1/22
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Internal
why people do what they do. within the person not caused outside.
Ex: Roommate leaving dirty dishes bc they were running late
Casual
▫ they explain behavior of the people who cause those traits
▫ Can be dormant: Expression behavior that. Not always an opportunity to expression but doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist
▫ If view traits as causal must rule out other causes
Descriptive Summaries
We are labeling behaviors. Descriptive summaries only
▫ Identity individual differences and then develop causal theories to explain them
▫ Acknowledges the variety of potential causes of behavior
Approaches to identifying Traits
Lexical, Statistical, Theoretical
Lexical Hypothesis
All important individual differences have become encoded within the natural language over time
Lexical Approach
Synonym Frequency
▫ One the list is created the researchers would looking at those words and they will try to find synonym for those words. Words more important have more synonyms
-Ex: Finding synonym for Envy (jealousy).
Lexical Approach
Cross Cultural University
We want traits that are more important. Words ending up in a lot of languages. Reoccurring
-Challenges for this technique: Time consuming
-Ex: Gay having more than one meaning
Lexical Approach
Problems and Limitations
• Not finding enough
• Starting point for identifying traits
Statistical Approach
Starts with a large, diverse pool of personality items
-Ex: Identifying word and find those synonyms and characterize it with individuals
Statistical Approach
Goal
Identify major dimensions of personality - statistical technique called factor analysis
Statistical Approach
Use of Factor Analysis
▫Identifies groups of items that covary (go together), but tend not to covary with other groups of items
▫Cautionary note: How each item is correlating to that factor
Theoretical Approach
• Starts with a theory, which then determines which variables are important
• Strengths coincide with strengths of a theory, and weaknesses coincide with the weaknesses of a theory
Evaluating the Approaches for Identifying Important Traits
Taxonomies of Personality
Eysenck’s Hierarchical model of personality
Cattell’s Taxonomy: the 16 personality factor system
Five factor model
Eysenck's Hierarchical Model
Extraversion-interversion (e)
Care free easy going, has energy, higher energy level
Eysenck's Hierarchical Model
Neuroticism-Emotional stability (N)
worriers, more prone to anxiety and depression have trouble sleeping, experience psychosomatic symptoms, tend to over reactivity for negative emotions
Eysenck's Hierarchical Model
Psychoticism (P)
score higher in solitary, lack empathy, cruel, inhuman, unconcerned with pain and suffering of others, more likely to enjoy violent films|| linked to testosterone, higher levels of MAO
Ex: Aggressivness, antisocial, cold, egocentric, impersonal, tough minded
Eysenck's Hierarchical Model'
Biological Underpinnings-limitations
Many other personality traits show moderate heritability
Eysenck may have missed important traits
5 Factor Model
Originally based on the combination of lexical and statistical approaches
Openness
Openness to new ideas and experiences
High Openness: Theres a path and ppl with high openness will go there (could look spontaneous)
Conscientiousness
Being organized, detailed oriented, systematic, punctual, achievement oriented, and dependable
Extraversion
Outgoing, talkative, sociable in situations
Agreeableness
Trusting, kind, warm. High =Cooperative behavior
Neuroticism
High= high emotional instability. They experience a lot of stress and get upset easily, many others struggle after a traumatic effect
Ex: Anxious, Irrational, Depressed, guilt, moody, low self-esteem, emotional, tense