Social Influence Part 2

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 49

50 Terms

1

Cohen et al. date

1981

New cards
2

Cohen et al. aim

To study how existing schema affects the way we process and remember details

New cards
3

Cohen et al. IV

Occupation of woman: Waitress or librarian

New cards
4

Cohen et al. procedure

2 groups of participants watched a video of a woman celebrating her birthday with her husband (video contains equal amount of stereotypical details)

New cards
5

Cohen et al. results

Participants were more likely to remember schema-consistent information based on the profession they were told the woman had

New cards
6

What did participants tend to remember about the waitress? (Cohen et al.)

She ate a burger, drank beer, listened to pop music

New cards
7

What did participants tend to remember about the Librarian? (Cohen et al.)

She reads books and drank wine

New cards
8

Stone et al. date

2012

New cards
9

Stone et al. aim

To study the effect of existing stereotypes (in American culture about athletes) on memory processing

New cards
10

Stone et al. procedure

Participants listened to the recording of a basketball game and then asked to judge the athlete's performance

New cards
11

Stone et al. IV

Race of the athlete (White/black)

New cards
12

Stone et al. results

Black: More athletic and played a better game

White: Basketball intelligence/strategy and hustle

New cards
13

Bransford and Johnson date

1972

New cards
14

Bransford and Johnson aim

To study the effect of schema activation on information comprehension and recall

New cards
15

Bransford and Johnson conditions

Title before, Title after, No title

New cards
16

Bransford and Johnson procedure

Participants read an ambiguous passage of text (actually about doing laundry) Rated their own comprehension and recall as much details as possible

New cards
17

Bransford and Johnson results

Averages amount of details recalled:

Title before: 5.8 details

Title after: 2.6 details

No title: 2.8 details

New cards
18

Rationalization

To adapt or omit information to make it more consistent with existing schema

New cards
19

Bartlett date

1932

New cards
20

Bartlett aim

To study how memory recall is affected by existing schema

New cards
21

Bartlett procedure

British participants Told a Native American folk tale "War of the ghosts" (used because it had many elements that are uncommon in English storytelling)

New cards
22

Bartlett results

The story got shorter, and the participants changed parts of the story (e.g. supernatural elements disappeared)

New cards
23

Misinformation effect

Having incorrect information become part of someone's memory of an event

New cards
24

Confabulation

Remembering a false memory/something that never actually happened

New cards
25

Loftus and Palmer date

1974

New cards
26

Loftus and Palmer aim

To study reconstructive memory through leading questions

New cards
27

Loftus and Palmer procedure

Participants watched clips of car accidents then answered questions about what they saw

Critical question: How fast were the cars going when they _______ each other?

New cards
28

What were the 5 verbs used in Loftus and Palmer

Smashed, hit, bumped, contacted, collided

New cards
29

Loftus and Palmer results (1)

smashed = fastest speed estimates, contacted = slowest speed estimates

New cards
30

Loftus and Palmer 2nd experiment

Added question: Did you see broken glass?

New cards
31

Loftus and Palmer results (2)

32% of smashed condition saw broken glass, control 12%

New cards
32

The bystander effect

Not helping in a situation that requires action

New cards
33

Informational social influence

When an individual's behavior changes because they look to other people for guidance on the "right" way to behave

New cards
34

Darley and Latane date

1968

New cards
35

Darley and Latane aim

To study the effect of informational social influence on the bystander effect

New cards
36

Darley and Latane procedure

  • Control group: Alone in the room

  • Experiment group: Participants filled out a questionnaire in a room with confederates

  • Room started filling with smoke, confederates instructed not to react

New cards
37

Darley and Latane results

Control: 75% of participants went to look for help within 6 minutes Experiment: Only 10% sought help within 6 minutes

New cards
38

Diffusion of responsibility

An individual's feeling of obligation to act is reduced from being in a group

New cards
39

Levine et al. date

2001

New cards
40

Prosocial behavior

Acting in a way that benefits others

New cards
41

Levine et al. aim

To study the effect of economic productivity and cultural values on prosocial behavior

New cards
42

Levine et al. procedure

  • Confederates pretend to need help (e.g. dropping an item, pretending to be a blind/injured person)

  • Measured economic productivity through GDP

  • Measured relative individualism/collectivism

New cards
43

Levine et al. results

Strong negative correlation between economic productivity and helping behavior

Weak correlation between collectivism and less helping behavior

New cards
44

Altruism

To do something for others without expecting self-benefit

New cards
45

Empathy-altruism hypothesis

When you experience empathy for someone else, you are more likely to act altruistically and help them

New cards
46

Batson et al. date

1981

New cards
47

Batson et al. aim

To investigate the empathy-altruism hypothesis

New cards
48

Batson et al. Procedure

  • Participant + confederate "Elaine" Filled out questionnaire

  • Either told they were similar or different -> high/low empathy

  • Elaine as worker, participant as observer

  • Told that Elaine would receive electric shocks

  • Participant can choose to replace Elaine or not

New cards
49

Batson et al. conditions

  • High empathy/ease of escape

  • Low empathy/ease of escape

  • High empathy/difficult escape

  • Low empathy/difficult escape

New cards
50

Batson et al. results

Percentage that chose to replace Elaine:

  • High empathy/ease of escape (91%)

  • Low empathy/ease of escape (18%)

  • High empathy/difficult escape (82%)

  • Low empathy/difficult escape (62%)

New cards
robot