11) e- beam

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/27

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

28 Terms

1
New cards

Photons

  • no charge - indirectly ionizing (have to give up energy to something else)

  • no mass


“aka: ball of energy - kamehameha”

<ul><li><p>no charge - indirectly ionizing (have to give up energy to something else)</p></li><li><p>no mass</p></li></ul><p><br>“aka: ball of energy - kamehameha”</p>
2
New cards

Electrons

  • charged mass - directly ionizing

  • mass

3
New cards

Why do we use e- beams?

superficial tx

-all e- likely to interact at the surface

<p>superficial tx<br><br>-all e- likely to interact at the surface</p>
4
New cards
<p>TLDR: </p><p>1) e- has high surface dose</p><p>2) rapid fall off</p><p>3) BSG tail (discussed later)</p>

TLDR:

1) e- has high surface dose

2) rapid fall off

3) BSG tail (discussed later)

in contrast, photons/xray have lower fall off, b/c it penetrates more deeper in tissue

<p>in contrast, photons/xray have lower fall off, b/c it penetrates more deeper in tissue</p>
5
New cards

How do we produce an e- beam? How is it different from an xray beam?

1) remove x-ray target (so e- beam is like one line)

2) replace flattening filter w/ scattering filter
→ spreads that e- beam out
→ gives it a field size

3) e- applicator
- e- tend to scatter in air compared to photons
- applicator guides the beam (prevents scatter)

*4) ion chamber (checks for even distribution; but xray beam has this too)

<p>1) remove x-ray target (so e- beam is like one line)</p><p>2) replace flattening filter w/ scattering filter<br>→ spreads that e- beam out<br>→ gives it a field size</p><p>3) e- applicator<br>- e- tend to scatter in air compared to photons<br>- applicator guides the beam (prevents scatter)</p><p></p><p>*4) ion chamber (checks for even distribution; but xray beam has this too)</p>
6
New cards

When doing our beam check with the ionization chamber (QA daily checks), what should we check for if we see that the beam doesn’t match what we inputted in e- mode?

check the scattering foil!

7
New cards

Discuss e- interactions

1) incoming e- (energetic) undergoes COULOMB INTERACTIONS w/ “absorbed” atoms

2) Could be interacting w/
- atomic orbital e-
- atomic nuclei (BSG xray)

8
New cards

What is meant by couloumb interactions?

electric field of e- interacts w/ other electric fields

9
New cards

As e- propagate through absorbing medium, they interact w/ ATOMS via:
- inelastic coulomb interactions or
- elastic coulomb interactions.

1) What is elastic collision?

2) What is inelastic collision?

3) What are we interested in for this course?

1) no change in energy of incoming e- (incident e-) → but changes direction

2) incident e- giving up (imparting) energy to another particle

3) inelastic

<p>1) no change in energy of incoming e- (incident e-) → but changes direction</p><p></p><p>2) incident e- giving up (imparting) energy to another particle</p><p></p><p>3) inelastic</p>
10
New cards

What does inelastic interactions depend on?

1) b = impact parameter
- distance of incoming e- from nucleus

2) a = radius
- radius of e- in that atom from the nucleus

<p>1) b = impact parameter<br>- distance of incoming e- from nucleus</p><p></p><p>2) a = radius<br>- radius of e- in that atom from the nucleus</p>
11
New cards

Discuss when b>>a for e- interactions

soft collision
→ small KE transfer
→ grimace costume BARELY touches

<p>soft collision<br>→ small KE transfer<br>→ grimace costume BARELY touches</p>
12
New cards

Discuss when b>a for e- interactions

hard collision
→ LARGE KE transfer
→ lots of KE from incoming e- transferred to orbital e-
→ causes ionization/excitations

<p>hard collision<br>→ LARGE KE transfer<br>→ lots of KE from incoming e- transferred to orbital e-<br>→ causes ionization/excitations</p>
13
New cards

Discuss when b< < a

radiative collision
→ e- attracted to positive charge of nucleus
→ form BSG xray photon

<p>radiative collision<br>→ e- attracted to positive charge of nucleus<br>→ form BSG xray photon</p>
14
New cards

Inelastic collisions b/w incident e- and an orbital e- are coulomb interactions that result in __

1) atomic ionization
- ejection of orbital e- from absorber atom

2) atomic excitation
- orbital e- moved to higher level orbit

Both = collisional stopping power

15
New cards

What is collisional stopping power?

amt of energy it loses over given path via IONIZATION or EXCITIATION

16
New cards

Coulomb interactions b/w incident e- and absorber NUCLEUS results in __.

