1/33
Week 1 1/7/26 Abnormal/pathological cognitions (thoughts), behaviors and/or emotions
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Determining if a behavior is abnormal can be difficult, but
Context is important.
Some contemporary criteria for psychological disorders
Deviance, Dysfunction, Distress, Danger (to self or others)
Deviance
Statistical infrequency (rarity) or deviation from the norm.
Limitations:
Rare (gifted/ eccentric)
Changing norms and different cultural norms (e.g., drapetomania or homosexuality)
Dysfunction
functional impairment (work, relationships, self-care, etc.)
Limitations:
Who defines dysfunction?
Some behaviors are dysfunctional without being considered abnormal (e.g., leading a sedentary lifestyle)
(Personal) Distress
Psychological suffering and a desire for symptoms to stop.
Limitation:
Some abnormal behavior is not distressing.
E.g., some delusions or antisocial behavior
Danger
Danger to oneself or others.
Limitations:
Most people with psychological disorders do NOT present a danger to themselves or others.
Some people are a danger to themselves or others but DO NOT have a mental disorder.
DSM
Disorders are organized based upon similar disorders
DSM uses various ways to define abnormal behavior
DISTRESS or DYSFUNCTION,
clinically significant,
Deviance alone doesn’t count
Three main categories of assessment:
-Clinical interview (structured, unstructured or semi-structured)
-Tests (e.g., intelligence, personality, mood inventories
- Observation
Assessment
the process of collecting relevant information to determine:
How and why the person is behaving abnormally.
How the person might be helped.
Theraputic Orientation
the way in which the clinician is trained
Reliability
the consistency of assessment measures
Validity
– A measure of the accuracy of a test’s results
test-retest reliability
the same individual getting the same results each time
interrater reliability
An individual recieves the same score, from all 4 psychologists using the same tools
face validity
does the test measure what it appears to measure?
predictive validity
A tool’s ability to predict future characteristics or behaviors
concurrent validity
The degree to which measures gathered form one tool agree with the measures gathered from other assessment techniques
Diagnosis
Based on syndromes, which are symptoms that often cluster together.
Treatment
Varies based upon the diagnosis and clinician’s therapeutic orientations.
Validity
needs Reliability
Reliability
does not need validity
History of Abnormality: Three basic perspectives
Supernatural
Biological (somatogenic)
Psychological (psychogenic)
In Ancient times, there was a force of deamons from the body through methods like
trephination and exorcism
Trephination
holes drilled into the skull for deamon to exit the skull.
Hippocrates: all pathology result of an imbalance of the
Humors
Middle Ages
Demonology
Renaissance:
Asylums (overcrowded)
Mind could be sick like the body
Demonological views declined
Bedlam in 1600’s
1800’s
Emhpasis on humane, respectful treatment
Phillipine Pinel (France)
Dorothea Dix (USA)
Still no Treatments
Became overcrowded
Early 1900’s:
contrasting perspectives emerge Psychogenic vs. Somatogenic
Hypnosis:
Anton Mesmer (Mesmerized)
Josef Breuer
Psychoanalysis
Freud: Talk Therapy
Somatogenic Perspectives
Emil Kraeplin- father of modern diagnostic approach
Syphilis→ General Paresis (Richard von Krafft-Ebbing)
Lobotomy
Walter Freeman
Not effective
increased eugenics
Deinstitutionalization
New Medications:
Antipsychotic drugs
Antidepressant drugs
Antianxiety drugs
Pust towards deinstitutionalization, rise in outpatient care