1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Was liberal:
Emancipation
Zemstva
Judicial: less corrupt/more liberal and increased free speech
Education
Censorship
Nationalities
Wasn’t liberal
Emancipation
Tsar initially rejected ideas for a more democratic system - thought it would drive the diverse empire apart
National power - still the tsars
Military and ecclesiastical courts were excluded from reforms.
Tsar WAS only making concessions to win support + keep autocracy
Political
Control and repression
National Minorities
Peasants
Tsar WASN’T only making concessions to win support + keep autocracy
Emancipation
Zemstva
Judicial: less corrupt/more liberal and increased free speech
Education
Censorship: 1865 - reduced for publications
Nationalities
The Zemstva WAS liberal
Elected body → peasants could vote
Improved education, public health, local economies, roads
Appointed doctors + teachers
The original Zemstva were seen as so effective that from 1870 the model was copied + applied to towns and cities (duma)
The Zemstva WASN’T liberal
Electoral system favoured nobles
Had to own a certain amount of land before could run → nobles = represented, peasants = overlooked
The creation of the Zemstva appeared to divert the attention of the reformist nobility away from wanting changes w/ central gov
Gov limited the work of doctors/teachers + stopped them from evolving to become better
They were slow to be introduced/established in many provinces
Gov WAS almost ‘too liberal’ w/ reforms → led to AII’s opposition + assassination
Liberal members of the Zemstva started to question the 'administrative monopoly of officialdom' → critical of a regime that they perceived to be unresponsive to their demands.
Zemstva resulted in the emergence of the Populist movement.
When ‘Going to the People’ failed in 1874, group split → ‘the People's Will' turned to 'revolutionary terror' to gain support from peasants → eventually assassinated the tsar (1 March 1881)
Replaced the 3rd Section w/ Okhrana (1880) → less repressive + effective → assasination
Gov WASN’T ‘too liberal’ w/ reforms → led to AII’s opposition + assassination
Threat of opposition ebbed + flowed in face of repression used by the Tsar
Eg: 1877 - ‘Trail of the 50’ → LT imprisonment of key Populists
Judicial reforms:
1864
Trial by jury for criminal cases → BUT not guarunteed -bureaucracy still did intervene so trial by jury not always guaranteed
Evidence and witnesses could be challenged - less corrupt so really good for peasants
Defence was given a lawyer, even if it was at the expense of the state
Independent, salaried judges - less corrupt
Judges couldn't be dismissed, even if their decisions displeased authorities
Remained archaic vs west
Gov officials couldn’t be tried
Liberal/non-liberal Emancipation terms
Liberal:
Granted freedom to:
Marry w/o owner’s permission
Leave the land → got passports
Trade
Allotment of land
Emergence of Kulaks who did well out of the allocations + produced surplus etc (BUT only ~1% became serfs)
Non-liberal:
State serfs not liberated until 1866
RPs → 49yrs (longer than lifetime of serf) → not fully-free until these were payed
Temporary Obligation → 2yrs while land distribution was worked out BUT 15% still ‘temporarily obligated’ in 1881
Landowners chose what land they kept → peasants left w/ the bad quality land
Now under control of Mir, rather than nobles (still controlled)
Liberal/non-liberal Military reforms
Liberal:
Service reduced from 25 to 15 years
modernised training and provided rigorous instruction for officers
If recruits didn't have primary education, they were required to do 6 years, including literacy classes - all must be able to read
Better provisioning and medical care were established - improved quality of life
Military colonies abandoned - more freedom
Military colleges set up to provide better training to non-noble officer corps - ability to move ranks for all - fairer
Non-liberal:
Education + literacy were dropped for ordinary soldiers
Nobles still dominated leadership positions
Liberal/non-liberal Education reforms
Liberal:
Unis given more freedom over intake/curriculum etc
Removal of social discrimination of who could attend school
Women could attend university courses
b/w 1865-99 number of uni students increased by fourfold + was more socially diverse
Non-liberal:
Women couldn’t get degrees, despite attending courses
Universities didn’t have enough resources so many set up study groups, mutual aid funds, and shared libraries etc which was actually forbidden although was done discreetly
Liberal/Non-liberal nationalities changes
Liberal:
1863: Finish diets established
Poland’s EE (1862) = better terms (eg: 700,000 peasant families given freehold tenure of their own lands w/o RPs)
Non-liberal:
1863 - proposal to conscript Polish men to R army → uprising → Russification → Systematically dismantled Poland's autonomy
1864 seized property of the Roman Catholic church
1869 - shut Warsaw university and Russian replaced Polish as the official language
1867 - Banned Ukrainian language in publications + performances
AII WAS only making concessions to win support/remain an autocrat
1865: Rejects calls from the Zemstva for a constitution - reactionary
Women couldn’t get degrees, despite attending courses
Universities didn’t have enough resources so many set up study groups, mutual aid funds, and shared libraries etc which was actually forbidden although was done discreetly
Nobles still dominated leadership positions in military
EE: nobles no longer in political positions, instead police appointed by the central gov + under the Mir’s control
Used 3rd section to exile opponents until replaced w/ Okhrama (1880)
AII WASN’T only making concessions to win support/remain an autocrat
Replaced the 3rd Section w/ Okhrana (1880) → less repressive
1865: reduced censorship for publications
1864: Zemstva = forum for criticising the Tsar
1881: signed the Loris Melikov constitution which would have increased democracy before killed