1/253
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Democracy
Democracy is a government system where people hold power by voting in free and fair elections. It ensures basic freedoms, equal participation, rule of law, and accountability, allowing different voices and competition among leaders and parties.
What does a democracy require?
Participation, competition, and liberty
What are challenges to democracy?
Communism, fundamentalism, populism (to an extent, but it places itself within the communist regime)
Most Common to Least Common Democratic Governances:
Parliamentary
Presidential
Semi-presidential
Presidential System:
A relatively rare type of legislative-executive system, whereby the singular head of state and government is directly elected by the public for a fixed term and has control over the cabinet and legislative process, thus he/she is not beholden to the legislature
Parliamentary System:
the most common legislative-executive system, made up of a prime minister (that comes out of the legislature) as head of government, a legislature that can remove the prime minister from office, and a president or monarch as a head of state
Vote of No Confidence:
In a parliamentary system, it is the method by which the legislature may remove the prime minister from office
Semi-Presidential System
The least common legislative-executive system that combines the presidential and parliamentary systems, whereby the prime minister is charged with domestic policy and the directly elected president is charged with setting broader agenda and foreign policy (essentially, president sets policy, pm executes it)
Cohabitation
Arrangement in which presidents lacking a majority in the legislature appoint an opposition prime minister who can gain majority of support in the legislature
In a semi-presidential system, it can cause systemic gridlock/instability
Actors that influence democratization:
Elite Actors: The person that is in power matters
Society: Civil Society; democratic engagement and practice
International Relations: impact of foreign investment, trade, and globalization (modernization), outside influences can push democratization, civil society strengthened organizations outside the country
Culture: Democratic traditions and individualistic society (not modernization) are what breed democracy
Executives:
Carry out the laws and policies
Consists of Head of Government and Head of State
Heads of Government:
Main role: Leads daily operations and policy implementation
In some countries takes the form of ¨ Prime Minister¨
Elected: By legislature
Usually head of the largest party in legislature
Can be removed by a vote of no confidence (AKA: Centure)
Power can be weaker or stronger, depending on head of state
General rule in Democracy: usually whoever elects, removes them
Head of State:
Role: Symbolizes nation at home and abroad
May be a president or a monarch
Can be directly elected, elected by legislature, or hereditary (monarchy)
Can be weak or strong depending on the existence and relative power of the head of government
Unicameral Legislature
Legislature with a single chamber
Bicameral Legislature:
Legislature with 2 chambers
You can be bicameral and NOT be federal but you will NEVER see a federal system without a bicameral
Can be symmetric or asymmetric in power. Asymmetric = One house has most power (Ex: UK´s House of Commons) Symmetric= Both houses have the same amount of power (Ex: USA)
Constitutional Courts:
Highest judicial body in a political system that decides whether laws and policies violate the constitution
Have different forms of judicial review: Concrete Review and Abstract Review
Some countries only have either Abstract or Concrete while some may have both
Judicial Review:
Court´s power to asses law constitutionality
Concrete Review:
Judicial review AFTER law is enacted
Open to allowing more laws to happen knowing that it can do some harm
Abstract Review:
Judicial review BEFORE law is enacted
Ability to rule on constitutional issues without the need of a court case
France has abstract review
Electoral Systems:
Single Member Districts
Proportional Representation
Mixed System
Single Member Districts (First Past the Post)
Votes cast for INDIVIDUALS
Outcome: Candidate with the largest share wins seat or majority
Effect: Fewer and larger parties
AKA first past the post
Proportional Representation:
Votes cast for PARTIES
Seats divided among parties on basis of share of vote
More smaller parties
AKA multi-member district voting
Mixed System (Mixed Electoral System):
PR and SMD
Votes cast BOTH for parties and for individuals
Some seats filled by individual races, some by party outcome
Mixed outcome
Multimember District
One electoral district with more than one seat
Single Member District
Only one electoral seat per district
Open List Proportional Representation
Citizens vote for an INDIVIDUAL on the party list instead of for the whole party
Weakens power of political parties
Causes fragmented party system
Multiparty Presidentialism
Combination of presidentialism and fragmented legislature
prone to corruption and sent-seeking
SMD with 2 round runoff with 12.5% threshold (France):
4 bloc, 2 party system (France)
Major parties on the right form a bloc against major parties on the left
Republicanism
Indirect democracy that emphasizes separation of powers within a state and the representation of the public through elected officials
Referendum
National vote on specific legislative issues
Public is asked to accept or reject a specific proposal or policy but its proposed by government (TOP-DOWN)
Initiative
Citizen-driven proposal for legislation (Bottom-Up)
Civil Rights
Promotion of Equality
Rights promoting equality among citizens
Civil Liberties
Promotion of freedom
Rights ensuring individual freedoms
Social Democracies:
Political systems that blend democratic governance with a strong commitment to social welfare and economic equality
Ex: Healthcare, education, work, etc.
