Lecture 3: Disorders of Chromosome Copy Number Variation (CNV)

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/46

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 7:20 PM on 9/25/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

47 Terms

1
New cards

Objectives

knowt flashcard image
2
New cards

What are the 2 major types of genetic variations in human disease?

  1. Quantitative

  2. Qualitative


Other


<ol><li><p>Quantitative</p></li><li><p>Qualitative</p></li></ol><p></p><p>Other</p><p></p>
3
New cards

****What types of Genetic variations fall under the Quantitative vs. Qualitative categories? Other category?

  1. Quantitative: Aneuploidy, Del/Dup (too much/ too little genetic material)

  2. Qualitative: Sequence variants


Other: Balanced structural (Inversion + translocations), Epigenetic (methylations + imprinting)

<ol><li><p>Quantitative: <strong>Aneuploidy</strong>, <strong>Del/Dup</strong> (too much/ too little genetic material)</p></li><li><p>Qualitative: <strong>Sequence variants</strong></p></li></ol><p></p><p>Other: <strong>Balanced </strong>structural (Inversion + translocations), <strong>Epigenetic </strong>(methylations + imprinting)</p>
4
New cards

*****Quantitative vs. Qualitative genetic variants Which are CHROMOSOMAL disorders + Which are SINGLE GENE disorders?

Quantitative = CHROMOSOMAL

Qualitative = SINGLE GENE

5
New cards

******What type of TESTING Cytogenetic vs. Molecular would you use for QUANTITATIVE vs. QUALITATIVE diseases?

  • List the names of the different tests in each category


  1. Quantitative = CYTOGENETIC → Karyotype, ACGH/Microarray, FISH

  2. Qualitative = MOLECULAR → sequence technologies


<ol><li><p>Quantitative = CYTOGENETIC → <strong>Karyotype, ACGH/Microarray, FISH</strong></p></li><li><p>Qualitative = MOLECULAR → sequence technologies</p></li></ol><p></p>
6
New cards

Since this is the chromosomal unit we’ll be focusing on the CHROMOSOMAL diseases

knowt flashcard image
7
New cards

****Compare the RESOLUTION + DIAGNOSIS YIELD between Karyotype + Microarray (comparative genomic hybridization)

Karyotype = LOW resolution + LOW diagnostic yield

Microarray = HIGH resolution + HIGH diagnostic yield

  • Diagnostic yield: percentage of tests that successfully find a definitive disease-causing genetic change


<p><strong>Karyotype </strong>= LOW resolution + LOW diagnostic yield</p><p><strong>Microarray</strong> = HIGH resolution + HIGH diagnostic yield</p><ul><li><p>Diagnostic yield: percentage of  tests that successfully find a definitive disease-causing genetic change</p></li></ul><p></p>
8
New cards

*****What are the 4 types of chromosomal CNVs? DEFINE each

  1. Aneuploidy: Chr. number that deviates from the multiple of the haploid set (eg. Extra/missing Full chromosome)

  2. Polyploidy: More than complete sets of chromosomes

  3. Del/Dup: loss/gain of a segment of chromosome

  4. Microdel/microdup: Loss/gain of a segment of chromosome LESS THAN 5Mb too small to be detected by conventional cytogenetic methods or high resolution karyotyping


9
New cards

What is the most common polyploidy?

Triploidy

  • not viable


10
New cards

****What 2 things does the Effects of a del/dip depend on?

The SIZE + GENE content

  • Some del/dup are RECURRENT others are UNIQUE to an indiv/family


11
New cards

***Is DEL or DUP better tolerated?

DUP

  • missing info = generally worse than extra info


12
New cards

*****What 4 conditions ALL fall under 22q11.2 DELETION SYNDROME?

  1. DiGeorge’s: Hypoparathyroidism + Immune deficiency

  2. Shprintzen - velo-pharyngeal insufficiency, submucous cleft palate, speech delay

  3. Velocardiofacial

  4. Cayler: Asymmetric crying face


<ol><li><p>DiGeorge’s: Hypoparathyroidism + Immune deficiency</p></li><li><p>Shprintzen - velo-pharyngeal insufficiency, submucous cleft palate, speech delay</p></li><li><p>Velocardiofacial </p></li><li><p>Cayler: Asymmetric crying face</p></li></ol><p></p>
13
New cards

