involves positive effect of presence of others on individual's behavior
Social Inhibition
involves the negative effects of other's presence
Audience Effects
takes place when a group of people passively watch an individual
Coaction
the effect on behavior when two or more people are performing the same task in the presence of one another
Mere Presence
the very fact that others happen to be present naturally produces arousal and thus may affect performance
Comparison
effect when an individual working on a task compares his or her performance with that of another person performing the same task
Evaluation Apprehension
idea that a person performing a task becomes aroused because he or she is concerned that others are evaluating his or her performance
Distracting
idea that social inhibition occurs because the presence of others provides a distraction that interferes with concentration
Social Loafing
individuals in a group often exert less individual effort than they would if they were not in a group
Free
Rider Theory
Sucker Effect
social loafing occurs when a group member notices that other group members are not working hard and does are "playing him for a sucker"
Individual Dominance
when one member of a group dominates the group
Groupthink
state of mind in which a group is so concerned about its own cohesiveness that it ignores important information
Devil's Advocate
group member who intentionally provides an opposing opinion to that expressed by the leader or the majority of the group
Nominal Group
when several people individually work on a problem but do not interact
Interacting Group
when individuals interact to solve a problem
Group Polarization
group members will shift their beliefs to a more extreme version of what they already believe individually
Brainstorming
group members are encouraged to speak out their ideas
Work Team
a collection of three or more individuals who interact intensively to provide an organizational product, plan, decision, or service
Identification
extent to which group members identify with the team rather than in other groups.
Interdependence
one member does greatly influences what another member does
Power Differentiation
overstepping roles, challenge opinions, interrupt each other, gives orders and use sarcasm
Social Distance
an imaginary space that separates two colleagues such as treating them formally and very politely rather than being casual
Permanency
extent to which a team will remain together or be disbanded after a task has been accomplished.
Proximity
physical distance between people.
Virtual Teams
teams that communicate through email rather than face to face.
Crew
group of expert specialist that have specific role positions, perform brief events that are closely synch with each other, and repeat
Parallel Teams
Consist of representatives from various departments (functions) within an organization
Project Teams
Formed to produce one
Management Teams
Coordinate, manage, advise, and direct employees and teams
Forming
team members get to know each other and decide roles
Storming
begins to disagree with each other; frustration starts individually
Norming
easing the tension from the previous stage
Performing
begins to accomplish the goals
Punctuated Equilibrium
suggests that rather than forming in stages, teams develop direction and strategy in the first meeting, follow this direction for a period of time, and then drastically revise their strategy about halfway through
Conflict
psychological and behavioral reaction to a perception that another person is keeping you from reaching a goal
Dysfunctional Conflict
keeps people from working together, lessens productivity, spreads to other areas, and increases turnover
Functional Conflict
moderate levels of conflict can stimulate new ideas, increase friendly competition, and increase team effectiveness
Interpersonal Conflicts
occurs between two individuals
Individual
Group Conflicts
Group
Group Conflict
Avoiding Style
ignore conflict and hope it will resolve itself
Triangling
occurs when an employee discusses the conflict with a third party
Accommodating Style
a person is so intent on settling a conflict that he gives in and risks hurting himself
Forcing Style
handles conflict in a win
Collaborating Style
wants to win but also wants the other person win as well
Compromising Style
adopts give
Least Acceptable Result (Lar)
lowest settlement that a person is willing to accept in a negotiated agreement
Maximum Supportable Position (MSP)
highest possible settlement that a person could reasonably ask for and still maintain credibility in negotiating an agreement
Dispute
when they can't agree to resolve the conflict
Cooperative Problem Solving
all department reps come over to solve the problem