1/3
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Social Policies
-1881 - Statute of State Security introduced - led to the banning of all kinds of meetings and dismissed trial by jury - also a clampdown on publications with official censoring written material before it was published
-1881 - Russification - policy of transforming the different peoples of the Russian Empire into ‘pure’ Rus - all schools taught in Russian - launched pogroms against Jews
-1882 - Factory inspectors introduced to improve health and safety - especially for women and children - however, only around 200 inspectors for whole of Russia - were mistrusted
-1883 - Peasant Land Bank - introduced by Bunge - domestic policy to provide cheap loans for the purchase of land - all peasants forced to pay redemption payments - brought down the amount paid by those already involved
-1891 - adverse weather → famine - resulted in 350,000 deaths - some blamed central govt. - finance minister raised tax on consumer goods - meant the population had to pay more for everyday items
-Orthodox and non-Orthodox religion remained under state control across the period - Orthodox church important to the tsars as it acted as a form of social control
-In education, Alexander III took the exclusion policy further by banning lower-class children from attending secondary schools - in universities, autonomy was chipped away at with elections to councils scrapped and replaced with an appointment system
1891 Famine
-Caused by adverse weather, and worsened by outbreaks of cholera and typhus
-350,000 deaths
-Blame placed on central govt., who coped very well compared to peasants - govt. accused of holding back grain from the bulk of the population - situation worsened by finance minister’s decision to raise taxes on consumer goods
-Peasants resorted to selling off surplus grain to attempt to cope with inflated food prices
-Tsar banned grain exports and set up a special committee on famine relief, and funded emergency help - too little too late
-More people joining revolutionary groups as a result - wanted to replace tsar with democratic govt.
-Govt. called on public to help - opened the door for new wave of public activity and debate which the govt. could not control
-Russian society politicised by the famine - became more organised in opposition to the govt.
-Zemstvos expanded activities to revive rural economy - doctors, teachers and engineers formed professional bodies - began to demand more influence over public policy
Industrial Reforms (Alexander III and Nicholas II)
-1886 - Poll Tax - based on number of people in a household
-1883 - Peasant Land Bank introduced
-Move towards greater state ownership of railways
-Witte’s Great Spurt
Went back to idea of taking out foreign loans, raising taxes and interest rates to boost available capital for industry investment
Resurrected Reutern’s idea of encouraging foreign experts coming to Russia
1897 - placemen of the rouble on the gold standard to give potential investors confidence in Russian currency
Insisted that most investment went on heavy industry and railways - this had worked for Britain, France, Germany and somewhat Russia
Further state-planned industrialisation - move away from private enterprise
Led to: coal production doubling, iron/steel production increasing 7-fold, stimulus provided to development in ‘new’ technologies in oil and chemical industries, amount of railway track open increased 17k miles → 31k miles between 1891-1901, income earned from industry rose from 42 million roubles → 161 million from 1893-1897
Criticisms: -neglected other parts of the industrial sector such as engineering and textiles, which was short sighted as the demand for metals came from these other industries -reliance on foreign capital has been criticised as dangerous as loans could be recalled and reliance on foreign tech experts stunted the emergence of home-grown talent
Agricultural Reforms (Alexander III and Nicholas II)
-Alexander III blames rural problems on poor farming techniques deployed by peasants, and so introduced a ministry of agriculture - Historian J.N Westwood blames rural troubles on the character of peasants, as they were resentful, indolent, disrespectful, unruly and intoxicated
-Nicholas II in 1906 instructed Stolypin, as a result of rural unrest 1905-7, to revamp govt. policy over land distribution - aim was to use land distribution to build and strengthen the class of more able, educated and ‘best’ peasants, in hopes they’d act as a role model for peasants to follow, and a force against the mir
-Stolypin’s ‘wager on the strong’ involved:
Unused/poorly utilised land made available to the Peasant Land Bank - forward-looking peasants could then buy the land from the bank on favourable terms
Peasants still farming strips, due to the strength of the mir, given the right to consolidate their land into smallholdings - hereditary household plots not affected by this - land could not be immediately sold on to non-peasants - designed to ensure the mainstay of the Russian rural economy became the small peasant farm run independently by peasants
-Wager on the Strong backfired for the following reasons:
Process led to an expansion in the numbers joining the wealthier class of peasants who in theory would be more loyal to the tsar - were not totally satisfied with the stipulations of the Stolypin reform as they believed that the best land was still inaccessible to peasants
By 1914 - about 2 million peasants had left the village communes - left some regions short of rural labour - WW1 accelerated this - such an exodus added to the challenge of keeping supplies of food going to the growing urban population