*****What are 7 Symptoms/Clinical indications of 22q11.2 Deletion syndrome

  • List the PERCENTAGE OCCURENCE for the top 4


  1. Learning disability 100%

  2. Immune deficiency 77%

  3. Congenital heart disease (conotruncal malformations) 74%

  4. Palate abnormalities 69%

  5. Hypocalcemia

  6. Hypoparathyroidism

  7. Characteristic Facial features


14
New cards
term image
knowt flashcard image
15
New cards

******What is the LIMITATION of common FISH probes on detecting 22q11.2 Deletions?

Common FISH probes cannot differentiate between the Typical 3Mb deletion and the smaller nested 1.5 Mb deletion

MICROARRAYs will let us know if it is a nested deletion


  • Genes ABC (on left) are more commonly deleted genes


16
New cards

******Why do RECURRENT breakpoints occur? Give an example of a mechanism + how it works

  • Remember Del/Dup can be RECURRENT or UNIQUE


Non-allelic Homologous Recombination (NAHR)


Occurs when DNA segments with similar sequences misalign during MEIOSIS

= Unequal Crossing-over ==> recurrent del/dups


  • RESULTS IN RECIPRODAL DEL + DUP


<p><strong><em><u>Non-allelic Homologous Recombination (NAHR)</u></em></strong></p><p></p><p>Occurs when DNA segments with <strong><em><u>similar sequences misalign</u></em></strong> during MEIOSIS</p><p>= <strong><em><u>Unequal Crossing-over </u></em></strong>==&gt; recurrent del/dups</p><p></p><ul><li><p><strong><em><u>RESULTS IN RECIPRODAL DEL + DUP</u></em></strong></p></li></ul><p></p>
17
New cards

****We mentioned how Dup/Del can be recurrent or Unique. Is 22q11.2 Del/Dup UNIQUE or RECURRENT?

Its RECURRENT

  • 22q11.2 Region is a classic hot spot where NAHR between low copy repeats gives rise to common CNV associated with human disease


18
New cards
term image
19
New cards

*****Compare the 22q11.2 DUPLICATION to the reciprocal DELETION

  • How are they different?


The duplication has less medical issues than the deletion

  • Remember Addition info is better than missing info


They have a Non-specific Neurodevelopmental phenotype


20
New cards

*****What is a SYNDROME?

Recognizable pattern of differences in conditions = a syndrome


Many recurrent microdeletions have Specific Clinical features that might be clues to the diagnosis ==> MICRODELETION SYNDROMES

21
New cards

****Microdeletion syndromes account for what % of individuals with Intellectual disabilities

5-7%

22
New cards

(don’t think important) What are some examples of Microdeletion Syndromes?

knowt flashcard image
23
New cards

*****What is Subtelomeric FISH?

  • When was it made

  • Why was it made?

    • Hypothesis?


late 90 - early 2000 (pre microarray)

Why?

  • Many patients with syndromic presentations but Normal karyotypes


Hypothesis:

  • Sub telomeric regions are GENE-RICH and prone to REARRANGEMENTS. Disease-causing tiny Del/Dup near Chromosome ends (subtelomeres) may be missed by G-banded karyotype (RESOLUTION TOO LOW)


Approach:

  • Sub telomeric FISH probes sets → specifically light up ends of each chromosome = if Subtelomere region is del/dup can be detected


24
New cards

*****Example of Utilization of Subtelomeric FISH

  • What is the application of use for this technique (aka when/why would someone choose to use Subtelomeric fish)


Intellectual disability paired with dysmorphic features with UNKNOWN CAUSE

<p>Intellectual disability paired with dysmorphic features with UNKNOWN CAUSE</p>
25
New cards

*****What is an example of a SYNDROME caused by Subtelomeric Deletion

9q34del or Kleefstra syndrome

<p>9q34del or Kleefstra syndrome</p>
26
New cards

*****What are some Physical + Behavioral/Developmental symptoms of 9q34del or Kleefstra syndrome?

Physical:

