1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
self-incrimination clause
you can’t be forced to testify against yourself in a criminal case
miranda warning
you have the right to remain silent, anything you say or do will be used against you in the court of law. you have the right to an attorney, if you cannot afford one, the court will provide one to you
four components of the self-incrimination clause
can’t be forced- unless you choose to testify in court, then you must answer
any criminal case- even civil cases with punishments count
to be a witness- protects spoken or written testimony, not physical stuff (like fingerprints. blood)
against yourself- only you can refuse; others can testify against you
custody
miranda only applies if you’re in custody (like arrested). not all police talks count as custody
custody examples:
traffic stop- no
prolonged stop (too long)- yes, it’s basically an arrest
at home or police station- yes
voluntarily going to station- no
juvenile in school office- yes
probation check-in- no
questioned for minor crime on street- yes
interrogation
miranda only applies if police are questioning you. just being in custody isn’t enough
two types of interrogatoin
direct questions- straight up asking
indirect pressure- tricks or comments meant to make you confess (like saying, “where’s the gun? kids might get hurt)
miranda vs. arizona (1966)
supreme court case that created the rule: the police must read miranda rights before questioning people in custody
waiving miranda rights
you can give up your rights, but only if you do it knowingly and voluntarily. you don’t have to say it out loud- your actions can show it
police trickery and waiver
even if police use tricks, your statement can count if you still knew your rights and gave them up willingly
fruit of the poisonous tree (exception in 5th amendment)
even if police don’t read miranda, things they find from a voluntary confession (like a weapon or drugs) can still be used in court
documenting a confession
police must keep records like:
interview notes
video recording
signed statement by suspect
review with suspect to confirm it’s accurate
due process voluntariness rule
a confession can’t be used in court if it was forced or made under pressure
involuntary confessionn
if poice pressure make you lose the ability to resists (like threats or violence), your confession won’t count
why the rules exist
the constitution values people’s rights, so the government has limits on how it can get confessions