1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Conceptions of delinquency
Normative conception
Social constructionist conception
Critical conception
assures there is a general set of norms of behavior, conduct or conditions which society agrees on (delinquency violates these)
Violations of norms on a societal reaction scale (serious violation = formal response)
Normative conception
behaviors are not inherently delinquent, but become so once society labels them as such (delinquency constructed by society)
More focused on the label attached to individuals rather than their behavior itself
Limitation
Doesn’t consider acts that are unknown (if it is unknown it cannot be labeled as delinquent)
Social constructionist conception
critiques the social system
Argues that the normative approach of delinquency is established by people in power to keep said power
Limitation
System actually serves to protect society’s interests
Critical conception
Why do we study juveniles?
not as much responsibility as adults
Ability to be “saved” - rehabilitation
Innocent + protection
Power - cared for by adults and no political power
What areas of children do management track
family and social environment
Economic circumstances
Health
Physical environment and safety
Behavior
Education
72.8 million children (12-17) 2020
Decrease of 1.3 million since 2010
1/3 fall into 12-17 age range (age crime curve)
Well-being of youth (age)
49.6% white non-Hispanic
25.6% Hispanic
13.7% black
5.4% Asian
Well-being of your (race/ethnicity)
decrease in the % of youth living in poverty
22% in 2010 compared to 14.4% in 2019
Depends on race/ethnicity
26.8% black non-Hispanic
20.9% Hispanic
30% Indian
10% white non-Hispanic
Black and Mexican Indian youth have a poverty rate 2.5-3 times higher than white youth
Youth well-being (economic circumstances)
51% of children live in an area where at least one air pollutant is above legal guidelines
8% of youth live in an area where their drinking water doesn’t meet standard
38% youth report inadequate housing
Youth well-being (physical environment/safety)
increase in education over time
GED graduation 84% (1980) to 94% (2019)
All races saw increases but no don’t share the same rates
Youth well-being (education)
Youth always misbehaved but wasn’t always considered delinquent
Age considered
Time period made behaviors okay
Treated/punished youth as adults
Youth were property of their fathers
Deserved physical pain as punishment
Often beaten harshly
Youth treatment in Ancient Greece
little distinction between people on age
Agricultural economy - needed lots of bodies to work
Age 7 was considered physiologically and emotionally stable to work
No other option than to work
Communication = adulthood
Abuse and neglect common = shorter lifespan
Society lived and functioned closed together
Deterred misbehavior
Youth treatment in Middle Ages
Youth were adults early and worked in fields
Gender differences
Males - develop skills through apprenticeship
Women - domestic servants or wives
Before the age of 7 - mens rea couldn’t be formed
From ages 7-14 decisions were made on a case-be-case basis whether they deserved to be treated as an adult
Juries hesitant to jail white males
Black youth
Over-criminalized
Adultified
Dehumanized
Youth treatment (colonial period)
assigned by state and local courts for youth ruled to be in need of care
Poor = delinquent
Saving them - teaching youth the value of hard work and responsibility (religious tone)
Viewed parents of these youth as lazy and incompetent
Led to parens patrie (state needs to step in as substitute parents)
House of refuge
moral and religious training and labor
Boys - on farms, merchants
Girls - maids
Weakened bonds is with the youths families
Parents weren’t notified of where their kid was going
Little to no control over what happened to their children
Abusive conditions, lack of food and water, prison setting
Conditions of house of refuge
middle and upper-class white men and women wanted to combine expert knowledge os science with the new ideologies about youth to improve society
Protect youth and give time for development
Two major changes
Age based education
Child labor laws
Criticized the house of refuge, reform schools, and industrial schools
Campaigned for the separation between adults and juveniles justice systems
Progressive movement
First juvenile court
1899 first court (Cook county, Illinois)
Rehabilitative ficus
Protection from adults
Youth could be influenced to change behaviors
Social and physiological factors play a role in delinquency
focused on white males
Court could interfere with family life
Created category of status offense
Increased number of youth involved in the system
Cons to early juvenile delinquency
baby boomers were reaching adolescence (1960s)
Experimented with drugs
Challenged status quo
Protested social and legal institutions (legal fairness and equality)
Baby boomers - modern view of delinquency
urbanization led to
Racial and ethnic diversity in major cities
Brought attention to discrimination in justice system
Led to youth receiving more legal rights
Even though rights were gained, they were still treated in the system similar to adults
Due process revolution
1990s
media portrayal of youth as dangerous and that we should fear them rather than protect them
Black and Latino young men often characterized as law breakers
Super predator myth
Smaller group on individuals your research question pertains to
Sample
Entire group of individuals that you research pertains to
Population
must represent the sample
Gender and race.ethnicity
Representative sample
FBI collects data from local law enforcement
Not 100% reported
Focused on clearance rates - proportion of crime considered closed because individuals have been arrested, died, or victim will not participate in prosecution
Limitations
Crimes have to be reported - doesn’t consider those who aren’t reported
8 index crimes
Does not capture Latinos
Universal Crime Report (UCR)
add on to the UCR
Distinguished between committed and attempted crimes
Index of 46 crimes as opposed to 8
Crimes against people, property, and society
Limitations
Still relies on crimes being reported
Still relies on law enforcement
National incident-based reporting system (NIBRS)
collects data on household and individual victimization
Conducted every 6 months
Focused on person and property crimes, ignores homicide, victimless crimes, or arson
Collects data on
Victim and offender - demographics
Relationship between the two
Characteristic of the crime - when, where, weapon, nature of crime
National crime-victimizatoin survey (NCVS)
surveys people about their offending - very reliable
Strengths
Focuses on the actual behavior of youth
Doesn’t have to rely on crimes being reported Still flies
Collects data on a lot of different topics
Family, school, peers, CJ system
Limitations
Self-report delinquency scales many not be equally valid across race, age, gender
Under/over resting
Self-report surveys
increase sharply from 1988-1993
Decreased in 2004; increased 2004-2006
Decrease since. 2006
Trends of violent crimes
Arrest rates do not show an increase from 1980-2008
Stable from 1980-1994; decline from 1994-2005
Decrease from 2008-2019
Property arrest trends
rates steady from 1980-1991
Increase from 1991-1997
Rate more than double from 300 per 100,000 to 700
Drug arrest rate trends
one of the strongest
Age crime curve
Likelihood to commit property crime peaks at 16
Violent crime peaks at 18
Age as a correlate to delinquency
boys engage in crime more than girls
4 times as likely to engage in violent crime
2 times as likely to engage in property crime
Girls more likely to engage in status offenses
Gender as a correlate to delinquency
minority groups offend more
Self-report surveys do not back this and suggest that there is no relationship
Higher police presence in areas with minorities
Race/ethnicity as a correlate to delinquency
macro level - crime/delinquency rates higher in neighborhoods of poverty or disorganization
Micro level - no strong relation between crime and class
Agnew - economic strain was a bigger factor
Class as a correlate of crime