1/70
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
What did Darwin suggest?
the evolution of both physical and mental traits
How did Romanes define intelligence?
The ability to make adjustments or modify old ones, in accordance with the results of its own individual experience
Cognition
“knowledge or thinking”
Often a causal discourse that is voluntary, deliberate and conscious
“Did I leave the coffee pit on?”
Cognition may lead to actions not clearly explained by external stimuli
Infringing more on Descartes
Cognitive Ethology
the study of the ability of animals to express conscious thought and intention
Ex: Clever Hans (horse) could “spell”, “calculate fractions”, and “tell time”
Animal Cognition
models and constructs used to explain behaviors not characterized by simple S-R associations
A mirrored enclosure → happily-marked → mark-touching
Plotnick et al., 2006; Amazing Apes: Self Awareness
Elephants and Apes display “self-awareness” they have mental representation
Learning and cognition are…
not necessarily in opposition:
CS evokes a “mental representation” of the US (SS learning)
R-O and S-O associations are “internal”
Memory
ability to respond to or recount information that was experienced earlier
Ex: who was your 1st grade teacher? Rules and skill of an old sport
Components of Learning and Memory
Acquisition, Retention, and Retrieval
Acquisition pt 1
exposure to stimuli or information
Retention
time period in which information is retained
Retrieval
tests of memory for the original experience / recovery of stored information used to guide behavior / the recollection of memories to working memory
Studies of learning
manipulate acquisition parameters
Studies of memory
focus on retention and retrieval
Studying Memory in Animals: Hunter (1913)
Subjects: raccoon, dog, rat
Phase 1: Training
Subject placed in start box (S)
Light on above baited box (1, 2, or 3)
Immediate choice
Phase 2: Memory Task
Subject placed in S
Light on above 1, 2, or 3
Delayed choice
Result:
Dogs: 5min
Raccoon: 25 sec
Rat: 10 sec
Findings reflect working AND reference memory
Working memory
operates when info needs to be maintained long enough to complete a task (test trial)
ex: Remembering items you just put in a Bloody Mary
Reference memory
long-term retrieval of rules necessary for the use of incoming and acquired info (training) - Rule
ex: Remembering the items needed to make a Bloody Mary
Delayed-Matching-To-Sample:
the SAMPLE identifies the correct response on a trial. The SAMPLE is removed before the subject is allowed to respond (DELAY). The subject is then asked to identify the MATCHING SAMPLE for reinforcement
What determines accuracy? Grant, 1976:
Pigeons trained on DMS
Test sample duration:
1, 4, 8, and 14 seconds
Test sample-tria; delay:
0, 20, 40, 60 seconds
Results:
Accuracy increase as sample duration increased
Accuracy decreases as sample-trial delay increased
Trace Decay Hypothesis:
presentation of a stimulus produces changes in the CNS that decay after the stimulus is removed
Weak stimuli will decay quickly (ex: what did you eat last sunday?)
Strong stimuli will be maintained in memory (ex: what did you eat when you got food poisoning?)
Does training impact DMS? Sargisson and White, 2001:
Training on DMS
Sample-trial delay:
0, 2, 4, or 6 sec (gets used to training parameter)
Trained to 80% correct
Test: DMS w 0-10 sec sample-trial delay
Results:
Decay prominent in 0-sec grup
BUT, overall performance is best when tested w training delay (circled)
stimulus control: delay
What is learned on the DMS Task?
General and Specific Rule
General Rule
“choose the stimulus that is the same as the sample”
will get correct
Specific Rule
“select green after green” - learned to guide behavior
will get 50% correct
Tests of Transfer
Once DMS is learned to 80% with two samples, a new pair is employed. Does the subject transfer (generalize) the rule?
Transferring rules onto new stimuli
Oden et al., 1988: Chimp
Trials-Unique Procedure
Forces organism to learn general rule. On each trial, different stimuli serve as matching and non-matching samples. Do they learn DMS?
Once organism gets to 80%, its guaranteed they learned a general rule
impossible for specific because sample never shows up again
For us to survive in our environment
we need to know how it is laid out
Radial Arm Maze: Rodent spatial memory
8 arms with “baited” end ups, Rodent is placed in center
Allowed to pick up food, Cups are not refilled
Strategies
Inefficient - random arm entrance
Efficient - remember when it has or has not yet visited
Correct response on performance in the radial arm maze
entering an unvisited arm
requires little training
Rodents perform this task well
Mirrors natural foraging tendencies
Rodents can remembers 24 arms w/ no errors
Can retain 24 arm food placements for up to 4 hours
How do the nutcrackers and rodents remember?
spatial memory requires an INTERNAL MAP
Extramaze (outside maze) cues are critical. Examples of extramaze cues:
Light
Posters
Humans
Switching cues disrupts performance
If cues are removed, rats use…
intramaze (inside maze) cues
perform above change, but less efficiently
Beatty and Shavalia, 1980:
Using external environment to create map to internalize then use for later
8 arm radial maze
Rats allowed 4 arm choices
Wait for 5 min - 24 hrs
Upon return, correct choices was entrance to un-entered arm
Rats performed with up to 4 h delays at 95% correct
How does memory guide? Hoffman et al., 1999:
post-training , they repeated the maze test. But let rats step off maze
Efficient
Path
Random
Wall
It's b. path, they continue to use visual cues
If arms are removed altogether, they still follow path
On the Delayed Matching to Sample, a monkey who has performed to 80% criterion on a pair of samples is able to switch fluidly to another pair of samples. As such we know he has learned a ________ rule based on the ________ .
