1/78
A set of vocabulary flashcards defining key concepts in psychology and research methodology, including experimental controls, statistical measures, and ethical principles.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Psychology
The scientific study of behavior and mental processes — it uses research, not just opinion, to explain how and why we think, feel, and act
Critical Thinking
Thinking that doesn't just accept claims at face value — it examines assumptions, weighs evidence, and considers other explanations before drawing a conclusion
Hindsight Bias
The "I-knew-it-all-along" effect: once you find out how something turned out, it feels like it was obvious from the start, even though you couldn't have predicted it beforehand
Overconfidence
Being more sure that your judgments, predictions, or knowledge are correct than the evidence actually supports
Perceiving Order in Random Events
Our brain's habit of finding patterns or streaks in things that are actually just chance (like feeling a coin is "due" to land heads after several tails)
Peer Reviewers
Other experts in the field who evaluate a study's methods and conclusions before it gets published, checking for flaws or unsupported claims
Theory
A well-tested explanation that ties together many observations using a set of principles, and lets scientists predict future behavior or events (bigger and better-supported than a hypothesis)
Hypothesis
A specific, testable prediction that comes from a theory — basically an "if this, then that" statement a study is designed to check
Falsifiable
A hypothesis is falsifiable if it's specific enough that evidence COULD prove it wrong; if nothing could ever disprove a claim, it isn't scientific
Operational Definition
A precise, measurable description of a variable — instead of saying "measure happiness," you'd say "measure the number of times someone smiles in 10 minutes," so anyone could repeat the study the same way
Replication
Redoing a study, often with different people or in a different setting, to see if you get the same results — this is how science checks that a finding is real and not a fluke
Case Study
An in-depth look at one person or small group over time; great for generating ideas and detail, but risky to generalize since one case might not represent everyone
Naturalistic Observation
Watching and recording behavior as it happens in real life, without interfering — you learn what people/animals actually do, but not why (no cause-and-effect conclusions)
Survey
A method that asks a sample of people to report their own attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors, usually through questions — quick way to get info from a lot of people, but depends on honesty
Social Desirability Bias
The tendency for people to shade their survey answers to look better, healthier, or more socially acceptable than they truly feel or behave
Self-Report Bias
Errors that creep into data because people misjudge, misremember, or exaggerate when describing their own thoughts or behaviors
Population
The entire group a researcher wants to draw conclusions about (e.g., "all U.S. teenagers"), even though they usually only study a smaller slice of it
Sample
The smaller subset of the population that's actually studied, used to make inferences about the whole group
Sampling Bias
When the way a sample is selected causes it to not represent the population well, skewing results (e.g., only surveying people at the mall on a Tuesday afternoon)
Random Sample
A sample where every individual in the population has an equal chance of being chosen — the gold standard for making a sample actually representative
Convenience Sampling
Selecting whoever is easiest to reach rather than randomly — fast and cheap, but often unrepresentative and prone to bias
Representative Sample
A sample whose characteristics (age, gender, background, etc.) closely mirror those of the population it's drawn from
Generalizability
How well the results from a study's sample can be applied to the larger population — depends heavily on whether the sample was representative
Correlation
A statistical measure of how strongly two variables rise and fall together — it tells you they're related, but never by itself that one causes the other
Positive Correlation
Two variables move in the same direction — as one goes up, the other tends to go up too (e.g., more study time, higher test scores)
Negative Correlation
Two variables move in opposite directions — as one goes up, the other tends to go down (e.g., more stress, less sleep)
Correlation Coefficient
A number between −1 and +1 that shows both the strength and direction of a relationship between two variables — closer to !!±1!! means a stronger relationship, closer to 0 means a weaker one
Variable
Anything that can change or vary and be measured in a study (age, mood, reaction time, etc.)
Scatterplot
A graph with dots representing pairs of scores for two variables — the pattern of dots shows whether (and how) the variables are related
Illusory Correlation
Perceiving a relationship between two things that either doesn't really exist or is much weaker than it seems (e.g., thinking your phone is "listening" because an ad matched something you talked about once)
Directionality Problem
Even when two variables are correlated, you can't tell which one is causing the other — either could be the cause (e.g., does poor sleep cause depression, or does depression cause poor sleep?)
