1/43
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
according to Aristotle, the human good is closely related to…
the proper activity of a human being and activity of the soul in accord with virtue
why does Kant believe the good will is good
because it is good in itself, not because of its consequences or the ends it achieves
what do Aristotle’s virtue ethics invite us to focus on?
what kind of person we become when we act a certain way
hypothetical imperative
if you want X, you must do Y (a possible action is necessary as a means to the attainment of something else that one wills)
According to Aristotle, how do we acquire virtues?
by first doing virtuous actions, just as we learn a craft by doing it
by imitating the virtue of virtuous people and forming habits
first formulation of the categorical imperative
the formula of universal law
the formula of universal law
i ought to never act except in such a way that I could also will that my maxim become a universal law
Aristotle’s doctrine of the mean
moral virtue is between two vices, one of excess and one of deficiency
virtue is a state concerned with choice, lying in a mean relative to us, this being determined by reason and in the way in which the man of practical wisdom would determine it
the mean is relative to us and determined by a person of practical wisdom
phronimos
a person of practical wisdom: someone who’s morally mature, makes good choices, finds balance, and lives a flourishing life (eudaimonia).
according to kant, which are good only under the guidance of good will?
talents of the mind (intelligence, wit, judgment)
temperaments (courage, resolutness, perseverance)
gifts of fortune (power, riches, health, happiness)
What does aristotle say is the proper activity of a human being
reasoning
second formulation of the categorical imperative
the formula of humanity
the formula of humanity
act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means
According to Aristotle, how does a virtuous person feel when performing a virtuous action?
pleasure
Kant’s concept of the will
the will is our own capacity to control our behavior through reasoning and deciding
only the good will is morally assessable
In Aristotle’s doctrine of the mean, how is the mean determined?
by reason, and in the way that a man of practical wisdom would determine it
phronesis
practical reason in virtue
practical reason in virtue
the engine behind virtue (how we apply moral insight to real life)
the virtuous person has practical wisdom ( the ability to judge well + doing the right thing for the right reasons)
Kant’s view of duty
the need to act out of reverance for the law
an action has moral worth only if it is done from duty
Shopkeeper example
Kant
a shop owner has fair prices
he does it because its good for business → morally wrong
he does it just because its the right thing to do→ morally right
The will
Kant: the capacity to act according to principles or laws that we choose through reason
Kant’s relationship of reason and the will
reason rules the will
reason’s role is to direct the will toward the unconditional good, not just happiness
the will is the capacity to determine itself to action in accordance with the idea of certain laws
Kant: where does an action’s moral worth come from?
the maxim/ the agent’s reason for doing it
according to formula of humanity, why is making false promises wrong?
it treats the other person as a mere means, not also as an end
it violates the other person’s autonomy
prudence
acting in accordance to your own self interest / hypothetical imperative
Kant: perfect duties
not committing suicide, not making false promises
third formulation of the categorical imperative
autonomy
principle of autonomy
Kant: rational will is self-legislating, it is the source of its own law
the universal validity of moral law derives from the self-legislation of the will
kingdom of ends
Kant: a moral community in which all rational beings treat each other as ends and unite under shared, self legislated laws
a society where each individual is both legislator and subject of the moral law
inquiring murderer
if a murderer came to your door looking for your friend, you wouldn’t be able to lie to him even to save your friend’s life, according to Kant
arguments of inquiring murderer
if the murderer is lying/decieving, we can lie back to him since the maxim of lying could be universalized (the conditions of trust are already violated)
contradiction of the will
a maxim of refusing to develop one’s talents (even though this is possible, no one would want to live in a world where this is true)
imperfect duties
rules that are more flexible
helping others in need
developing one’s talents
Why does Kant claim that only a good will is morally good?
Even if it fails due to bad luck, it still had the right intentions + remains morally good
According to Aristotle, what is necessary to achieve happiness?
external goods like health/wealth/luck
the good of the soul— rational activity in accordance with virtue
Aristotle: two kinds of virtues
moral virtues and intellectual virtues
moral virtues
have to do with character and emotions, are learned through habits (ex. courage)
intellectual virtues
virtues that are taught involving thinking/reasoning (ex. phronesis)
Aristotle: “the good” of an action
if it performs in distinctive function well
consequentialism
the moral status of an action depends on its consequences
utilitarianism
the ultimate value is happiness, we should do what results in the most happiness (impartially considered)
contractualism
the rules are those that we should all agree to as part of the mutually advantageous system of living together in peace
deontology
a formal set of rules to follow