1/64
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Process of Natural Selection
overproduction of offspring
variation within the community
struggle for survival due to lack of recourses
differential survival to different environments
reproduction to pass on adaptations
Main sources of genetic variation
- mutation in DNA gene sequence
- meiosis
- sexual reproduction
Variation effect on a population
increases chances of survival because there is a higher chance of some of the members resisting large amount of change
Gene
a heritable factor that influences a specific characteristic
Allele
different forms of a gene (differ by a few DNA bases)
Mutation
change to base sequence of DNA
Mutations in DNA sequence
new alleles produced my mutations could = change in phenotype, impacting chances of survival
What does a diploid cell produce
four haploid, non-identical cells
Meiosis
production of haploid cells to make gametes so an organism can sexually reproduce
Aspects of meiosis that promote genetic variation
- the crossing-over exchange of genetic material between homologous chromosomes
- the random + independent orientation of homologous chromosomes
Effect of crossing over/random orientation
every single gamete from a parent is genetically unique
- likely to have never existed
Variation in an asexually-reproducing population
all members are genetically identical
Variation in a sexually-reproducing population
wide range because of fusion of gametes from different parents
Examples of species producing more offspring than could survive
Natural selection - overproduction
individuals with the most suitable phenotypes survive
Overproduction - carrying capacity
struggle for survival because of competition for recourses
Individuals that will survive to reproductive age
those better suited to the environment (+ will reproduce)
Main driving force of evolution
change in environment (abiotic factors that are density-independent)
Abiotic factors as selection pressures (Magellanic penguins)
- live on coast of south america, well adapted for cold conditions
- chicks have thick down feathers to retain heat (can shake of snow but aren't waterproof)
- ↑ rainfall due to climate change = ↑ chick death due to hypothermia
Abiotic factors as selection pressures (Snow crabs)
- thrive in cold waters (Atlantic + northern Pacific oceans)
↓ water temperatures = ↑ oxygen absorption = ↑recourses = ↑ crab population
Species fitness
how well-adapted a species is to its environment
Differential survival
organism with high fitness = higher chance of survival over organisms with low fitness
Useful variation examples
hiding from predators, keeping warm/cool, obtaining water, finding food
Harmful variation examples
inappropriate colour for camouflage, large body size (more nutrition req.)
Heritable trait
trait encoded by genes
Phenotype
visible trait
Genotype
combination of alleles
Acquired characteristics example
flamingoes born white, eat prawns, become pink
Sexual selection
reproductive success of an individual
Things that can affect sexual selection
physical + behavioral traits that impact the attraction of mates
Sexual dimorphism
Differences in physical characteristics between males and females of the same species.
Why females in bird species that show sexual dimorphism prefer exaggerated traits
- male has enough energy to grow/maintain it + repeatedly carry out courtship displays = sufficient nutrition
- male can survive in its environment with adaptations = well-adapted in other ways
Which is stronger - selective pressure of predation or selective pressure of attraction?
selective pressure of predation
Selective power of predation example
guppies moved to different stream
- ↑ predator = ↓ spots
- ↓ predator = ↑ spots
Allele frequency
proportion of a particular allele in a population/gene pool
Change in allele frequency =
evidence that evolution is occuring
How allele frequency is determined
average it out
(no. times allele appears/ total number of copies of the gene)
What frequency of alleles must add up to
1.0
Separation + different environments + random changes =
two unique groups (speciation)
When will further mutations occur during speciation
at random - when new alleles are introduced into each of the gene pools
Allele databases
AlFred allele frequency data base
Allele Frequency Net Database
When does natural selection act on individuals
different phenotypes
How are phenotypes mostly determined
genotype
Reproduction impact on gene pool
individuals that reproduce contribute their alleles to the gene pool of the NEXT generation
Natural selection effect on gene pools
some individuals are more likely to survive + reproduce (therefore contribute their alleles) than others
favourable phenotypes
selection pressures in an environment can change to favour one phenotype over another
General patterns of natural selection
- directional selection
- disruptive selection
- stabilising selection
(all types = change in allele frequencies over time)
Directional selection
when natural selection favours one phenotype over another (can occur along a spectrum for a trait ex: length/colour)
When does directional selection occur
change in environment
- overtime frequency ↑ favourable phenotype ↓ unfavourable phenotype
Directional selection example (Indian Peacock)
large tail = favourable bc flight (will still be upper/lower limit based on what's practical)
Directional selection example (Peppered moths)
- naturally occurring as dark or light + mottled
- industrial developments killed pale coloured lichens on near bye trees
- recent efforts to improve pollution brought back lichens, favouring the light phenotype again
Disruptive selection
when two extreme phenotypes are favoured over one intermediate one
Disruptive selection evolution
can be an advantage for accessing recources
- overtime the two extremes become more frequent
Disruptive selection example (red crossbill)
- asymmetric low beaks to extract seeds from conifer cones
- two extremes (left-over-right and right-over-left) vs. one intermediate (normal/symetric)
Disruptive selection example (coho salmon)
- some males mature as much as 50% younger and as small as 30% of the adult body size other males in the population
- small/large gain access to females by sneaking in and fighting, intermediate-sized have a competitive disadvantage
Stabilising selection
intermediate phenotype is favoured over extreme ones
Stabilising selection evolution
different disadvantages of each extreme
- over time intermediate phenotype becomes more frequent
Stabilising selection example (birth weight in humans)
average birth weight favoured
- low = ↓ chance in survival bc pf underdeveloped organ systems
- high = ↓ chance of survival bc of potential complications during pregnancy
Stabilising selection example (clutch size in birds)
medium clutch size (no. eggs) favoured
- low = no offspring survive?
- high = too many offspring to provide adequate care/nutrition to all
Hardy-Weinberg equation for genes with two alleles
p^2 + 2pq + q^2 = 1
and
p + q = 1
p^2 + 2pq + q^2 = 1
P^2 - homozygous dominant
2pq- heterozygous
Q^2 - homozygous recessive
Problem-solving using Hardy-Weinberg equations
1. find q^2 (recessive trait)
2. use q^2 to find p (p+q = 1)
3. p^2 + 2pq + q^2 = 1 to find all genotype frequencies separately
Assumptions of Hardy-Weinberg
- no mutation
- random mating
- no gene flow
- very large population size
- no natural selection
If assumptions not met - Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
equilibrium not met, species may evolve (allele frequencies may change from one generation to the next)
Natural selection vs. artificial selection
bacteria that is resistant to antibiotics = natural selection, even though antibiotics would be considered artificial selection in this case