Obedience Soc 7

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/10

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

These flashcards cover key concepts and findings related to obedience as discussed in the lecture, including Milgram's study, factors reducing obedience, and the Stanford prison experiment.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

11 Terms

1
New cards

Obedience

Following the orders of a person in authority, typically involving a lower status individual complying with the wishes of someone of higher status.

2
New cards

Milgram’s Study (1963)

An experiment investigating obedience where participants were instructed to administer electric shocks to a learner for incorrect answers.

3
New cards

Maximum Voltage in Milgram's Experiment

65% of participants administered the maximum shock of 450 volts.

4
New cards

Factors that Reduce Obedience

Factors include victim proximity, authority proximity, legitimacy of authority figure, and presence of dissenters.

5
New cards

Victim Proximity

Lower obedience when the learner is physically present; even lower when the teacher must physically place the learner's hand on the shock plate.

6
New cards

Legitimacy of Authority

Obedience is more likely in a recognized institution (Yale laboratory) than in a less legitimate setting (downtown office).

7
New cards

Role Adoption

The duty determined by one's position in a hierarchy, leading to behavior changes based on expected group norms.

8
New cards

Stanford Prison Experiment

A study where participants were assigned roles of 'prisoner' or 'guard' to explore the psychological effects of perceived power.

9
New cards

Gradual Commitment

The principle where small initial requests lead to compliance with larger requests later, also known as the 'Foot-in-the-door' technique.

10
New cards

Zimbardo’s Conclusions

Situational factors rather than dispositional factors drive behavior, as shown by how participants adapt to roles in the Stanford Prison Experiment.

11
New cards

Criticism of Zimbardo’s Conclusions

Participants were merely role-playing based on stereotypes, leading to evidence that behavior can vary significantly across similar situations.