  • Heart defects

  • Genital defects in males

  • Childhood Hypotonia

  • Respiratory infections

  • Motor delays

  • Renal defects


Behavioral/Developmental

  • Autism

  • Intellectual disability

  • Passiveness

  • Sociability

  • Aggression

  • Disliking routine changes


27
New cards

**History of the Kleefstra syndrome (9q34 del)

Initially children with these features had been described clinically but not recognized as a unified syndrome


Early 2000 - Sub telomeric FISH revealed deletions at 9q34 in some of these patients


Mid 2000 - EHMT1 gene (within 9q34 region) pathogenic sequence variants (point mutations) also determined to be associated with the disorder


Understanding of the causes has helped define the Syndrome, identify new patients and delineate the phenotypic spectrum

Example of RECURRENT CHROMOSOMAL DELETION where one gene may be responsible for the majority of the phenotype

  • Others are unique conditions resulting from contribution of many genes encompassed


28
New cards

*****what is the TEST done to detect CNVs? (genomic Micro del/dups)

Chromosomal Microarray CMA

<p>Chromosomal Microarray CMA</p>
29
New cards

*****Compare + Contrast between KARYOTYPE + Microarray

  • Resolution

  • What type of info does it provide

  • What is it best at detecting

  • USE?


Karyotype USE: Suspected aneuploidy, FHx (family health history) of balanced translocations → better for things like Down syndrome


Array USE: possible MICRODELETION syndrome, Broad differential diagnosis → suspect a genetic variation but don’t know what that may be

<p>Karyotype USE: Suspected <strong>aneuploidy, FHx</strong> (family health history)<strong> of balanced translocations → better for things like Down syndrome</strong></p><p></p><p>Array USE: <strong>possible MICRODELETION syndrome, Broad differential diagnosis → suspect a genetic variation but don’t know what that may be</strong></p>
30
New cards

*****How do Karyotypes + Microarrays compare when it comes to detecting Mosaicism?

Karyotype = May be Better for detection if enough cells are assessed


Array = Not always reliable for LOW LEVEL mosaicism

31
New cards
term image
32
New cards

******what phenotype is commonly associated with microdeletions and duplications and calls for microarray testing

  • What information can Microarray testing on these individuals additionally reveal?


Intellectual disability and developmental delay

  • In some cases identification of a CNV in an individual may shed light on some OTHRE RISKS which may inform surveillance/management


<p>Intellectual disability and developmental delay</p><ul><li><p>In some cases identification of a CNV in an individual may shed light on some OTHRE RISKS which may inform surveillance/management</p></li></ul><p></p>
33
New cards

*****Are CNVs Common in the population?

YES

  • some may have no clinical effect (not all genes/regions are dose sensitive)


34
New cards

****CNV at the population level:

  • CNV >500Kb are seen in what % of individuals

  • CNV >1Mb are seen in what % of individuals?


500kb+ → 5-10%

1 Mb+ → 1-2%

35
New cards
<p>*****HOW ARE COPY NUMBER VARIANTS INTERPRETED?</p>

*****HOW ARE COPY NUMBER VARIANTS INTERPRETED?

knowt flashcard image
36
New cards

*****What are the 5 factors that INCREASE the likelihood of PATHOGENICITY (with caveats)


<p></p>
37
New cards
<p>CASE STUDY: <strong><em><u>What is the LESSON?</u></em></strong></p>

CASE STUDY: What is the LESSON?

Normal array does not exclude a single gene disorder

  • What a microarray does: It looks for large structural changes across the entire genome. It detects missing pieces (deletions) or extra pieces (duplications) of DNA. These are called Copy Number Variants (CNVs) and usually involve hundreds or thousands of DNA base pairs, often spanning multiple genes.

  • What a single-gene disorder is: These conditions are caused by a tiny mistake inside one specific gene—often a change in just a single DNA "letter" (a point mutation) or a tiny deletion/insertion. Examples include Cystic Fibrosis, Sickle Cell Anemia, and Marfan Syndrome.


38
New cards
<p>CASE STUDY: Change in Variant Classification <strong><em><u>What is the LESSON?</u></em></strong></p><ul><li><p>Initially seen as 2-week-old male with low tone, feeding issues, bilateral club feet, laryngomalacia (floppy larynx)</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>No significant prenatal or family history</p></li><li><p>Microarray – small deletion (173kb) encompassing exon 1 of USP7, classified as <strong><em><u>variant of uncertain significance</u></em></strong></p></li></ul><p></p>

CASE STUDY: Change in Variant Classification What is the LESSON?

