Meta-ethical approach - Naturalism

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/5

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

6 Terms

1
New cards

Introduction to naturalism/what does it teach?

  • Naturalism teaches that there is nothing outside of our senses that can be studied to help us understand ethical language.

  • Therefore, there is no God to guide humanity on the meaning of ethical language terms like ‘good, bad’ etc.

  • Naturalism finds the meaning of ethical words in concrete empirical evidence, we should be able to find sensory evidence for the meaning of ethical language in the world around us.

2
New cards

What is the meta-ethical approach to Naturalism?

  • Ethical naturalists believe that ethical language terms, like ‘good’ and ‘bad’, are ethical facts.

  • e.g. when I state ‘stealing is bad’, what I mean is that ‘stealing is bad’ because I can prove it with empirical evidence.

  • Therefore, according to an ethical naturalist an ethical statement is expressing factual knowledge, in the same way as a scientific fact does.

  1. Scientific fact - ‘Water is made up of two-parts hydrogen and one part oxygen’

  2. Ethical fact - ‘Hitler was a bad person’

  • According to naturalism both of the above statements are facts - known as cognitive statements - because both can be supported with empirical evidence.

3
New cards

How does naturalism argue we can know whether something is good or bad - and what does this mean for moral laws?

What are objective moral laws not derived from?

  • Objective moral laws exist independently of human beings

  • Naturalism argues we can know whether something is good or bad, right or wrong, by direct reference to the physical world around us (realism/empirical evidence) - hence objective moral laws/facts exist.

  • Objective moral laws are not derived from any form of a priori knowledge, intuition, or metaphysical source - but derived from the natural world.

4
New cards

What is the world considered, and what does this mean it can be used for?

  • Objective moral laws exist independently of human beings

  • The world is objective and real (realism) and so can be used to establish knowledge and truth.

  • The world is not part of our imagination and any moral laws we make are also real because they relate directly to objective facts of existence.

5
New cards

Where is all of our knowledge derived from, and how are we born?

  • Objective moral laws exist independently of human beings

  • All knowledge (ethical and non-ethical) is derived from our senses (see, hear, feel, etc).

  • We are born with ‘a clean slate’ (absence of preconceptions of ethics) and everything we learn has its origins in the world of sense around us.

  • e.g. putting your finger in a socket - you find out it electrocutes you.

6
New cards