1/52
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Cities
high pop size
internally structured
serves multiple functions for own people + surrounding area
EX: hamlet—> megacity (10 million people +)
primate city
dominant city within a country
rank size rule
a city’s pop = 1/nth of the largest city’s pop where N = the rank of the city’s pop
2nd largest city (n = 2) = ½ of the largest city’s pop
Urbanized Area (UA)
50k+ people, disregards city, county, or state boundaries
Urban Cluster
at least 2.5k people but smaller than urbanized area
Rural Area
not a UA or UC
Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA)
central county + adjacent outlying counties have a high degree of social + economic integration
must contain at least 1 area w/ 50k+ people
central county contains the core
functional def, communting as a key metric
micropolitan Statistical Area
only diff = must contain at least 1 urban cluster w/ 10k-50k people
Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas
adjacent metropolitan + micropolitan statistical areas that’re connected by social + economic ties including commuting patterns
Carter’s Theories of Urban Origins
-agricultural surplus
-religion
-defense
-trading
Largest Urban Areas
-fastest growing cities are in developing cities
-developed countries are most urbanized, but less developing + least developed countries are the fastest urbanizing w/ the fastest growing large cities
System of cities
-relationships btw cities in a system
-urban hierarchy—> ranking of cities based on size + functional complexity
network btw cities
primate city, rank size rule, central place theory
cities as systems
relationships within cities or urban areas
urban form—> size, shape, and configuration of an urban area or its parts
land use model or concentric zone model
Christaller’s Central Place Theory
model of urban hierarchy
goal: explain the patterns of central place settlements + market areas based on economic functions of towns + cities
dist of cities + towns across an area
commodities offered in each town or city play important roles
low order commodity—> groceries or gas
high order commodity—> specialized equip/luxury goods
Model Terminology
Urban Centers
towns/suburbs that provide goods and/or services
thresholds
minimum # of people required to support a service
higher order goods gave a higher threshold
range
max distance a person is willing to travel for a good or service
larger for high order services/ goods
Model Assumptions
isotropic plan
all physical parameters are the same at any point + in any direction
rural pops evenly dispersed across plain
economic rationality
consumers
we all have similar tastes
we all purchase goods at nearest central place
suppliers
complete market coverage
local monopoly
Sum Up Christaller’s Central Place Theory
Urban hierarchy based on commodities + pop
Order of commodities (low to high)
Diff commodities have diff thresholds of market areas → minimum pop needed to support it
Low order commodity = low threshold
High order commodity = high threshold
Diff commodities have diff ranges → distance people are willing to travel for it
Low order commodity = short range
High order commodity = longer range
Model Mechanics
Market area
Hexagon shape
Central place plus hinterlands
Noncompeting market areas
The size of the hexagon is proportional to the # of goods + services demanded + can be afforded
Nested structure: low order commodity service areas are contained within high order areas
Central Place Theory
Towns of the same size will be evenly space
Larger towns will be farther apart than smaller ones
More small towns than larger towns will exist
Land Use Model
internal structure of cities or urban areas
urban form
layout of an urban area
model that shows where functions are found in a city
central business district (CBD)
downtown of a city
Features of Land Use Model
Accessibility
CBD = most accessible location
most acessible = highest demand, highest rent
distance decay
demand for land/rent decreases as we move away from the center
Land Use Model Caveats
suburbanization
commercial + retail functions move to periphery
other factors affecting residential land use
urban disinvestment + decay
gentrification
immigrant enclaves
new housing approaches
Concentric Zone Model
Zone 1
zone of transition
factories, low income slums, high density
Zone 2
zone of workers
smaller older homes
Zone 3
zone of better residences—> longer commute to CBD
houses + apartments
Zone 4
zone of suburbs —> longest commute to CBD
upward mobility
invasion + sucession
as city expand, families w/ the most resources move to outer circles
chances for immigrants + their children to move outward
new immigrants move to the center of the city
Concentric Zone Critiques
only applicable to US
developed pre automobile
developed in 1920s chicago
developed prior to 1925 pre baby boom + rise of suburbs
mobility is much more complicated than invasion + succession