Third Variable Problem
A hidden, unmeasured factor might be driving both variables in a correlation, making them look related when neither actually causes the other (e.g., ice cream sales and drownings both rise in summer — heat is the third variable)
Regression Toward the Mean
After an unusually extreme score (very high or very low), the next measurement tends to land closer to average — not because anything changed, just statistically likely (e.g., a rookie's amazing first game is often followed by a more "normal" one)
Experiment
A research method where the researcher deliberately manipulates one factor and controls others, to figure out cause and effect
Non-Experimental Methods
Research approaches (case study, correlation, naturalistic observation, survey) that describe or relate behaviors but don't manipulate variables, so they can't establish cause and effect
Experimental Group
The group in an experiment that receives the treatment or condition being tested
Control Group
The group in an experiment that does NOT receive the treatment, used as a baseline for comparison
Independent Variable
The factor the experimenter deliberately changes or manipulates, to see what effect it has
Dependent Variable
The outcome that's measured in an experiment — it "depends on" what happens to the independent variable
Random Assignment
Using chance to place participants into the experimental or control group, which helps make the groups similar before the study begins so differences in results can be credited to the treatment
Single-Blind Procedure
A study where participants don't know which group (treatment or control) they're in, but the researchers do
Double-Blind Procedure
A study where neither the participants nor the researchers interacting with them know who's in which group — this controls for both the placebo effect and experimenter bias
Placebo
A fake treatment (like a sugar pill) with no active ingredient, given to the control group so it can be compared with the real treatment
Placebo Effect
Experiencing real improvement or change simply because you expect a treatment to work, even though you didn't actually get the real treatment
Confounding Variable
An outside factor, other than the independent variable, that could also explain differences in the results — a threat to drawing a clean cause-and-effect conclusion
Experimenter Bias
When a researcher's own expectations unintentionally influence how they treat participants or interpret results
Validity
Whether a test, measure, or study actually measures what it claims to measure
Reliability
Whether a test or measure produces consistent results if you repeat it
Quantitative Research
Research that collects numerical data that can be measured and statistically analyzed (e.g., test scores, reaction times)
Likert Scale
A rating scale (e.g., "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree," often 1-5 or 1-7) used to quantify attitudes or opinions in surveys
Qualitative Research
Research that collects non-numerical data — like descriptions, themes, or quotes — to explore experiences or meanings in depth
Structured Interview
An interview where every participant is asked the same set of questions in the same order, making responses easier to compare
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
A committee at a research institution that reviews studies before they start, to make sure they meet ethical standards and protect participants
Informed Consent
Giving participants enough information about a study up front so they can knowingly and voluntarily agree to take part
Informed Assent
Similar to informed consent, but for participants (usually minors) who can't legally give full consent themselves — they agree to participate after being told what's involved, alongside a parent/guardian's consent
Protect from Harm
The ethical principle that researchers must avoid putting participants at risk of physical or psychological harm beyond normal everyday risk
Confidentiality
The ethical obligation to keep participants' data and identities private
Debriefing
After a study ends, explaining its true purpose (and revealing any deception used) to participants
Research Confederates
People who appear to be regular participants in a study but are secretly working with the researcher, often to create a specific social situation to observe reactions to
Descriptive Statistics
Numbers that summarize and describe a data set (like averages or percentages) without drawing broader conclusions beyond that data
Histogram/Bar Graph
A chart using bars to show how frequently different values or categories occur in a data set
Measures of Central Tendency
The general term for the three ways of describing the "center" or typical score in a data set: mean, median, and mode
Mode
The value that appears most often in a data set
Mean
The mathematical average of a data set — add up all values and divide by how many there are
Median
The middle value in a data set when all scores are lined up from lowest to highest
Percentile Rank
The percentage of scores in a data set that fall at or below a particular score (e.g., scoring in the 90th percentile means you scored higher than 90% of people)
Percentage
A way of expressing a value as a portion out of 100
Bimodal Distribution
A data set with two distinct "peaks" or most-frequent values, rather than just one
Skewed Distribution
A data set that isn't symmetrical — most scores cluster on one side with a "tail" stretching out on the other
Positive/Right-Tailed Skew
A distribution where most scores are low but a few unusually high scores stretch the tail out to the right
Negative/Left-Tailed Skew
A distribution where most scores are high but a few unusually low scores stretch the tail out to the left
Measures of Variation
The general term for statistics (like range and standard deviation) that describe how spread out or spread apart scores in a data set are
Range
The difference between the highest and lowest scores in a data set — a quick but rough measure of spread
Standard Deviation
A number showing, on average, how far scores in a data set stray from the mean — a low value means scores cluster tightly around the mean, a high value means they're spread out
Normal Curve
The bell-shaped pattern many natural traits follow, where most scores cluster near the mean and fewer scores appear as you move toward either extreme
Inferential Statistics
Statistical methods used to determine whether results from a sample can be generalized (inferred) to apply to the larger population
Meta-Analysis
A method that statistically combines the results of many separate studies on the same topic to get a more powerful, reliable overall conclusion
Statistical Significance
A statistical measure of how likely it is that a study's result happened just by chance rather than reflecting a real effect — a low likelihood of chance means the result is "statistically significant"
Effect Size
A number indicating how large or meaningful a study's result actually is, separate from whether it's statistically significant — a result can be significant but still small in real-world impact