rule of law and restraints on power

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/14

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

15 Terms

1
New cards

divine right of Kings

  • did not manifest in England until after 1603

  • James I of England was an exponent

    • reign would be characterised by the English civil wars

2
New cards

english civil wars

  • dispute was about where the ultimate power rested, with the king, with the parliament or with the common law

  • during much of it, members of parliament and common law lawyers were on the same side

  • dispute played out in courts, in parliament and on the battlefield

  • monarchs ultimately lost and Charles I was executed in 1649

3
New cards

the King’s relationship with the common law

  • James I set out the theory of the divine right of Kings

    • his attorney general argued that according to natural law, only absolute monarchy could avoid confusion

  • common law lawyers disputed this, Coke was influential

  • people held a range of beliefs at the time, including faith in the common law and the will of a conquering King

4
New cards

what power started the english civil wars

  • the King could govern by his prerogative alone as he held the power to convene or dismiss parliament

5
New cards

what does Sommerville suggest

  • lawyers believed no amount of abstract reasoning could rival the wisdom of the law

  • common law was argued to be the best of all possible laws because it was an ancient custom

  • held to be rational by being compatible with natural law and flexible

6
New cards

development of parliament

  • Parliament grew alongside the courts

  • most significant early parliament is thought to be the model parliament called by Edward I in 1295

    • called it because he needed funds and wanted to consult with a range of people before increasing taxes

  • parliament gets its power and authority from the common law

  • as the parliamentarians were forced to enter more extreme experiments in the civil war they came to abandon the claim that common laws were superior to statute

7
New cards

Bonham’s case (1610)

  • thomas Bonham brought an action for false imprisonment against the President and censors of the college of physicians in London

    • college argued that it had power given to it by the King and parliament to observe who should practice medicine

  • Bonham continued practising after he was found unable to practice

  • common law prohibited a person from judging in their own cause, judges held in favour of Bonham

8
New cards

relationship between the King, the parliament and the common law

  • the prerogative power of the King was made up of the rights of the King who governed

    • one aspect was dispensing power

    • the King could dispense with the operation of a statute or exempt someone from being subject to it

  • parliament was called irregularly, so this was needed when statutes were defective

9
New cards

case of prohibitions (1607)

  • judges had issued a writ of prohibition to the court of high commission (a court that exercised royal prerogative)

  • archbishop referred the matter to the King, arguing that the King had the power to judge all cases as his power was God given

  • Coke responded by renouncing the power of the King

10
New cards

case of proclamations (1611)

  • The king, by his proclamations cannot create any offence which was not an offence before, for then he may alter the law of the land”

    • “For if he may create an offence where none is, upon that ensues fine and imprisonment”

  • “The law of England is divided into three parts, common law, statute law and custom: but the king’s proclamation is none of them”

11
New cards

religious components of disputes about power

  • English feared that a Catholic King would reintroduce catholicism over protestantism, so when James I was ruling concerns emphasised limiting his power

  • Presbyterians rejected the church hierarchy, electing elders instead

12
New cards

the restoration

  • when parliament invited charles ii back to rule in 1660, he had to accept limitations on his power

  • still tensions, and the resolution was the bill of rights

    • trimmed the royal prerogative

13
New cards

rule of law and the glorious revolution

  • rule of law is crucial in ensuring bodies don’t make oppressive laws

  • much significance in the English struggle for constitutional restraint of the King’s power for the future colonies of British Empire

14
New cards

what restrains judges power

  • peers

  • having to right their judgments down

  • being well learned in the law

  • the audience

15
New cards

main features of the rule of law

  • absolute supremacy or predominance of regular law as opposed to influence of arbitrary power

  • equality before the law

  • constitution is not the source but the consequence of rights of individuals as enforced by courts