Sector Model
differences in residential sectors by income/rent levels
focused on dallas
sectors
high rent—> areas w/ natural amenities (parks, hills)
low rent—> areas next to industry/manufacturing
middle rent—> in btw high + low rent sectors
sector Model + upward mobility
filtering down
housing filters down the income ladder
high income residents move outward to newer housing, low income residents move into areas they vacate (older housing)
areas of devel near periphery = higher status
Multiple Nuclei Model (devel after car + rise of suburbs)
-CBD doesn’t have to be a monopoly
suburban growth
Peripheral Model (Suburban Model too)
peripheral belt
CBD
no monopolu
optional location
sprawl
Segregation Measures
dissimilarity
eveness w/ which 2 groups are dist across component geographic areas that make up a larger area
range 0 -100 —> 0 is complete integration btw 2 groups, 100 is complete segregation
less than 30—>low
60—> high
(90+)—> very high
exposure
degree of potential contact or interaction btw members of a group/members of a diff group
isolation
exposure but to members of ones own group
Causes of Segregation
spatial assimilation
segregation is due to group diffs in socioeconomic resources
more valid explanation for Asain-white Latinx segregation
not as valid for explaining white-black segregation
place stratification
segregation is due to racism
overt + covert housing discrimination
overt
redlining
refusing to rent/sell to someone based on race
covert
steering from landlords
using factors related to race to deny housing
NIBYISM
preferences
people want to live around people like them
homophily—> tendency for people to seek out or be attracted to those who are similar to themselves
redlining
outlining areas w/ sizeable black pops in red ink on maps as warnings to mortage lenders
Problems w/ segregation
poverty in non white neighborhoods
unequal access to resources
lack of oppurtinities to form intergroup relations
Gentrification
process of renewal or rebuilding, influx of rich people into previously deteriorating areas
demographic inversion
increase movement by middle + high income people, pops out of suburbs + back into city center
Gentrification Patterns
indicators
change in neighboorhood income charcterisics/poverty
change in neighboorhood racial/ethnic groups
change in housing stock or density
What causes Gentrification
selective renewal in older neighborhoods
gentrifying pioneers
creatives
changing tastes of homebuers
younger or older retirees
childless
rent gap
land closer to city center = more valuable
neglected areas closer to center have high potential value—> high ROI—> renovate older housing to increase value
Gentrification pros + cons
-pros
investment in city
increasing tax base
renovation of older housing
-cons
displacement of poor non white pop
cultural displacement
less age diversity
Suburbanization
movement from city center to the periphery
idea of CBD isn’t as important
suburb
not a principal city
pop doesn’t exceed 100k people
over half of US pop lives in suburbs
Causes of Suburbanization
changing modes of transportation
post WWII baby boom
increasing edu, wealth, housing loan
cheaper land in suburbs
deterioration of central cities
white flight(whites leaving central city for suburbs)
Problems of Suburbanization
urban decay, detoriation of central city
automobile dominance
suburnaization—> urban sprawl—> loss of biodiversity
homogenization of the built envr
Exurbs
distant/isolated suburbs
economic connections to larger urban metro
low density housing
higher pop growth than metro as whole
Suburban Demographics
suburbs in past
white
non immigrant
middle/high income
suburbs now
increasingly non white
increasingly immigrant
increasing poverty
Defining Development
development
extent where humans + natural resources of an area have been brought into full productive use
implies degree of inequality
comparison of development can be made within countries/states/cities not just internationally
assumptions
advanced countries set the standard
less developed countries will eventually evolve into middle _ highly developed countries
Underdevelopment
an area requires add. capital, labor, or tech to improve material well being of pop
terms
transition economy, moderately, middle income countries
Outdated Terms
global N + Soutj
rich north
poor south
1st world
advanced capitalist economies
2nd world
communist bloc countries
3rd world
all others
Current UN terminology
developed vs developing
developed economies, economies in transition, developing economies
measures of development
GDP
total market value of all final goods + services prod annually within the borders of a country
nominal GDP
total income of everyone in the country
total expenditure on output of goods + services
Real gdp
nominal GDP adjusted for inflation
GDP per capita
nominal or real GDP divided by pop size
GNI
GDP plus total foriegn income earned by citizens
adjustments made to compare values across countries
