1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
during both the constitution convention and the state ratifying conventions,
one of the principal obections of “anti-fed” who opposed the constitution was that it lacked a bill of rights to protect the most important rights of citizens
BofR history
went back to the magna Carta and the English declaration or bill of rights in 1689
early state constitution written during the Revolution
typically included such declarations of rights
George Mason
wrote Virgina’s—ratified 5 days before the DOI—and Mason himself was one of the leading anti-fed who refused to sign the constitution b/c it lacked the BofR
In order to aviod a second constitutional convention
James Madison accepted the need for a BofR even though he initially objected (feds) that a BofR was unnecessary b/c it implied powers given to the fed gov that the constitution clearly didn’t give it—like a power to regulate speech
Madison obliged
leading the creation of the BofR—the first 10 amendments to the US constitution—was ratified by 1791
in fed 84
AH wrote: “BofR are in their origin, stipulations between kings and their subjects, abrindgments of prerogative in favor of privilege, reservations of rights not surrendered to the prince. such was the magna carta, obtained by the Barons, swords in hand, from King John”d
debate in Mass over the Constitution was so contentious that
Federalist Francis Dana and anti-fed Elbridge Gerry got into a fistfight. to resolve the quandary, the heroes of the revolution and leading anti-fed Samuel Adam an John Handcock agreed to ratification on the condition that the convention also propose amendments. =Mass compromise
NY didn’t follow the Mass Compromise
NY convention was majority anti-fed and its leader, Melancton Smith, wrote the “NY circular letter” calling for a second convention. (by this point enough states had ratified that the constitution would go into effect reguardless) Smith hoped to use the Article V process to amend the constitution and thus wanted “conditional ratification”
John Jay and Alexlander Hamiliton altered the letter
to support uncondtitional ratification in exchange for an amendment process but only NY an V made the call for a second convention, as Madison wrote in the BofR partially in response to this action from the states
The HofR approved 17 proposed amendments, which were sent to the senate, who altered and consolidated them
congress passed 12 amendments, which were then sent to the states for ratification. only 10 were ratified=BofR but not called that b/c they believed them to be insufficient and felt that Madison ignored their calls for structural amendents which would limit the powers of then national gov