Send a link to your students to track their progress
56 Terms
1
New cards
bill of rights
name the first ten amendments
2
New cards
civil rights
rights provided by the government against discrimination for being part of a certain group
3
New cards
civil liberties
rights meant to protect people against mistreatment by the government
4
New cards
selective incorporation
a federal doctrine that uses the fourteenth amendment to apply constitutional provisions to state and local governments
5
New cards
dc v. heller
court ruled that dc's ban on handguns violated heller's 2nd amendment rights
6
New cards
mcdonald v. chicago
court held that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms" protected by the 2nd amendment is incorporated by the due process clause of the 14th amendment and applies to the states. decision cleared up the uncertainty left after dc v. heller & the scope of gun rights concerning the states
7
New cards
lemon v. kurtzman / lemon test
test for determining the constitutionality of government programs and laws under the establishment clause: must have a legit legislative purpose (not inherently religious), primary effect must not be to advance or inhibit religion, must not endorse a single religion
8
New cards
free exercise clause
a first amendment provision that prohibits the government from interfering with the exercise of religion/religious practices
9
New cards
establishment clause
a first amendment provision that prohibits the government from establishing/endorsing an official religion
10
New cards
engel v. vitale
school-sponsored prayer violates the establishment clause of the 1st amendment, government cannot endorse a single religion
11
New cards
wisconsin v. yoder
state's requirement that parents send their children to school until age 16 violates the free exercise clause of the 1st amendment, as it interferes with the religious beliefs of the amish
12
New cards
pure speech
the verbal expression of thought and opinion before an audience that has chosen to listen
13
New cards
slander
speed that isn't true and can harm someone's reputation
14
New cards
libel
a published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; a written defamation
15
New cards
fighting words
profanity, obscenity, and threats
16
New cards
obscene speech
lewd, filthy, or disgusting words/pictures
17
New cards
symbolic speech
conveying an idea or message through behavior
18
New cards
time, place, and manner restrictions
government regulations that place restrictions on free speech (specifying when/where/in what way speech is allowed), applied when unrestricted free speech will conflict with the rights of others
19
New cards
prior restraint
government censorship of information before it is published or broadcasted
20
New cards
schenk v. us
schenk's conviction under the espionage act because of his criticism of the draft didn't violate the his 1st amendment rights; created the precedent that free speech is not protected if it presents a clear and present danger
21
New cards
new york times v. us
prior restraint (preventing the publication of the paper) is unjustified unless it will inevitably and directly put american troops in danger
22
New cards
tinker v. des moines
courts ruled that students do not lose their constitutional rights when they enter the school but their rights can be limited if they disrupt the learning environment
23
New cards
brandenburg v. ohio
the 1st amendment right to assembly is protected, even if it is from a hate group. gov can't punish or prohibit inflammatory speech unless it is likely to incite imminent lawless action
24
New cards
texas v. johnson
flag burning is protected by the 1st amendment
25
New cards
search warrant
a court order allowing law enforcement officers to search a suspect's home or business and take specific items as evidence, requires probable cause to obtain one
26
New cards
probable cause
reasonable grounds for issuing a search warrant or making an arrest; more than reasonable suspicion but less than proof beyond moral certainty
27
New cards
reasonable suspicion
any information that points to illegal activity
28
New cards
mapp v. ohio
established the exclusionary rule (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
29
New cards
what are exceptions to getting a search warrant?
"wingspan" rule (excluding phone), quick pat down of suspect w/ reasonable suspicion, consent from suspect, plain sight, vehicle searches, protective sweep search, border/airport searches
30
New cards
new jersey v. tlo
court held that while the 4th amendment still prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures for public school officials, they can conduct reasonable warrantless searches of students without the probable cause that would normally be required for searches under the 4th
31
New cards
gideon v. wainwright
the 6th amendment right to a lawyer in criminal cases extends from federal to state cases as well. used the 14th amendment to incorporate because it is considered a fundamental right.