convert currency into 1 measure (US $)
divide by # of people in the country (per capita)
make purchasing power parity correction
PPP
correction applied to GNI, accounts for price diffs across countries
Problems w/ GNI indicator
only measures flows
increased flows may not equal increased well being
includes spending on military
doesn’t measure condition of natural envr
doesn’t measure income dist/inequality
GINI measures economic inequality
0 = total equality
1 = total inequality
doesn’t measure informal economy
Energy Consumption Per Capita
more developed countries use more E
but prod of E = more common in less developed countries
cheap E
use of fossil fuels
capital investment = low cost per unit
Workforce Engaged in Agriculture
subsistence agriculture
developing countries
Measurement of Development
food security
provision of sufficient quantiies of safe + nutrious food
dietary balance
can meet caloric requirements for moderate activity
negative effects of food insecutiy
infant + child mortality
physical + cog devel
stunting
shorter stature due to lack of food
Housing
informal settlements
unauthorized housing
slum
informal settlement that’s densly populated
inadequate access to safe drinking water, sanitation, poor structural quality of housing, overcrowding, insecure residential status
Health
access to medical facilities
access to doctors
access to medical + public health tech
antibiotics
immunizations
clean water + sanitation
Explanations for Underdevelopment: Physical Geography
physical geography
tropic v temperate climate zones
tropic areas
low agricultural prod
challening soil
higher incidence of disease
resource poverty
deficiency in raw materials
probs w/ exporting raw materials
landlocked countries
reduced acess to markets
increased cost of transporting goods
Critiques
weak set of explanations
for every ex, a countered
many developed countries have overcame physical geography
Explanations for Underdevelopment: Slave Trade + colonialism
almost all countries in global south were colonies of EU countries
slave trade forced migration
legacy of slave trade + colonization
expolitation of resources
export oreitned economies, dependence on other countries
est of boundaries w/ no regard to ethnic groups
weak political, gov institutions
corruption/conflict
critiques
some former colonies devel w/o problems
Explanations for Underdevelopment: Modernization T
countries are in diff stages of economic growth
w countries are blueprint for developing countries
all societies pass through 6 stages of devel
all will eventually reach end stages of mass consumptiom + post indust
more developed countries should aid less developed countries
optimistic
6 stages
traditional society
farming
preconditions for take off
take off
begining of industrilization
drive to maturity
int trade + advd tech
age of mass consumption
info heavy + service jobs, pop consumes well above basic needs
post industrialization
critiques
assumes devel will happen w/
foriegn assistance
tech transfer diffusion from adv economies
infrastructure advancements
not all countries start at the same baseline
assumes developed countries should be the standard
dependence on developed countries for help
Explanations for Underdevelopment: Core Periphery Development + Dependence T
uneven spatial devel
core benefits at expense of periphery
resources, money, people flow out of periphery and into core
pessimistic outlook
one region begins to develop ahead of another
core becomes more attractive than peripheral
multipler effect w/ investment
permanent division btw the core + periphery
Dependency T
extension of Core-periphery T
development of some nations have depended on underdevelopment of others
dependency began w/ colonialism, conts today
Critiques
they don’t explain the growth of semi-periphery countries
developing countries = passive victims
negates diffs among developing countries
world economic resources not fixed
Strategies for development
Strategies influenced by modernization theory
1950s-1970s “The Big Push”
Borrowing money from world bank
Prod increases, expanding trade
Ex: world bank loans for roads, railroads
1980s “washington consensus”
Neoliberal globalization
Goals: development through free markets + privatization
Probs w/ Big Push
Inefficiencies
Corruption
Lack of trust that gov could fulfill development goals
Washington consensus
Neoliberal globalization
Economies grow when govs don’t interfere
Barriers to trade are removed
Free trade
privatization → state run companies
Promote private foreign firms + investments
Small gov
Reduce taxes, reduce spending
Neoliberal Globalization Problems
Didn’t lead to overall development in many places
Major debts to world bank
IMF refinanced debt→ but w/ strings attached
Private land ownership conc in hands of few wealthy individs in developing countries
Urban squatters
Rural landless
Land given to large scale agriculture instead of small farmers
Malnutrition, disease