1/23
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
civil liberties
rights spelled out in a Bill of Rights or the Constitution that guarantee the protection of a person, expression, and property from arbitrary interference of government officials.
civil rights
positive acts of the government designed to protect persons against arbitrary or discriminatory treatment by government of individuals.
landmark Supreme Court cases
establish precedent and change the interpretation of the law / establish new case law on a particular issue
Bill of Rights
designed to protect individual liberties and rights; not originally designed to be applied to the states
14th amendment
birthright citizenship
equal protection clause: mandates state governments to treat all people within their jurisdiction with "the equal protection of the laws"
due process clause: no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law
citizenship
by blood or by land
jus sanguinis (Latin: right of blood)
jus soli (Latin: right of soil)
due process
substantive: the constitution protects the public from unwarranted government intrusion which infringes on fundamental rights (enumerated rights)
procedural: requires government to enforce its policies in a way that ensures fair treatment under the rules
property rights
contract clause: designed to prevent states from extending the period during which debtors could meet their payments or otherwise get out of contractual obligations
police power: the states protect the public health, safety and wellbeing of the residents
eminent domain: the power to take property for public use (5th Amendment)
incorporation of the Bill of Rights
incorporation doctrine: the general concept of applying the Bill of Rights to state governments
selective incorporation: the process by which the U.S. Supreme Court has applied specific rights from the Bill of Rights to the states through the 14th Amendment's Due Process Clause (all except 3rd, 7th, & 10th)
First Amendment rights
freedoms of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition
Establishment Clause
prohibits the government from establishing or supporting a religion (government-sponsored religion, financial support of a religion, involvement in religious matters)
Lemon Test
three-prong inquiry on government conduct
government must have a secular purpose
must have a principal or primary effect that does not advance or inhibit religion
cannot foster excessive government entanglement
endorsement test: the establishment clause forbids government practices that a reasonable observer would view as endorsing religion even if there is no coercion
non-preferential tests: the Constitution prohibits favoritism toward any particular religion but does not prohibit aid to all religions
strict separation: indirect aid should be prohibited
Free Exercise clause
No government has authority to compel us to accept any creed or to deny any right because of beliefs or lack of them
exclusionary rule
prevents illegally obtained evidence from being used in court.
applies to evidence collected in violation of a defendant's constitutional rights, such as those guaranteed by the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, and serves as a deterrent to unlawful police conduct.
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
Background: African American students were denied admission to white public schools based on segregation laws allowing “separate but equal” facilities (from Plessy v. Ferguson).
Decision: The Court unanimously ruled that racial segregation in public schools violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment — declaring that “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”
Engel v. Vitale (1962)
Background: A New York school authorized a short, voluntary prayer at the start of each school day. Parents sued, claiming it violated the Constitution.
Decision: The Court held that government-directed prayer in public schools violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, even if the prayer is nondenominational and voluntary.
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Background: Gideon, charged with a felony, couldn’t afford an attorney and was denied one by the state court. He defended himself and was convicted.
Decision: The Court ruled that the 6th Amendment right to counsel applies to state courts through the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause. States must provide attorneys to defendants who can’t afford them.
McDonald v. Chicago (2010)
Background: Chicago’s handgun ban was challenged after District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), which recognized an individual’s right to bear arms under the Second Amendment.
Decision: The Court held that the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms applies to the states through the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
New York Times Co. v. US (1971)
Background: The Nixon administration tried to stop the New York Times and Washington Post from publishing the classified “Pentagon Papers.”
Decision: The Court ruled that prior restraint (censorship before publication) violated the First Amendment’s freedom of the press — the government failed to prove publication would cause a direct, immediate harm.
Roe v. Wade (1973)
Background: “Jane Roe” challenged a Texas law banning most abortions, arguing it violated her right to privacy.
Decision: The Court held that the right to privacy, implied by the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, protects a woman’s right to choose an abortion, though the state may regulate it in later stages of pregnancy.
Schenck v. US (1919)
Background: During WWI, Schenck distributed leaflets urging resistance to the draft. He was charged under the Espionage Act.
Decision: The Court upheld his conviction, establishing the “clear and present danger” test — speech can be limited if it poses a clear and imminent danger to national security or public order.
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969)
Background: Students were suspended for wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War.
Decision: The Court ruled that students do not lose their First Amendment rights at school unless their speech causes a substantial disruption. The suspensions violated freedom of speech.
Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)
Background: Amish parents refused to send their children to school past 8th grade due to religious beliefs, violating Wisconsin’s compulsory education law.
Decision: The Court held that forcing Amish children to attend school beyond 8th grade violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment — religious freedom outweighed the state’s interest in compulsory education.
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Background: Miranda confessed to the crimes after two hours of police interrogation. His confession was used against him at trial, leading to his conviction.
Decision: The Fifth Amendment requires that law enforcement officials advise suspects of their right to remain silent and to obtain an attorney during interrogations while in police custody.