1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Grenville’s problem with trying to use trade laws to extract more revenue from Americans
Smuggling
Customs officers frequently corrupt
Americans evaded most of customs duties as a result
Grenville anti-smuggling measures in 1763
Colonial customs officials - must reside in America, rather than delegating their duties to deputies (and going back to England)
Jurisdiction in revenue cases was transferred from colonial courts to a vice-admiralty court in Halifax, Nova Scotia - here the judge alone would hand down the verdict, no jury - this was to counter the leniency of colonial juries towards smugglers
When was the Sugar Act and Currency Act?
1764
What was the Sugar Act in a nutshell?
A collection of changes to customs duties on foreign goods, which amended the Molasses Act of 1733
Terms of the Sugar Act
Halved the duty on foreign molasses (from 6d to 3d per gallon)
Theoretically beneficial to New England rum distilleries - however, the previous higher duty was largely ignored by officials
The new lower duty, properly enforced, was expected to raise more than its predecessor
Increased import duties on non-British goods that passed through England on their way to the colonies (enumerated commodities): sugar, wine, silk, coffee, indigo, animal hides, iron
Import on French rum and wine prohibited
To be strictly enforced - customs officials fined £500 and disqualified from office for breaches
The Board of Customs commissioners advised that Sugar Act, enforced, would yield how much?
£78,000 per year
Parliament response to Sugar Act
Virtually no opposition in Parliament
Most MPs complacent about situation in American colonies
No sustained American pressure group in Parliament - only 5 Americans sat in Commons 1763-1783
Few British politicians anticipated resistance, also as it only affected New England, where distillers turned molasses into rum
What was the Currency Act in a nutshell?
Prohibited the issue of any new colonial paper money
Terms of the Currency Act
If colonial assemblies issued their own currency (in violation of Act), such legislation was to be considered null and void - any colonial governor who allowed this would be fined, sacked and disqualified from holding any public office in future
Deflationary effects on the already depressed post-war American economy - meant some people had insufficient money to buy goods or to invest
Mostly aimed at Virginia, who had issued lots of paper money during 7 Years’ War
American response in a nutshell
Angered many colonists - kindled their suspicions, New England merchants aggrieved by Sugar Act, challenged colonial legal system, deflationary effects of Currency Act also felt
American suspicions
Britain was essentially taxing Americans who were unrepresented in Parliament
Regarded themselves as good Whigs - believed in popular rights and disliked despotism
Many Americans convinced of the need to guard against attempts to expand executive power by stealth - influence of Earl of Bute (even if not PM), and large peacetime army stationed in colonies
What was American Whiggism?
American Whiggism in the 1760s was that of the first English Whigs who had come to prominence when England seemed to be sliding towards despotism under Charles II and James II
Resisting arbitrary power (power that is not bound by rules, allowing monarchs to do as they wish), upholding political rights and defending the integrity of representative institutions
Supported writings of early eighteenth-century British radical Whigs (1720s) - these condemned ministers for conspiring to undermine traditional freedoms
John Wilkes’ influence
John Wilkes was a radical British MP
Was also the co-editor of the journal North Briton
Demanded freedom of the press and a more democratic Parliament
1763 - criticised the King and accused his ministers of being ‘the tools of despotism and corruption’
Arrested + imprisoned
Soon released but subsequently convicted of libel and fled to France
Sign that British gov. also trampling on British freedoms (as well as American) - British and American hero
By 1765 how many colonial assemblies had sent messages to London arguing that Parliament had abused its power by introducing the Sugar Act?
Nine colonial assemblies - accepted Parliament’s right to regulate trade, but did not accept its right to tax in order to raise revenue in America
Example of colonist who objected to Sugar Act at the Boston Town Meeting May 1764
Samuel Adams, at this meeting, commented on how the colonists’ rights as British people (‘natives of Britain’) were violated, and compared the colonists to slaves. He also voices the idea of ‘no taxation without representation’, and how the Sugar and Currency Acts annihilated the colonists’ ‘Charter Right’ to govern and tax themselves.
Name a colonist who wrote pamphlets against Sugar Act
James Otis - a member of a prominent Massachusetts family
Published an influential pamphlet in 1764, The Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved
In this he criticised Parliament’s new aggressiveness towards the colonies, asserted there should be no taxation in America without the people’s consent
Did most Americans comply with Sugar Act in the end?
Yes - despite the objections of assemblies and Pamphleteers, few were actually directly affected by it, so most Americans complied with it