32
New cards
miranda v. arizona
the 5th amendment requires that law enforcement officials advise suspects of their right to remain silent and right to an attorney ONLY when they are being interrogated while in police custody
33
New cards
eminent domain
the right of a government seize private property for public use, with payment of compensation
34
New cards
double jeopardy
being tried twice for the same crime, prevented by the fifth amendment
35
New cards
self incrimination
when an individual accused of a crime is compelled to be a testify against himself or herself in court, prevented by the fifth amendment
36
New cards
roe v. wade
the due process clause of the 14th amendment protects an individual's right to privacy and therefore a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by abortion
37
New cards
dobbs v. jackson women's health organization
overturned roe v. wade; ruled that the constitution didn't mention abortion and the right is neither deeply rooted in the nation's history nor an necessity of "ordered liberty."
38
New cards
rational basis
the lowest level of scrutiny applied by courts deciding constitutional issues through judicial review, determines if a policy uses reasonable means to achieve a legitimate government goal
39
New cards
intermediate scrutiny
the intermediate standard used by the courts to decide cases of discrimination based on gender and sex; law must advance "an important government objective" and be "substantially related" to the objective
40
New cards
strict scrutiny
the highest supreme court test to see if a law denies equal protection to minorities; determines if the law serves a compelling state interest and is narrowly tailored to achieve that goal (restricts individual rights the least)
41
New cards
equal protection clause
fourteenth amendment clause that prohibits states from denying equal protection to every citizen, has been used to combat discrimination
42
New cards
plessy v. ferguson (1896)
a test case organized by african americans in new orleans to challenge louisiana's jim crow laws. homer plessy (7/8 caucasian) tried to sit in an all white railroad car and was arrested as an african american. supreme court ruled that louisiana's laws were constitutional under the 14th amendment because "social prejudices can't be overcome by legislation." established the doctrine "separate but equal."
43
New cards
de facto segregation
segregation by unwritten custom or tradition
44
New cards
de jure segregation
segregation by law
45
New cards
civil rights act
(1964) gave citizenship to african americans, banned discrimination in public acomodations/federal programs/most places of employment/schools, enlarged federal powers to protect voting rights
46
New cards
voting rights act
(1965) banned literary/knowledge tests at polling places and allowed the federal government to oversee voter registration
47
New cards
letter from birmingham jail
a letter written by martin luther king jr after he had been arrested when he took part in a nonviolent march against segregation, saying that they could not wait any longer and encouraging non-violent protesting
48
New cards
brown v. board of education (1954)
oliver brown tried to enroll his daughter linda in a closer and less dangerous all white school. he was denied and sued. the supreme court overruled plessy v. ferguson and declared that racially segregated facilities are inherently unequal. ordered all public schools desegregated.
49
New cards
title ix
one of the amendments to the education act (1972), prohibiting sex discrimination in schools receiving financial aid. increased female participation in sports.
50
New cards
equal rights amendment
constitutional amendment passed by congress but never ratified that would have banned gender discrimination
51
New cards
ada
americans with disabilities act (ada) (1990) protects those with physical/mental impairments against discrimination in the workplace and improved access to public services; unfunded mandate
52
New cards
obergefell v. hodges
court ruled that because there are no differences between a same-sex union and an opposite-sex union, banning gay marriage violates the 14th's due process & equal protection clauses. the banning of same-sex couples' marriage would deny them equal protection under the law.
53
New cards
affirmative action
policies designed to redress past discrimination against women and minority groups through special measures to improve their economic and educational opportunities
54
New cards
regents v. bakke (1978)
allan blakke was rejected from a university, but argued his academic record was superior to a group of minorities the university accepted. the court agreed that the quota system violated his 14th amendment rights under the equal protection clause, but also affirmed the legitimacy of the goal of increasing minority stunned enrollment (left opportunities for affirmative action without strict quotas)
55
New cards
gratz v. bollinger / grutter v. bollinger (2003)
case that attempted to define the limits of allowed affirmative action. jennifer gratz had been rejected from a university that used a points system. some points were granted to underrepresented ethnicities. the court ruled that using the points system was unconstitutional but didn't strike down the use of race/ethnicity as one of the many factors in admissions. later in grutter, the court affirmed the use constitutional use of race as a factor as long as the school could prove it had a compelling interest to do so (ensuring a diverse student body was a compelling reason)
56
New cards
idea
individuals with disabilities education act (1990) requires that a free appropriate public education be provided to all students, regardless of their disabilities