1/45
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
q1 what is culture to simmel
Culture is the objectification of life: subjective energies crystallize into forms (art, norms, fashion, social practices).
These forms are socially shared, but originate in individual life.
Culture is not reducible to objects; it is a process of mediation between individual and society.
q1 simmel culture exists between people?
Society itself is not a thing but a network of interactions.
Culture consists in the forms that stabilize interaction: patterns, expectations, symbols.
Culture is what allows individuals to experience themselves as part of a social whole without losing individuality entirely.
q1 simmel how culture functions
Culture functions by structuring interaction while still allowing differentiation.
It provides shared meaning but does not eliminate individuality.
q1 simmel examples of interaction
Sociology of the Meal:
Culture organizes biological necessity into a social ritual.
Adornment:
Adornment is a cultural form that expresses a deep tension between being-for-oneself and being-for-others.
One adorns oneself to express individuality
But only through social recognition
q1 simmel do we need culture?
For Simmel, culture is indispensable.
Without culture:
No stable interaction
No recognition
No individuation within society
Even attempts to escape culture (e.g. radical individuality) rely on cultural forms to be intelligible.
q1 simmel problem of culture
Culture necessarily externalizes individuality.
Cultural forms:
Become autonomous
Begin to dominate subjective life
This is the tragedy of culture:
Forms meant to express life come to constrain it.
q1 simmel culture problem example
Adornment shows this vividly:
Adornment heightens individuality
But only by submitting it to impersonal, social form
Individuality becomes legible only by being stylized
Culture both enables individuality and flattens it.
q1 benjamin what is culture
Culture is the historically produced way a society preserves, transmits, and experiences meaning — and it is never neutral.
Cultural artifacts are inseparable from:
Technology
Power
Historical memory
q1 benjamin culture’s dark side
Culture is never innocent.
Every cultural document is also a document of barbarism.
Culture preserves domination by aestheticizing the past.
q1 benjamin how culture functions
Culture organizes how the past appears to us.
Historicism treats culture as:
Continuous
Progressive
Neutral
q1 benjamin photography is important because
It shatters aura
It reveals forgotten faces, marginal lives, unconscious gestures
Culture becomes a site where history flashes up
q1 benjamin do we need culture?
Benjamin does not think we can do without culture.
But we must redeem culture from its ideological use.
Culture should:
Interrupt complacency
Awaken historical consciousness
Refuse narratives of progress
q1 benjamin probs w culture
Culture easily becomes:
Monumental
Reverential
Complicit with domination
The danger is not culture itself, but how it is narrated and received.
q1 adorno what is culture
Culture under late capitalism becomes administered.
It is integrated into systems of:
Production
Opinion
Social control
Culture is no longer autonomous; it is functional.
q1 adorno culture’s functionalism
In Opinion, Delusion, Society:
Culture trains people to mistake opinion for truth
Subjectivity becomes hardened, defensive, narcissistic
Culture no longer cultivates judgment — it reproduces conformity.
q1 adorno problems with culture
Culture’s only remaining promise lies in critical negativity.
Thinking itself becomes a cultural act of resistance.
Refusing easy answers is not resignation — it is fidelity to truth.
q2 simmel what is history
For Simmel, history is not simply a record of past events.
Something counts as historical only insofar as it is understood.
History is therefore not identical with the past.
An event does not become historical merely because it happened, but because it is situated within an interpretive framework.
q2 simmel what is time
Time is not an objective container in which events are placed.
Time becomes meaningful only through relations between contents.
Temporal location is relational, not absolute.
From The Problem of Historical Time:
You cannot assign historical meaning by simply saying when something occurred.
A date alone is insufficient for historical understanding.
q2 simmel historical time is constructed not given
An event is historical when:
It is placed in relation to other events
It forms part of a coherent interpretive complex
History is therefore atemporal in principle:
Understanding is not bound to a specific moment
We can grasp a historical structure independently of its empirical time location
q2 simmel historical documents
Documents (texts, images, artifacts) are not self-interpreting.
They become historical only when:
Integrated into a broader interpretive structure
Related to other phenomena
Without interpretation, documents remain mere remnants, not history.
q2 simmel critique of historicism
Historicism assumes:
History is a continuous sequence of facts
Meaning is produced by temporal placement alone
Simmel rejects this:
Continuity is imposed by interpretation
Chronology ≠ understanding
q2 benjamin what is history
Benjamin rejects history as:
Linear
Progressive
Continuous
History is not a story of advancement but a field of struggle.
From the Theses on the Philosophy of History:
History is written by the victors.
Cultural artifacts preserve domination by presenting the past as resolved.
q2 benjamin what is time
Benjamin distinguishes:
Homogeneous, empty time → the time of progress narratives
Jetztzeit (now-time) → moments where past and present collide
politically structured
q2 benjamin historical time
Historical time is non-continuous.
