Argumenta for the Existence of God

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/13

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 9:12 AM on 8/4/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

14 Terms

1
New cards

Who came up with the ontological argument

St Anselm of Canterbury

2
New cards

How many forms of the ontological argument are there?

2

3
New cards

What is the first form of the ontological argument?

  • God is known as “then that which no greater being can be conceived”

  • Deductive, a priori

  • We can understand God in the mind

  • Existence is greater in reality then in the mind

  • If God only existed in the mind a greater being could be conceived

  • Therefore God must exist in reality

4
New cards

What is the second form argument of the ontological argument for?

A response to Gaunilo and the Perfect Island analogy

5
New cards

What is the Perfect Island analogy?

  • Gaunilo

  • We can use the definition given by Anselm on anything such as a perfect island, if we can imagine it in the mind it must exist in reality otherwise a more perfect island would be able to exist

6
New cards

Second form of the ontological argument

  • The perfect island analogy doesn’t work as he uses the argument of a necessary v contingent being, the island is an example of a contingent being the same as everything else apart from God, the necessary being

7
New cards

Summary of Copleston and Russell’s argument (response to the cosmological argument)

Copelston- everything in the universe is a contingent being, there must be an uptime reason for existence and God is the logically necessary being that sustains everything

Russell- The universe exists as a brute fact, the cause reasoning applies to something in the universe not the universe itself, fallacy of composition

8
New cards

Cosmological argument

  • Thomas Aquinas

  • Inductive, a posteriori

  • Five ways (1-3)

  • 1. Motion (change)

  • 2. Causation (causes)

  • 3. Contingency

  • God is the efficient cause

  • Contingent v necessary beings

9
New cards

Teleological argument

  • design argument

  • William Paley

  • Rock and watch analogy

  • Purpose, order, design, intricacy

  • Inductive, a posteriori

10
New cards

Kant - criticism of ontological argument

Existence is not a predicate, god in reality doesn’t add any greatness just because he exists

11
New cards

Evaluation of the teleological argument

  • Spatial disorder (natural disasters, empty places, biological flaws)

  • Inductive leap (watchmaker → God)

  • Why does it have to be the God of classical theism?

  • Comparing the world to a machine

  • Fallacy of composition (causes in the universe doesn’t equal a single cause of the universe)

12
New cards

What are Humes 6 criticisms of the teleological egument

  • organic origin (we should let the world evolve a it has done)

  • Compares the world to a machine

  • Flawed creator due to the evil in our world

  • We as humans don’t have the knowledge or capability to judge how the earth was createsn

13
New cards

Evaluation of the cosmological argument

  • Russell and Copleston

  • Fallacy of composition (1 cause doesn’t equal God)

  • Infinite regress

  • Even if there is a first cause it doesn’t mean it was the Christian God

14
New cards

Evaluation of the ontological

  • Kant

  • Perfect island analogy