1/38
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Operationalisation definition
Making the variables in an investigation detailed and specific in a way they can be measured.
Extraneous variables
Variables in the environment that may affect the results of the study.
Situational Variables (In the environment)
Participant Variables (In the participants)
Situational Variables
Stimulus (Light/Sound)
Order Effect: The order in which tasks were completed
Demand Characteristics: Participants behaviour is altered to the perceived aim of the study
Investigator Effect: The investigator unintentionally gives hints to the participants as to the aim of the study, altering their behavior
Participant Variables
Extraneous variables specific to the participant of the study
Mood
Tolerance
Life experiences
Hypothesis
Null hypothesis: No relation
Directional hypothesis: Specific relationship
Non-Directional hypothesis: Non-specific
Experimental hypothesis: For experiments conducted in laboratory/field experiments
Sampling Methods
Random sampling: Target population has an equal chance of being chosen
Stratified sampling: Ensures sub-groups of target population is proportionally represented
Sample error: When a sample differs in qualities it intends to represent
Volunteer sampling: Those willing
Opportunity sampling: Participants readily available
Reliability
The consistency of the outcome
Validity
Whether the study measures it intended to measure
Operant Conditioning (Skinner) (Cognitive theory of criminality)
Positive Reinforcement: Receiving repeating
Negative reinforcement: Avoiding repeating
Positive punishment: Receiving avoiding
Negative punishment: Removing avoiding
Primary & Secondary reinforcers
Operant conditioning (Criminality) SW
Implies criminality can be reversed
Can explain a wide range of crimes but not all
Crimes still happen in the absence of reinforcers
Social learning theory (Criminality)
Behaviour is modelled by those around us
Attention
Retention
Reproduction
Vicarious reinforcement
Social learning theory (Criminality) SW
On the basis that children learn by observing
Explains why those exposed to criminality are more likely to become criminals
Not all crimes can easily be explained by observation (murder)
Evidence to support (Bandura Ross)
Evidence from these studies only measure the short term effect
Biological explanation (Criminality) (Eysenck)
Suggests that criminality is biological.
Eysenck’s PEN score
Psychotism, Extraversion, Neurcotism
Those with high PEN score are more likely to be criminals
Biological explanation (Criminality) (Eysenck) SW
Assumes that personality is always constant
Evidence that most criminals have high PEN scores
Takes into account psychological, social and biological factors
Self report questionnaires lead to subjective results
Bandura Ross (Transmission of aggression)
Aggression is imitated.
36 girls 36 boys. 37-69 months old.
Separated into groups based on aggression levels
Boys are more likely to copy physical aggression
Girls are equally likely to copy verbal aggression
Bandura Ross (Transmission of aggression) SW
Unnatural environment
Demand characteristics
Standardised procedure
Unethical (Did not protect participants)
Children were unaware they were being observed
Data confirmed by their teacher
Charlton (TV)
Video recording of children in playground 4 months before and 5 years after introduction of TV on the island.
Behaviour was counted by tally marks. (Pro-social/anti-social)
No overall effect of TV on children
Charlton (TV) SW
Used the same primary school
Close-knit community
Not the same programs as the mainland
Natural experiment
No demand characteristics as children were not aware they were being watched
Prison sentencing
High recidivism rates (Ineffective)
Protects the public
Prevents crimes from being committed while in prison
Can have bad influence due to negative environment
Serves as negative reinforcement for public
Ethical issues
Community sentencing
Cannot replace punishment due to ineffectively
Low completion rates
Prevents further influence in prison environment
Contradictory because can still be exposed to criminal behaviour outside
Provides a second chance as appropriate punishment for smaller crimes
Restorative justice
Causes emotional distress
May prove to be helpful to the victim but not to the recidivism rates
Requires willingness
Because of this willingness, it is hard to tell whether the criminal had been considering crime free life already
Costly and time consuming
Token economy
Ineffective outside of prison
Effective inside prison
Strong social influences
Requires to be maintained by prison
Easy to implement
Anger management
Not all crimes are committed due to anger
Criminals are carefully selected for this program
Can be abused by criminals (Psychopaths)
Requires willingness to change
Mixed results
Stages of sleep
4 stages of sleep + REM sleep
REM - Rapid eye movement sleep
Muscle inhibition
Sensory blockade
Dreaming
1 Cycle = 90m
Benefits of sleep
Evidence that sleep is needed for survival (Rats)
Stimulates learning
Growth
Avoid breakdown of proteins
Bodily rhythms
Circadian rhythms - 24h+ Ultradian rhythms >24h
SCN (Suprachiasmatic Nuclei) is responsible for the rhythms
Internal influences of sleep
The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) are affected by both internal and external influences.
Hormones:
Melatonin produced by the pineal gland is triggered by darkness
ACTH produced by the pituitary gland stimulates alertness
External influences of sleep
Zeitegerbers: Meaning time givers
Mainly light. Light comes into the retina alert the body clock.
SW Internal influences of sleep
Blind man has a internal body clock of around 24hours
There are different types of blindness, so this can be ineffective
Evidence from animals to prove SCN controls the circadian rhythms
Animal studies cannot be generalised to humans
Studies support that melatonin influences sleep
SW External influences of sleep
Practical applications such as working shifts
Evidence for external cues
Differences in findings
Unnatural experiments
Sleep disorders
Insomnia
Difficulty in sleeping
Not feeling refreshed on waking
Irritable and difficulty concentrating
HIGH ACTH
Narcolepsy
Excessive day time sleepiness
Cataplexy (Loss of muscle power)
Hallucinations
Sleep paralysis
LOW HYPOCRETIN
Freud (Unconscious mind)
Id: I want
Ego: Balance
Superego: You cannot have (Moral conscious)
Freud’s theory of dreaming
Manifest content: the story the dreamer is telling
Latent content: the meaning behind the dream
Dream work is the way the mind keeps unconscious thoughts hidden while dreaming to protect the individual
Condensation: many ideas into one
Displacement: focus is being taken away by something less relevant
Secondary elaboration: building a story
Freud’s theory of dreaming SW
He was able to study the unconscious mind
Considered to be unscientific because he was not able to objectively measure it
Cannot easily be tested
Non-generalisable
Qualitative data
Evidence to support dreams guard sleep
Hobson & McCarley (Activation Synthesis)
Neurobiological explanation of dreaming.
Activation - Random firing of the pons
Synthesis - The brain receives these random signals and tries to make sense of it
Internally generated information due to sensory blockade in REM sleep
Hobson & McCarley SW
Model has been built on many times
Still being used today
Most say that their dreams make sense
Evidence from animals cannot be done on humans due to ethical reasons
Evidence from animals cannot be applied to humans
Little Hans + SW
Scientific procedure
Qualitative data
Non-generalisable
Could be biased
Fear could be explained by learning theory instead
Siffre 6 Months in a cave
Siffre wanted to see the body’s natural rhythm without external cues
Sleep-wake cycle varied, he was unable to tell the difference between these periods of time.
He developed symptoms of depression, psychological problems, bad eyesight and memory issues.
Siffre SW
Non-generalisable
Longitudinal study
Qualitative and quantitate
Artificial lighting acting as cues