Positive Freedom:
Rights to pursue ones own goals
Negative Freedom:
Freedom from interference by others
Different types of non-democratic systems:
A small group of individuals exercise power
no constitutional responsibility to public
Dictates to the people (dictators)
No popular right to choose leaders
Limit, to varying degrees, other public rights
Ideology may or may not play a role (personalistic, military, religious)
What effect does the modernization theory have on democracy?
It theorized that as a society became more educated and economically developed, democracy would appear, but this has been largely discredited as modernization in some places has not lead to democracy, and has sometimes even lead to political violence and democratic failure
Forms of Non- Democratic Rule:
Totalitarianism
Authoritarianism
(military rule, absolute monarchy, theocracy, oligarchy, dictatorship, hybrid regimes)
Totalitarianism:
System with total control over society
Extremely rare and difficult to maintain
Almost inevitable use of force to break people/shatter institutions (violence central)
Political attitude= radical or reactionary
Examples: China´s Cultural Revolution (1960s), Hitler under Nazi Germany (1930s- 1945)
Modernization & Non-Democratic Rule:
Strong correlation between lack of modernization and nondemocratic rule (but does not equal causation)
Can be uneven and unstable —> creating openings for strong leaders who can institute nondemocratic regimes to restore order
Elites & Non-Democratic Rule:
Elites in highly unequal societies often reinforce non-democratic structures incentivizing elites to maintain power and resources
Resource Trap/ Resource Curse
When a country has a national resource (like oil or minerals) and they experience less economic growth and worse development outcomes than countries with fewer resources, often due to corruption, poor governance, and reliance on volatile commodity markets
When a country has a national resource that is really valuable and the leader of the country uses the money from the resource to enrich themselves and not the people
What International Relations lead to Non-Democratic Rule?
War, Occupation, and Imperialism
^ Outcomes of this includes: poorly drawn borders, uneven modernization, weak autonomy and capacity, and international support for nondemocratic regimes
Non- Democratic Regimes and Civil Society
Non-democratic regimes tend to have weaker civil societies
The more authoritarian, the lower the civil society
May be result of leaders actions to remove civic groups (cooperation) to consolidate control
Civil Society
Individual engagement that is non-political
Surveillance
Systematic monitoring of individuals by the state, often without their consent or knowledge
Coercion
Use of force to maintain political control
Co-optation
Incorporating individuals into a regime for support
Forms of Co-Optation
Corporatism, Clientelism, and Kleptocracy
Corporatism
Only limited stat-sanctioned organizations allowed
Approves only one single labor union to represent all labor in the country
Clientelism
Government bribes individuals by giving benefits/favors in exchange for political support
(Less a method, but more of a behavior)
Rent Seeking (Form of Clientelism)
Parts of state/government domains are ¨rented out¨ to supporters
Patrimonialism (part/form of clientelism)
Ruler depends on a collection of supporters in the state who gain direct benefits from that rule (ethnic groups, clans, religious groups etc.)
Ruler distributes rewards to gain support
Kleptocracy
Rule by theft
Government exploiting resources for personal gain
Authoritarian regime striping the state for its resources
Personality Cults
Leader´s charisma generates authority and loyalty (Ex: Hitler during Nazi Germany)
Can Non-Democratic rule be legitimate?
