1/52
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
What region does Anderson use as a case study for his theory of maps?
Siam, which is modern-day Thailand.
What is the main focus of Anderson’s excerpt?
How maps transformed the understanding of space and power in 19th-century Asia.
What type of map revolutionized spatial representation in Asia during the 19th century?
The Mercatorian map.
What does Anderson argue maps are not?
Neutral tools of geography.
According to Anderson, what are maps instruments of?
Political power and state authority.
Political power and state authority.
A standardized, geometric, and coordinate-based view of territory.
How were pre-Mercator Siamese maps different from European ones?
They were symbolic and relational, not geometric or scaled.
What kind of precision did the Mercatorian map emphasize?
Borders, coordinates, and proportionate scale.
What did the Mercatorian map allow rulers to imagine for the first time?
A: The nation as a bounded, administratively manageable entity.
Q: Before the Mercator map, how was political space understood in Siam?
A: As a network of relationships, not fixed borders.
Q: What were the two main types of Siamese maps before European influence?
A: Practical/regional maps and cosmological/ritual maps.
Q: What characterized cosmological or ritual maps?
A: They reflected the king’s divine authority and moral order.
Q: What did cosmological maps represent instead of geography?
A: Symbolic relationships and hierarchies.
Q: Were traditional Siamese maps strictly scaled?
A: No, they were flexible and relational.
Q: What did traditional Siamese governance lack that European powers emphasized?
A: Fixed borders.
Q: Who is Thongchai Winichakul?
A: A Thai historian who expanded Anderson’s ideas about mapping and nationhood.
Q: What shift occurred in how maps and power related, according to Thongchai?
A: Maps began shaping power rather than reflecting it.
Q: What did maps start to define in Siam after their introduction?
A: The state’s sovereignty and self-perception.
Q: After Mercatorian maps, what did maps create?
A: New forms of political authority and legitimacy.
Q: Why are historical maps politically powerful?
A: They justify modern national borders as ancient and legitimate.
Q: How do historical maps contribute to nationalism?
A: They make it seem as if the nation has always existed.
Q: What broader theory does the maps this link to?
A: Anderson’s concept of nations as “imagined communities.”
Q: What function does the “map-as-logo” serve?
A: It symbolizes the nation like a brand logo represents a company.