Meaning emerges in moments of rupture, not smooth succession.
The past becomes legible only when it flashes up in the present.
This is crucial:
The past is not fixed
It can be reactivated, redeemed, or lost depending on the present moment
q2 benjamin historical documents
Documents are not neutral evidence.
Every document of culture is also a document of barbarism.
Images, texts, photographs:
Contain suppressed histories
Reveal what official narratives conceal
From Little History of Photography:
Photography captures:
Unintended details
Forgotten faces
Marginal lives
These details disrupt dominant historical narratives.
q2 benjamin critique of historicism
Historicism:
Treats the past as closed
Narrates history as inevitable progress
Benjamin’s objection:
This neutralizes suffering
It reconciles us to domination
q2 adorno what is history
History is not a meaningful totality.
There is no rational narrative that redeems what has happened.
History is marked by:
Domination
Regression
Repetition of catastrophe
Adorno rejects any philosophy of history that claims necessity or progress.
q2 adorno what is time
Time under modern society is administered.
It is standardized, instrumentalized, and emptied of qualitative meaning.
Temporal experience is shaped by:
Capitalism
Routine
Mass culture
q2 adorno what is historical time
Historical time is non-identical:
Past suffering cannot be integrated into a coherent story
Attempts to do so falsify it
History does not culminate in reconciliation.
This is why Adorno resists:
Closure
Synthesis
Redemptive narratives
q2 adorno historical documents
Documents and cultural products:
Often conceal domination
Normalize injustice
“Opinion” culture presents history as settled and obvious.
From Opinion, Delusion, Society:
Society internalizes false historical narratives
Individuals accept the present as natural and inevitable
q2 adorno critique of historicism
Historicism falsely:
Justifies the present as the outcome of necessity
Rationalizes domination
To say “that’s just how history unfolded” is already ideological.
q2 adorno WHY critique matters?
From Why Still Philosophy? and Resignation:
Philosophy must:
Refuse reconciliation
Keep faith with the suffering of the past
Thought is historical precisely because it resists closure.
q3 simmel individuality thru social forms
For Simmel, the individual and society are not opposites.
Society is nothing over and above interactions between individuals.
The individual is always already social, but not dissolved into society.
q3 simmel society
Society arises through:
Reciprocal interaction
Mutual orientation of individuals toward one another
q3 simmel society and social forms
Individuals participate in society through social forms:
Roles
Norms
Practices
Styles of interaction
These forms:
Structure interaction
But do not fully determine individuality
q3 simmel individuality and culture
Culture mediates between:
Subjective life (inner experience, vitality)
Objective forms (institutions, norms, cultural products)
Individuality develops through engagement with cultural forms.
q3 simmel tragedy of culture
As objective culture expands, individuals struggle to appropriate it.
This produces the tragedy of culture:
Culture enables individuality
Culture overwhelms individuality
q3 simmel individuality as differentiation + adornment
Modern individuality is not isolation, but difference.
Individuals assert themselves by:
Stylization
Distinction
Selective participation in social life
From Adornment:
Adornment expresses individuality
But only by appealing to social recognition
The individual becomes visible by submitting to form
q3 simmel freedom and constraint
Social forms constrain individuals
But without them, individuality would be:
Inarticulate
Unrecognizable
Freedom exists within form, not outside it.
q3 adorno the damaged individual
Adorno is far more pessimistic than Simmel.
In late capitalism, society:
Penetrates deeply into subjectivity
Shapes individuals from the inside
q3 adorno individual and society + delusion
Society presents itself as:
Natural
Inevitable
Rational
Individuals internalize social norms as their own thoughts.
From Opinion, Delusion, Society:
“Opinion” gives the illusion of individuality
But opinions are socially standardized
Subjectivity becomes rigid, defensive, conformist
q3 adorno pseudo-individuality
Culture encourages individuals to feel unique
While offering only:
Pre-structured choices
Standardized forms of self-expression
This is pseudo-individualization:
Difference without autonomy
Choice without freedom
q3 adorno psychology and domination
From Freudian Theory and the Pattern of Fascist Propaganda:
Individuals are shaped psychologically to:
Desire authority
Submit to domination
Identify with power
Society exploits:
Narcissism
Fear
Resentment
q3 adorno is individuality still possible?
Adorno does not claim individuality is dead.
But it is:
Damaged
Fragile
Non-identical with social roles
q3 adorno true individuality lies in
Critical thought
Refusal to conform
Resistance to false reconciliation
Thinking becomes an ethical act.
q3 adorno culture and individuality
Culture no longer cultivates individuals
It integrates them
The individual survives only as negativity:
Saying no
Not fitting
Not being fully absorbed