Yes, there can be charismatic, traditional, and rational legitimacy (Charisma= Mao, Tradition= Monarchs, Rationality= Rule by unelected ´experts´)
Different Models of Non-Democratic Rule:
Personal- Rule by ONE person, resting on the idea that an individual alone is fit to rule
Military- rule by the armed forces of a state
Theocracy- a regime in which rule is based on appeals to religious and devine approval (Ex: Iran)
One-Party- A single political organization monopolizes politics (Ex: China through Communist Party)
Illiberal- rule by an elected leadership through procedures of questionable democratic legitimacy (Ex: Nigeria)
Personal and Monarchical Rule
Claim that one person alone is fit to rule the country
Ruler not subject of the state (but rather its protector or embodiment)
Often justified through charismatic or traditional legitimacy (cult of personality)
Military Rule
Military seizes control of the state (coup d´etat)
Common in Latin America
Relatively recent development
Often lacks a specific ideology
Many military non-democratic regimes transition to democracy, but not all
Coup d´etat
Military seizes control of the state
Bureaucratic Authoritarianism
A system where the government is run by state officials/bureacracy and the military, who enforce strict, top-down control in the name of order and efficiency (technocratic leadership), instead of relying on the more flexible, people-driven decision-making process of a democracy
Leaders argue that their rule is "rational" and based on practical needs, whereas they view democracy as potentially "emotional" or unpredictable because it involves more public input and debate.
One-Party Rule
Single party monopolizes political power
Leader of the Party = leader of the state (Ex: China)
Co-optation is the primary feature of system
Benefits given to party members in return for support
Leadership uses the party to mobilize and spread propaganda as needed
Theocracy:
Government ruled by religious leaders who claim to represent divine authority, with religious faith as the core of its political system (¨Rule by God¨)
Theocratic regimes can be based on various religions and have appeared at different points in history, often pursued by fundamentalists
Weak example of theocracy= Iran (Partial Theocratic)
Illiberal/hybrid regimes
Weakly institutionalized regimes with democratic features.
Can’t be categorized as free but cannot be categorized as unfree either
Executives typically hold tremendous power (president, prime minister, monarch, etc) (executives rely on referenda)
Democratic processes not well respected
Media under state control
State institutions under direct control of government (politicized)
Often considered a ¨ Halfway house¨ - will become more democratic over time - but not necessarily
Can be state as democracy degrades/slips
Nondemocratic Regime
Political regime that is controlled by a small group of individuals who exercise power over the state without being constitutionally responsible to the public
State Violence
War between two states
Political Violence
Politically motivated violence by non-state actors.
Often goal is to become new ruler of state (regime change)
Not good for democracy/ violence is problematic for democracy
Three explanations regarding the origins/causes of political violence:
Institutions- Weak, corrupt, or unjust political systems can breed violence, as people may see no other way to enact change or address grievances.
Idea/ideational- Extreme ideologies and beliefs can justify violence as a means to achieve political or social goals.
some ideologies even find that there is value in violence
Individual- Personal motives, including psychological factors or socioeconomic hardships, can drive individuals to participate in acts of political violence.
people who feel oppressed and like they have nothing else to lose are more likely to be violent
Atomization
Creating Isolation among the population through fear
Forms of Political Violence:
2 core types: Revolution and Terrorism; but can take any form (ie. riots, assassinations, civil wars, etc)
Revolution
Mass uprising to fundamentally transform the regime
Possible causes of Revolution:
Relative Deprivation- Rapid economic progress raises public expectations, and when these go unmet, resentment builds, sparking revolutionary sentiment.
Institutions- States weakened by war or instability may attempt reforms that unintentionally fuel dissent.
Organizations- Revolutionary movements succeed when opposition groups are ideologically aligned and have international support.
