4.1 development of theory of mind

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/22

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

23 Terms

1
New cards

What is theory of mind?

Theory of mind (ToM) is the human ability to understand others as an agents processing subjective mental states like beliefs, desires, and intentions. It forms the basis for uniquely human social interaction essential for communication, cooperation and culture.

2
New cards

Define meta-representation and explain its significance to ToM

Meta-representations is the capacity to represent how others view the world from their own perspectives, enabling individuals to understand that others have beliefs, desires, and intentions that may differ from their own. It is crucial to ToM as it allows for understanding the mental states of others.

3
New cards

Describe the concept of belief-desire psychology

Belief desire psychology is the ability to understand how others believe the world is, what they desire and how they might act based on those beliefs and desire to achieve their own goals

4
New cards

Lost and briefly explain the four characteristic signatures of mature subjective meta-representation

The four signatures are: (i) Difference: recognizing others' perspectives can differ from one's own; (ii) Incompatibility:understanding those perspectives can be incompatible with one's own; (iii) Mis-representation: acknowledging others can hold false beliefs; and (iv) Aspectuality: understanding individuals represent objects and situations under specific aspects.

5
New cards

How does ToM contribute to the development of a “second-person” perspective?

Tom allows for a “second-person” perspective by enabling individuals to understand another person as a separate subject with their own perspectives. This fosters intersubjective engagement, where individuals can share views, communicate, and relate empathetically.

6
New cards

Explain how ToM impacts communicative competence in children

Tom positively impacts communicative competence by enabling children to consider the perspectives of their conversation partners. This leads to more effective communication, including improved argumentation, persuasion, and tailoring of messages to the listeners viewpoint.

7
New cards

Outline the potential negative consequences of ToM in real-life scenarios

Negative real life consequences of ToM include its potential use for manipulation and deception. Individuals with advanced ToM can exploit their understanding of others mental states to lie, deceive, and manipulate others for selfish gain

8
New cards

What are the key cognitive milestones in the development of ToM in infancy?

Key cognitive milestones in ToM development during infancy include the “9 month revolution”, marked by the emergence of perception-goal psychology. Infants begin to understand ithers’ perceptions, goals, and how they act to achieve those goals based on their perceptions.

9
New cards

Explain the concept of level 1 perspective taking and how it differs from level 2

Level 1 perspective taking: refers to understanding that others can see things differently from oneself due to varying viewpoints, like objects being occluded.

Level 2 perspective taking: achieved later, involves understanding that the same things

G can be perceived differently by individuals, like seeing a ‘6’ as a ‘9’ from a different angle.

10
New cards

What role do executive function and language play in the development of ToM?

Executive function, particularly inhibitory control and working memory, is crucial for the development of ToM as it supports the ability to manage conflicting perspectives and engage in recursive reasoning. Language provides the representational structure and vocabulary (especially mental state verbs and complementation syntax) for understanding and expressing mental states.

11
New cards

False belief task

A classic test of ToM where children must understand that someone can hold a belief that is false.

12
New cards


Implicit ToM:

The idea that ToM abilities might operate unconsciously and be evident in nonverbal behavior, even in infancy.

13
New cards

Dual-process theory of ToM:

The theory that there are two distinct ToM systems: an early-developing, implicit system and a later-developing, explicit system.

14
New cards

Shared intentionality:

The capacity to engage in collaborative activities with others, sharing goals and intentions.

15
New cards

Mind-mindedness:

A parenting style characterized by sensitivity to and understanding of the child's mental states.

16
New cards

Aspectuality:

The understanding that individuals represent objects and situations under specific aspects or identities.

17
New cards

What are the real-life benefits of having a well-developed ToM?

Stronger social skills: Children with better ToM are often better at navigating social situations, joining groups, and resolving conflicts.

Enhanced communication: They are more adept at conversation, persuasion, and tailoring their arguments to the listener's perspective.

Improved peer relationships: Children with good ToM are generally seen as more likeable and have more positive peer relationships.

Increased prosocial behavior: They are more likely to show empathy, comfort others, and engage in helping behaviors.

Better academic performance: Preschool ToM skills can predict better academic achievement in primary school, potentially due to the benefits of social competence fostered by ToM

18
New cards

Can ToM have negative consequences?


Deception and manipulation: Understanding others' beliefs can be used to lie or manipulate them effectively.

Bullying: Some bullies might leverage their ToM to understand their victims' vulnerabilities and exploit them.

19
New cards

What are the future directions for ToM research?

Proximal mechanisms: While we know that factors like language and executive function are crucial for ToM, more research is needed to pinpoint the exact mechanisms by which they contribute to meta-representation.

Neural development: We need to better understand how changes in brain structure and function, especially in the frontal and temporoparietal regions, relate to cognitive transitions in ToM development.

Implicit ToM: The validity and nature of implicit ToM remain highly contested. Concerted research efforts are needed to systematically test the reliability and validity of implicit ToM tasks and clarify their implications for developmental theories.

20
New cards

Developmental milestone of ToM: 9 month revolution

9-month revolution: Infants start to exhibit perception–goal psychology, where they understand that others have different perceptual perspectives and goals, and act accordingly.

○They understand that others can see different things.

○They understand that others have different goals.

○They expect others to act rationally to achieve their goals based on their perceptions.

21
New cards

4-year revolution:

Children develop belief–desire psychology, demonstrating a more sophisticated understanding of others' mental states. They can now grasp four key signatures of meta-representation:

Difference: Others' perspectives can differ from our own.

Incompatibility: Others' perspectives can be incompatible with our own.

Mis-representation: Others can hold false beliefs that influence their actions.

:Aspectuality Others represent objects and situations under specific aspects, influencing their understanding and actions.

22
New cards

Factor influencing ToM development: social determinants

Socioeconomic status, number of siblings, parental mind-mindedness (being attuned to the child's mental states), and cultural factors influence ToM development by providing varying levels of social and linguistic learning opportunities.

23
New cards

How is implicit ToM measured in infancy

This is measured using tasks that minimise linguistic and cognitive demands, such as:

Violation-of-expectation looking-time tasks: Measuring infants' looking times to assess their surprise when agents act inconsistently with their presumed beliefs.

Anticipatory looking tasks: Using eye-tracking to assess whether participants anticipate an agent's actions based on their presumed beliefs.

Interaction tasks: Observing whether participants consider an agent's beliefs during communicative or cooperative interactions.

Altercentric interference tasks: Measuring reaction times and errors to assess if participants implicitly consider another agent's perspective, even when irrelevant to the task.