1) e- scattering & no energy loss (elastic collision)

2) e- scattering WITH KE LOSS in form of BSG = radiative stopping powerW

17
New cards

What is radiative stopping power?

ability of material to SLOW DOWN charged particle

18
New cards

What is LINEAR STOPPING POWER?

energy incident e- loses through inelastic collisions
(KE loss from e- per unit length [cm]) (MeV/cm)

TLDR: rate of energy loss

<p>energy incident e- loses through inelastic collisions<br>(KE loss from e- per unit length [cm]) (MeV/cm)<br><br><span style="color: yellow"><strong>TLDR: rate of energy loss</strong></span></p>
19
New cards

What is TOTAL MASS STOPPING POWER?

Linear stopping power divided by DENSITY
- allows us to compare materials easier

20
New cards

Total mass stopping power has 2 components. What are they?

1) collisional stopping power from ionization/excitation

2) radiative stopping power from BSG production

<p>1) collisional stopping power from ionization/excitation</p><p>2) radiative stopping power from BSG production</p>
21
New cards
<p>Summarize this graph:</p>

Summarize this graph:

1) Collisional stopping power = ionization or excitation from incoming e-
- water is more e- dense, therefore we see more collisional SP compared to lead

2) Radiative stopping power = BSG production via interaction/bending of e- due to nucleus
- Pb has higher atomic number, therefore more radiative SP compared to water

3) higher energy = more penetrating
- more interactions w/ nucleus, not the e- area
- as energy increases, we see radiative SP dominate (not collisional)

No4)

5) 6Mv-10Mv (is radiation therapy range)
- we see more Kcoll than Krad
→ good thing b/w WE WANT the e- to e- interactions.
→ we WANT those ionizations and excitations!

<p>1) Collisional stopping power = ionization or excitation from incoming e-<br>- water is more e- dense, therefore we see more collisional SP compared to lead</p><p> </p><p>2) Radiative stopping power = BSG production via interaction/bending of e- due to nucleus<br>- Pb has higher atomic number, therefore more radiative SP compared to water</p><p> </p><p>3) higher energy = more penetrating<br>- more interactions w/ nucleus, not the e- area<br>- as energy increases, we see radiative SP dominate (not collisional)</p><p> </p><p>No4)</p><p>5) 6Mv-10Mv (is radiation therapy range)<br>- we see more Kcoll than Krad<br><span style="color: yellow"><strong>→ good thing b/w WE WANT the e- to e- interactions.</strong></span><br>→ we WANT those ionizations and excitations!</p>
22
New cards

When is collisional stopping power dominant?

KE below 10MeV

*note: situation is reversed at higher energies
(b/c BSG x ray higher w/ high energy, therefore more radiative)

23
New cards

What is it called when 2 stopping powers are equal?

critical kinetic energy

24
New cards

The rate of energy loss for therapeutic e- beam in water is what?

2MeV/cm
-therefore 12 MeV beam can only travel 6cm
—
ans to q = 3cm

<p>2MeV/cm<br>-therefore 12 MeV beam can only travel 6cm<br>—<br>ans to q = 3cm</p>
25
New cards

What does the rate of energy loss for collision interactions depend on (Collisional SP)

1) KE of incoming e-

2) e- density of absorbed (atom’s e- density)

Ex. H20 has higher e- density (more likely for incoming e- to hit an orbital e-)
- Pb has less e- dense b/c massive nucleus, therefore probability of e-to e- is unlikely

26
New cards

What does the rate of energy loss for RADIATIVE interactions depend on (Radiative SP)

1) KE of incoming e-
2) Atomic #/ size of the absorber (makes sense)

27
New cards

Summary:
Total energy loss by e- traversing an absorber depends on…

1) KE energy of e-
- affects both radiative and collision

2) Size/atomic # of absorber
- affects radiative

3) e- density
- affects collision

28
New cards
term image