  • Initially seen as 2-week-old male with low tone, feeding issues, bilateral club feet, laryngomalacia (floppy larynx)

  • No significant prenatal or family history

  • Microarray – small deletion (173kb) encompassing exon 1 of USP7, classified as variant of uncertain significance


Even very small deletions can still be Clinically relevant, depending on gene content. SEGREGATION (testing of family members) can halp interpretation

39
New cards

****Chromosomal disorders in the Prenatal setting

  • Screening vs. Diagnosis

  • What is the use for both

  • Why are they important?


knowt flashcard image
40
New cards

*****is an FTS? What are the 3 components of this process + does this process do?

A FIRST TRIMESTER SCREEN

  • Algorithm provides RISK for TRISOMY 21, 13 + 18


<p>A FIRST TRIMESTER SCREEN </p><ul><li><p><strong><em><u>Algorithm provides RISK for TRISOMY 21, 13 + 18</u></em></strong></p></li></ul><p></p>
41
New cards

*****What is NIPS?

Simple blood test performed during pregnancy to assess the risk of certain genetic conditions

  • Cell-Free DNA: During pregnancy, tiny fragments of DNA from the placenta circulate in the mother's bloodstream. this is what is tested


<p>Simple blood test performed during pregnancy to assess the risk of certain genetic conditions</p><ul><li><p><span><strong>Cell-Free DNA:</strong> During pregnancy, tiny fragments of DNA from the placenta circulate in the mother's bloodstream. this is what is tested</span></p></li></ul><p></p>
42
New cards

What are the steps/flow of events for screen → diagnosis?

knowt flashcard image
43
New cards

****Weigh + Compare the PROS + CONS of Screening vs. Diagnosis Testing

knowt flashcard image
44
New cards

******What are the 4 Important elements to consider for a SCREENING test?

  1. Sensitivity: % of affected pregnancies that are screen +

  2. Positive Predictive value: Likelihood that a person with a + test has an affected pregnancy

  3. Negative Predictive value: Likelihood that a person with a - test does not have an affected pregnancy

  4. Specificity: % of individuals with unaffected pregnancies who screen -


45
New cards

*****Between a FTS + NIPS Which is BETTER for detecting a common aneuploidy?

NIPS has improved SENSITIVITY (detection rate amount of screen positive) + PPV (Positive Predictive Value)

  • NOTE: while NIPS has good Sensitivity + PPV a diagnostic test is still required as it is still a SCREEN


<p>NIPS has improved SENSITIVITY (detection rate amount of screen positive) + PPV (Positive Predictive Value)</p><ul><li><p>NOTE: while NIPS has good Sensitivity + PPV a <strong><em><u>diagnostic test</u></em></strong> is still required as it is still a SCREEN</p></li></ul><p></p>
46
New cards

***Methods of CNV detection by invasive means? How invasive is it?

Diagnostic tests required to confirm or rule out chromosomal disorders after positive screen

Fetal DNA sample acquired via invasive procedures (eg. amniocentesis). Chance of Miscarriage associated (1 in 200 - 1 in 500)

Microarray can also be offered if ultrasounds show anomalies (Even if screen is negative)

47
New cards
<p>*****Of the 5 Microarray results, Which are REPORTED for <strong><em><u>prenatal vs. pediatrics + adult tests?</u></em></strong></p><ul><li><p><strong><em><u>WHY</u></em></strong>?</p></li></ul><p></p>

*****Of the 5 Microarray results, Which are REPORTED for prenatal vs. pediatrics + adult tests?

  • WHY?


Prenatal: Pathogenic + likely pathogenic only

  • Why?

    • As results may inform decisions regarding continuation of a pregnancy thus only actionable results are reported


Pediatrics + adults: VUS added


Remember Likely benign + benign variants are never reported

<p>Prenatal: <strong>Pathogenic + likely pathogenic only</strong></p><ul><li><p>Why? </p><ul><li><p>As results may <strong>inform decisions regarding continuation of a pregnancy</strong> thus only actionable results are reported</p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p>Pediatrics + adults: <strong>VUS added</strong></p><p></p><p>Remember Likely benign + benign variants are never reported</p>