Exam 2- Legal Environment of Business

studied byStudied by 5 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 154

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

This a knowt for LEB (BADM 350) at Black Hills State University. Over chapters 6,7,8. Made 2023

Business

155 Terms

1

What is a tort?

A civil wrong.

New cards
2

What makes a tort?

someone has a personal injury or property damage.

New cards
3

What is the remedy for torts?

Damages

New cards
4

There are two types of laws…

Criminal Law and Civil

New cards
5

Civil law torts includes…

property, insurance, family, wills and trusts, contracts

New cards
6

Civil torts includes (part 2) …

product liability employment law and TORT law.

New cards
7

What do you say instead of “guilty” in civil court?

Liable

New cards
8

What do you say instead of “not guilty” in civil court?

not liable

New cards
9

Is drunk driving a civil or criminal tort?

It is both. It overlaps.

New cards
10

How could you sue someone for drunk driving in civil law?

Negligence driving and damages.

New cards
11

How could you sue someone for drunk driving in criminal tort?

DUI and Impose penalty.

New cards
12

Compensatory Damages

compensated for actual lose.

New cards
13

Special Damages

quantifiable monetary losses

New cards
14

Example of special damages

hospital bills, loss of wages, ambulance ride, car damage

New cards
15

General damages are…

difficult to quanitfy

New cards
16

Example of Compensatory Damages

pain and suffering, mental distress, loss of enjoyment of life

New cards
17

Example of Compensatory Damages (part 2)

Disfigurement, loss of companionship and loss of consortium

New cards
18

Pain and Suffer is

the pain and suffering caused by the injury itself.

New cards
19

Mental distress is…

shock or fright or emotional distress.

New cards
20

Loss of enjoyment of life is…

injured person does not have the ability to participate in normal activities or everyday life.

New cards
21

Loss of Consortium is…

the loss of benefit from a family relationship

New cards
22

Loss of companionship is…

the same as loss of consortium.

New cards
23

Fines are…

Punitive Damages

New cards
24

Punitive Damages are…

awarded at trail as a way of punishing a wrongdoer.

New cards
25

Battery is…

an unauthorized harmful or physical contact with someone.

New cards
26

If you raise your fist at someone this would be considered…

assault.

New cards
27

If you punch someone this is considered…

battery.

New cards
28

How can you have battery charges with no assult charges?

The person attacked didn’t see the act of violence coming.

New cards
29

Battery can be…

direct or indirect.

New cards
30

Battery must be…

intentional.

New cards
31

If a person is consenting to a behavior that can get them hurt then…

there will be no damages.

New cards
32

Vicarious Liability is when…

if an employee commits a tort- the employer is liable for that.

New cards
33

False Imprisonment is…

detaining someone in an unreasonable way.

New cards
34

What does a business need to “imprison” someone?

reasonable grounds for suspicion.

New cards
35

What is another requirement for business to “imprison” someone?

It must be conducted in a reasonable manner for a reasonable time.

New cards
36

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress is…

intentional behavior that exceeds the boundaries of decency.

New cards
37

Intentional Inflection of Emotional Distress must be…

extreme emotional distress not just rude or offensive behavior.

New cards
38

Defamation also is…

slander that has malice

New cards
39

Defamation is…

harming someone’s reputation with false statements.

New cards
40

Frivolous Litigation is…

a lawsuit that has no sense in it orr not base for it

New cards
41

What is frivolous litigation?

It is someone abusing the legal system.

New cards
42

Negligence is…

a person liable for the harm that is the foreseeable consequences of his/her actions.

New cards
43

What are the four elements of neglience?

Duty of Care, Breach, Injury, and Causation.

New cards
44

What are the last two elements of negligence?

Injury and Causation.

New cards
45

Duty of Care is when the court must ask if…

the defendant owes a duty of care to the plaintiff.

New cards
46

Type of Duty of Care…

General Duty, Statutorily imposed dutt and duty imposed on professionals.

New cards
47

What is it called when a professional does not provide their duty of care?

Malpractice.

New cards
48

Breach is…

failure to act a reasonable person would have in similar circumstances.

New cards
49

What is the Reasonable Person Standard?

Objective, Careful and Conscientious.

New cards
50

What must a court do when deciding a defendant had a Breach in negligence?

Measure the defendant’s conduct against the reasonable person standard.

New cards
51

If a company policy for a business defers from the norm and someone is harmed as a result of that, this is called a…

Unreasonable policy— defined as a breach.

New cards
52

A person who commits a tort is called…

Tortfeasor

New cards
53

What are compensatory damages? W

Awarded to an injured party that compensate for damages, injury or incurred loss.

New cards
54

What is an intentional tort?

An intentional tort is a civil wrong resulting from an intentional act on the part of the tortfeasor.

New cards
55

What is a negligence tort?

is when harm is caused to a person by another failing to act as a reasonable person.

