1/35
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Amicus Curiae Brief
Written legal argument filed by a non-party to provide extra data, perspectives, or legal reasoning and influence a SCOTUS/appellate decision
Appellate jurisdiction
Legal power of a higher court to review a lower court’s decision and check for mistakes in how the law was applied
Attorney general
Head of the Department of Justice and the federal government’s chief legal officer
Binding precedent
Past legal decision from a higher court that lower courts must follow when handling cases with similar facts and legal questions
Class action lawsuit
Lawsuit where a small number of people sue on behalf of all people in similar circumstances
Common law
Legal framework where court decisions and past rulings serve as a primary source of law alongside written statues
Concurring opinion
Separate written statement by a SCOTUS justice who agrees with the winning side’s outcome but uses different/additional legal reasoning to get there
Department of Justice
Executive branch department that enforces federal laws, prosecutes federal crimes, and represents the US government in legal matters
Dissenting opinion
Written statement by one or more SCOTUS justice who voted against the winning side, explaining why they disagree with the majority opinion
Defendant
Person, group, or entity accused of a crime in a criminal case or sued by a plaintiff in a civil case
In forma pauperis
Method that allows a poor person to have their case heard in federal court without paying standard fees
Injunction
A court order telling a party or government official to stop doing an action OR to do one to prevent permanent harm
Judicial activism
Judicial philosophy where the courts use judicial review aggressively to overturn laws, executive actions, or past legal precedents
Judicial review
Power of the courts to declare laws, executive actions, and state policies unconstitutional
Judicial self-restraint
Unelected judges use judicial review narrowly, deferring to existing constitutional/case precedent and policy choices made by elected legislative and executive branches.
Litmus test
Single question asked of a judicial/political nominee to gauge ideological stance – usually controversial take
Majority opinion
Official written decision of SCOTUS reflecting review of 5 or more justices
Original jurisdiction
Court’s power to hear and decide a case for the first time – trial court where facts/evidence gathered
Per curium opinion
Brief and unsigned ruling issued by SCOTUS as a collective body
Persuasive precedent
Past court ruling that a judge may consider use for guidance but not required to follow
Petitioner
Party who brings a formal legal request to a court
Plaintiff
Person or group that starts a civil lawsuit by filing a legal complaint against another party
Plea Bargain
Negotiated agreement between a prosecutor and a defendant where the defendant pleads guilty / no contest in exchange for a lighter sentence, reduced charges, or dropped counts
Precedent
Legal rule or principle established in an earlier court decision that guides or binds courts when deciding future cases with similar facts
Respondent
Person who answers questions in a public opinion poll, survey, or interview or party defending against a petition/appeal
Rule of four
Supreme Court’s custom where at least four of the nine justices must vote to grant a writ of certiorari so the court will hear a case
Senatorial courtesy
Informal custom where president consults with home-state senators and defers to their opposition when picking local federal officials or district judges
Solicitor General
Senior DOJ official who represents federal gov in cases before SCOTUS
Sovereign immunity
Legal doctrine stating that a government cannot be sued in court unless it gives explicit consent
stare decisis
Legal doctrine requiring courts to follow historical precedents when deciding similar cases
Strict constructionist
Judicial philosophy that interprets constitution narrowly and limiting federal government’s power only to what it directly states
Supreme Court
Highest federal court of US + established by Article 3 of Constitution – judicial review
Torts
Civil wrong that causes harm or loss ot a person/property resulting in civil liability for monetary damages
US Circuit Court of Appeals
13 intermediate appellate courts in federal judiciary that review district court and agency decisions for legal errors rather than holding new trials
US District Courts
94 trial-level courts at the bottom of the federal judicial hierarchy where nearly all federal civil and criminal cases begin
Writ of Certiorari
Formal order from a higher court telling a lower court to send up the case records for review