1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
divine right of Kings
did not manifest in England until after 1603
James I of England was an exponent
reign would be characterised by the English civil wars
english civil wars
dispute was about where the ultimate power rested, with the king, with the parliament or with the common law
during much of it, members of parliament and common law lawyers were on the same side
dispute played out in courts, in parliament and on the battlefield
monarchs ultimately lost and Charles I was executed in 1649
the King’s relationship with the common law
James I set out the theory of the divine right of Kings
his attorney general argued that according to natural law, only absolute monarchy could avoid confusion
common law lawyers disputed this, Coke was influential
people held a range of beliefs at the time, including faith in the common law and the will of a conquering King
what power started the english civil wars
the King could govern by his prerogative alone as he held the power to convene or dismiss parliament
what does Sommerville suggest
lawyers believed no amount of abstract reasoning could rival the wisdom of the law
common law was argued to be the best of all possible laws because it was an ancient custom
held to be rational by being compatible with natural law and flexible
development of parliament
Parliament grew alongside the courts
most significant early parliament is thought to be the model parliament called by Edward I in 1295
called it because he needed funds and wanted to consult with a range of people before increasing taxes
parliament gets its power and authority from the common law
as the parliamentarians were forced to enter more extreme experiments in the civil war they came to abandon the claim that common laws were superior to statute
Bonham’s case (1610)
thomas Bonham brought an action for false imprisonment against the President and censors of the college of physicians in London
college argued that it had power given to it by the King and parliament to observe who should practice medicine
Bonham continued practising after he was found unable to practice
common law prohibited a person from judging in their own cause, judges held in favour of Bonham
relationship between the King, the parliament and the common law
the prerogative power of the King was made up of the rights of the King who governed
one aspect was dispensing power
the King could dispense with the operation of a statute or exempt someone from being subject to it
parliament was called irregularly, so this was needed when statutes were defective
case of prohibitions (1607)
judges had issued a writ of prohibition to the court of high commission (a court that exercised royal prerogative)
archbishop referred the matter to the King, arguing that the King had the power to judge all cases as his power was God given
Coke responded by renouncing the power of the King
case of proclamations (1611)
The king, by his proclamations cannot create any offence which was not an offence before, for then he may alter the law of the land”
“For if he may create an offence where none is, upon that ensues fine and imprisonment”
“The law of England is divided into three parts, common law, statute law and custom: but the king’s proclamation is none of them”
religious components of disputes about power
English feared that a Catholic King would reintroduce catholicism over protestantism, so when James I was ruling concerns emphasised limiting his power
Presbyterians rejected the church hierarchy, electing elders instead
the restoration
when parliament invited charles ii back to rule in 1660, he had to accept limitations on his power
still tensions, and the resolution was the bill of rights
trimmed the royal prerogative
rule of law and the glorious revolution
rule of law is crucial in ensuring bodies don’t make oppressive laws
much significance in the English struggle for constitutional restraint of the King’s power for the future colonies of British Empire
what restrains judges power
peers
having to right their judgments down
being well learned in the law
the audience
main features of the rule of law
absolute supremacy or predominance of regular law as opposed to influence of arbitrary power
equality before the law
constitution is not the source but the consequence of rights of individuals as enforced by courts