New cards
56

What is a strict liability?

the defendant may be held accountable even in the absence of demonstrable negligence or fault.

New cards
57

What is strict liability also known as?

Absolute liability

New cards
58

A plaintiff can sue for…

injuries or damage to property.

New cards
59

The plaintiff in a tort case is….

the injured person.

New cards
60

Walmart V McCann Case is a case where….

mom and kids were detained in Walmart. They sued for false imprisonment.

New cards
61

Intentional infliction of emotional distress is also called…

tort of outrage

New cards
62

What is the definition of libel?

Is written or broadcasted defamation.

New cards
63

What is slander?

Oral defamation.

New cards
64

In defamation cases, public figures have to prove…

actual malice.

New cards
65

What are the two requirements for assumption of the risk?

The part had knowledge and voluntarily took the risk.

New cards
66

What is the court case where a snow boarder crashed on a man made jump?

Shukoski V. Indianhead Mountain Resort

New cards
67

Why did Shukoski (in Shukosi V. Indianhead Mountain Resort Case) sue the resort?

because they believed the resort was negligent in creating a bad design for this man-made jump. aka “unnecessary terrain modifications”

New cards
68

What was Indianhead Moutain Resorts defence? (in Shukoski V. Indianhead Mountain Resort Case)

Assumption of the risk

New cards
69

Why did Indianhead Mountain Resort win the case V. Shukoski?

The slope Shukoski went on was labeled an expert slope and he had been on it several times before the incident that occurred— he accepted the dangers and risks.

New cards
70

What is contributory negligence?

prohibits victims from recovering compensation in a personal injury claim if they were even 1% responsible for their own injuries.

New cards
71

What is contributory negligence known for being?

a complete defense.

New cards
72

What is comparative negligence?

assigns blame and damages in accidents based the percentage at fault from each party.

New cards
73

Does South Dakota use contributory negligence or comparative negligence?

Comparative negligence.

New cards
74

For negligence, what is one question the court must ask about the case?

Was it foreseeable?

New cards
75

Res Ipsa Loquitur in latin means…

the facts speak for themselves

New cards
76

Case example of “Res Ipsa Loquitur”

A medical instrument accidentally left in a person’s body.

New cards
77

What is Res Ipsa Loquitur (definition)

Negligence is extremely obvious that the defendant has to try to prove they were not negligent.

New cards
78

What is the first category of causation?

  1. Causation in fact

New cards
79

What is the second category in causation?

proximate cause.

New cards
80

What must happen to prove a causation of injury?

Must satisfy both categories.

New cards
81

Causation in Fact is when…

The defendant’s act was actual cause of the plaintiffs injury.

New cards
82

What is the BUT FOR Test?

but for the existence of X, would Y have occurred?

New cards
83

What is another phrase explaining the BUT FOR Test?

But for the negligent act the injury would not have occurred.

New cards
84

What is the proximate cause?

Was the risk of injury to the plaintiff foreseeable?

New cards
85

Proximate cause makes it so the defendant doesn’t…

necessarily always liable for all the damages “set in motion” by the negligent act.

New cards
86

Statute of Limitations is…

gives the plaintiff a certain amount of time in which to file a lawsuit (states varies)

New cards
87

When can a person not be able to sue a at fault party?

If the plaintiff misses the window for the statute of limitations.

New cards
88

Strict Liablity is…

certain activities are so abnormally dangerous that whoever is doing the activity must be prepared to compensate anyone who suffers injury as a result of the activity.

New cards
89

How could a product be liable for negligence?

Failure to warn and/or privity of contract.

New cards
90

Strict Liability for Products Liability could be…

1.Defect in manufacturing process 2. Defect in the design 3. Failure to warn.

New cards
91

A case example (for product liability) for defects in the manufacturing process

The Squirt Case (dead rat in soda can)

New cards
92

A case example (for product liability) for defect in the design

The Lawn Mower Case (the stopping mechanism for blades wasn’t designed well)

New cards
93

A case example (for product liability) for failure to warn.

The Hair Spray Case (not enough warnings about flammability)

New cards
94

What is product liability?

set of legal rules that gives victims a legal cause of action when they are injured by defective or dangerous products.

New cards
95

Who bears the law of strict product liability?

The sellers.

New cards
96

The first (1) requirement for strict product liability:

The product must be in a defective condition when the sellers sell it.

New cards
97

2nd (2) requirement for strict product liability:

The defendant must normally be engaged in the business of selling (or otherwise distributing) that product.

New cards
98

3rd (3) requirement for strict product liability:

The product must be unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer because of its defective condition (in most states)

New cards
99

4th (4) requirement for strict product liability:

The plaintiff must incut physical harm to self or property by use or consumption of the product.

New cards
100

5th (5) requirement for strict product liability:

The defective condition must be the proximate cause of the injury or damage.

New cards
robot