Case Law

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 1 person
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/21

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

22 Terms

1
New cards

United States v. Blarek (1998)

Argues for sentencing based on rehabilitation for non-violent drug offenders.

2
New cards

Payne v. Tennessee (1991)

Justifies the use of victim impact statements in sentencing.

3
New cards

Gregg v. Georgia (1976)

Supports the constitutionality of the death penalty under guided discretion.

4
New cards

BVerfGE 45, 187 (1977)

Emphasizes that life imprisonment must respect human dignity.

5
New cards

Rogers v. Tennessee (2001)

Challenges retroactive application of criminal laws, advocating fair notice.

6
New cards

State v. Tippetts (2002)

Discusses omissions and legal duty to act in criminal liability.

7
New cards

OLG Zweibrücken (1982)

Questions the voluntary nature of a physical act under actus reus.

8
New cards

State v. Miranda (1998)

Differentiates between voluntary and involuntary acts in intoxication cases.

9
New cards

Martin v. State (1944)

Argues that involuntary presence negates actus reus for public intoxication.

10
New cards

People v. Baker (2004)

Analyzes awareness or recklessness in negligence-driven crimes.

11
New cards

Leather Strap Case (1955)

Distinguishes between negligence and intent in accidental harm cases.

12
New cards

People v. Kibbe (1974)

Analyzes proximate cause and foreseeability relating to death.

13
New cards

Leather Spray Case (1990)

Addresses indirect causation in product liability harm cases.

14
New cards

People v. Lehnert (2007)

Focuses on conspiracy and substantial steps toward committing a crime.

15
New cards

Barwurz Case (1997)

Examines the boundary between preparation and execution in attempts.

16
New cards

Pinkerton v. United States (1946)

Holds all conspirators liable for foreseeable acts in conspiracy cases.

17
New cards

Landser Case (2005)

Discusses incitement or conspiracy through media or expression.

18
New cards

State v. Tally (1894)

Establishes accomplice liability through aiding or abetting.

19
New cards

BGHSt 11, 268 (1958)

Analyzes significant participation for assigning criminal liability.

20
New cards

People v. Craig (1991)

Applies the necessity defense to prevent greater harm.

21
New cards

BGHSt 49, 166 (2004)

Assesses whether consent is a valid defense in assault cases.

22
New cards

BGH NStZ 1987, 172 (1986)

Evaluates proportionality and immediacy in self-defense cases.