Terrorism:
Small group using coercion to seek change in regime or policy
Targets CIVILIANS to pressure government
You cannot negotiate with terrorists, they aren’t open for negotiation
Possible causes of terrorism:
Religious ideology/apocalyptic beliefs
Nihilism
Humiliation and despair: only self worth comes from a terror group (most common form of recruit to a terrorist group)
Nihilism
Belief that violence is inherently meaningful
Strategic goals of terrorists:
Disrupting negotiated settlements to create chaos
Preventing political and economic development
Guerilla Warfare
Targeting GOVERNMENT for regime change
Relative Deprivation Model
Model that predicts revolution when public expectations outpace the rate of domestic change
Relative deprivation- Unmet expectations due to rapid economic growth
Elements necessary for an action to be considered terrorism:
Carried out by non-state actors
Has political goals
Targets civilians
Terrorism and Legitimacy:
Terrorists can undermine legitimacy by making governments look incompetent and highlight dissatisfaction
Terrorists present THEIR views as legitimate
Terrorism and religious motivations:
Religious Fundamentalism- Aims to restore and idealized, ¨pure¨ community by replacing secular law with religious law
Response to Modernization- Rejects the instability brought by rapid social and economic changes, often through violent means
Justification for Violence- Fundamentalist doctrine can support violence, especially where beliefs are utopian or messianic, framing opponents as threats to a "divine" order.
State response to terrorists and revolutionaries: Repression or Reform?
Repression: May eliminate immediate threat but leads to more resentment later
Reform: May satisfy some demands but can encourage more demands later
Advanced Democracies
Stable political institutions with wealthy economies
Common Characteristics of an advanced democracy:
Economic development
Freedom and equality
Economic development in advanced democracies:
Small agricultural sectors
Industrial sectors shrinking
Service sectors growing
Large Variations in Freedom and Equality
Personal Liberties: in some countries have more freedom than in other countries; Ex: Abortion permitted in Canada but restricted in Korea
Variation in levels of Economic freedom: Prostituion permitted in New Zealand but not in USA
Political Participation: Voting is compulsory in Australia and Brazil
Two trends that may gradually destroy advanced democracies:
International integration- Shifts key state functions to international organizations (Ex: WTO, NAFTA, EU, MERCOSUR, ASEAN)
Devolution- Transfers authority from central government to local and regional governments, creating semi-autonomous regions (e.g., in Spain and the UK) and reducing centralized control.
Post Industrial Evolution In Advanced Democracies:
Most of the economy is engaged in services rather than the creation of tangible goods
The European Union:
A political institution composed of European Countries (27/28) that have economic and social cooperation
Integration has been a slow process, taking place over decades
Origins: After WWII with a goal of preventing another European War, Functional Cooperation on Coal and Steel
Democracy Deficit of the EU
Many see the EU as driven by bureaucrats
It lacks many avenues of accountability to voters (they can only directly elect a small portion of decision makers)
Single currency union has removed the ability of the individual countries to freely set their own monetary policy
EU Instituions:
Political Executive: The European Council (members= heads of state or government)
Bureaucratic Executive: The European Commission (members= Cabinet Ministers)
Legislature: The Council of the EU and European Parliament (Council Members= Cabinet minister from member state governments, Role= Sets the general direction of the EU) (Parliament members= directly elected by voters, Roles= passes legislation and budget)
Judicial: European Court of Justice (Members= High Court chosen by member states)
2 Views on EU Governance:
Intergovernmental Cooperation: Controlled by its member states, with major decisions made through negotiation among national leaders
Supranational Institution: The EU is governed by its own institutions, limiting national governments through EU rules and procedures, often advancing integration via crisis management
Other examples of international integration:
World Trade Organization (WTO)- 1994, Judicial process can rule on national laws
North American Free Trade Agreement- Trade policy set through international treaty with some environmental and labor standards
MERCOSUR (Southern Common Market)- An economic and political agreement among Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, and Venezuela
Different causes for Devolution:
Improve representation of minorities
Bring citizens together/closer to decision making (engage citizens)
Increase efficiency (varied results)
Integration vs. Devolution
Integration = Aggregation of powers to supranational organizations
Devolution= Transfer of power to regional or local governments
Post-Materialism:
Concerns for social ends, after basic needs are met
Social and political orientation that prioritizes values like self-expression, environmental protection, quality of life, and social equality over material or economic concerns
Post Material Values vs. Modern Values
Modern values= Rationalism and industry
Material values= Individual consumption