1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
common sense view
technological artifacts are morally inert
strong view
technological artifacts possess moral properties themselves
Langdon Winner
artifacts, being intentionally designed for a specific purpose, thus literally embody the designer’s moral and political values
Objection to Langdon Winner
Social structures change but this doesn’t change concrete and steel. Why would the values remain if discrimination is no longer created by the artifact?
technological mediation
technological artifacts sit in the middle on the path between a person and their perception of the world, altering it
Latour’s Actor-Network Theory
an artifact and its designer and user together become one actant that performs the actions that involve the 3
Heidegger’s Technology as a way of Revealing
technological artifacts reveals to us the new possibilities that were previously unavailable, but this is bad because then humans view everything as reserves to be used
Illies and Meijers
Similar to Heidegger but in an optimistic way, that more options are always better
First Order Responsibility
Everyone has responsibility to choose the morally right option from all that is available
Second Order Responsibility
Engineers have a special responsibility in indirectly deciding what options become available for users