3.4 - permanent income hypothesis (aggregate demand)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/6

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

milton friedman, 1957

Last updated 2:35 PM on 9/19/25
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

7 Terms

1
New cards

consumers don’t make decisions based on just _____ ______

current income

2
New cards

households vary consumption patterns due to:

  • permanent/normal income (stable incomes over 5-10 years leads to more consumption/savings)

3
New cards

consumption doesn’t change if consumers percieve income changes to be __________

transitory (variable/changing) e.g. a bonus

4
New cards

why is is the permanent income hypothesis plausible?

  • it would be irrational to consume based on short-term income changes

  • it would result in a high trade off (decreased future utility)

5
New cards

permanent income hypothesis limits: high vs low income

  • HI: already have wealth, income changes aren’t spent

  • LI: more likely to spend income increases, as they’re under more pressure

6
New cards

permanent income hypothesis limits: unexpected increase windfall

  • e.g. winning lottery, bonus

  • more likely to instantly increase spending (party! 🥳)

7
New cards

permanent income hypothesis limits: subjectivity

  • some think any income change is permanent/transitory

  • depends on the person!