General Rule; Test of Transfer
Stimulus Coding
the transformation of acquired information for retention and later retrieval
How do we code spatial information?
List of individual maps? Not likely, we have a limit
A cognitive map? Sort of, but a bit vague
Navigational mechanisms? definitely
this is because NM is most predictive of a correct response
Beacon Following
association with the goal (navigational mechanism)
Ex: rock near food patch
Landmark
goal at a fixed location away from a stimulus (navigational mechanism)
Ex: shrub by rock
Relation between landmarks
goal located between landmarks (navigational mechanism)
Ex: space between tree and shrub, containing rock and food patch
Coding strategies:
Retrospective Memory: remember what you've had (memory load increases over time)
Prospective Memory: remember what you have yet to try (memory load decreases over time)
Switching strategies reduces memory load and increases remembering…
start with retrospective coding, switch to prospective coding
Kesner and DeSpain, 1988: Rats
Subjects: rats
12 arm radial maze
Train: to criterion
Pre-test: rats allowed varying arm entities
Test: 15 min delta
In maze, given choice between
A previously entered alley
A new alley
Reinforced answer: choosing a new alley
Results:
Errors increase on 1st 8 trials (retrospective)
Errors decrease on trials 9-12 (prospective)
Kesner and DeSpain, 1988: Undergrads
Subjects: undergrads
Student test: 16 square grid
Test: “X” moved square to square
Number of squares visited varied
After last square, delay of 5 seconds
Choice between two squares
Did the “X” visit Square 1?
Did the “X” visit Square 2?
Results:
Errors increase on 1st 8 trials (retrospective)
Errors decrease on trials 9-16 (prospective)
Memory retention is impacted by:
An unpredictable stimulus (interference)
Cues indicating whether something should or should not be remembered
Direct forgetting
a process by which info not relevant to a task is actively ignored
R-cue - Remember Cue
F-cue - Forget Cue
This is stimulus control!
Failure of memory in the healthy organism is more likely a result of ___ than loss of information
retrieval failure
Retrieval cues
reminders that produce retrieval of memory
Borovsky and Rovee-Collier, 1990:
Stimuli presented during acquisition can serve as retrieval cues
Subjects: 6 month old infants
Training: playpen liners (retrieval cues)
Patterned (striped or checkered)
Operant response
Response - leg kick
Outcome - mobile movement
Test: 1 day post-training
Performance is best with SAME liner (retrieval cue)
Lasted up to 14 days
☆ Children have capacity for learning and memory very early
Forgetting
memory failure resulting in lack of response in accordance with past experiences or learning
Negative forgetting
has a negative impact on performance
ex: explain the reinforcer devaluation procedure? - cant
Positive forgetting
positively impact performance, increase response variety
ex: learning new password
Proactive interference
A source of negative forgetting; previously learned info disrupts new memories
ex: say it w me.. “Omission training!” “positive punishment??”
Retroactive interference
A source of negative forgetting; new memories disrupt previously learned info
ex: oh shoot, who did i meet when we got here?
Retrograde Amnesia
graded memory loss of info close to the cement that induced the loss
Ex: seizure, blackout, concussion
Zhou and Riccio, 1995:
Rats in single shock avoidance trial
Going to dark side of box gives shock
Mild concussions then various
Training-concussion intervals
Avoidance: latency to visit shock side
Results: reduced avoidance when training-concussion intervals short
Zhou and Riccio, 1995: Post-concussion
a retrieval cue can reverse amnesia
G1: concussion
Avoidance trial, concussion (1 min)
G2: Reminder
Shock avoidance trial, concussion (1 min later)
+ shock (reminder) in novel environment
Findings:
Concussion group is amnesic
G2 rats w/ reminder show avoidance
Retrieval is facilitated!
By starting with prospective memory coding, over time, the memory load will:
Decrease
Learning and memory must have a neutral substrate!
The Brain
Where is memory located?
Engram - physical representation of learning and memory
Lashley, 1929
Cuts in the cortex before/after maze
No single cut, big or small impaired learning
Only amount removed predicted impairment
Lashley concluded the search for the engram is a “hopeless endeavor”
Acquisition of knowledge
engages several brain circuits
Complex memories are
retained in multiple areas
Memories are
retrieved from many brain areas
Acquisition
the strengthening or weakening of neutral connections as a result of experience with the environment
When cells fire together (associate), they wire together
Bliss and Lomo, 1973:
How does neutral stimulation affect the activity of downstream targets?
Stimulated hippocampus input:
Moderate
Strong
Weak
Recorded downstream activity
Results of stimulation:
Moderate - moderate activity
No change in synaptic strength
Strong - long-term potentiation (LTP)
Enhanced synaptic strength - LEARNING
Weak - long-term depression (LTD)
Reduced synaptic strength - LEARNING
These changes last days to weeks
Memory must have structural component
LTP (long-term potentiation) increases
the efficiency of memory paths:
Increase number of dendritic spines
Increase size of dendritic spine head
Increase excitatory receptor density on dendritic spine head
More stable and receptive to input
Retention
the permanent physical change in neutral circuitry coding for the information
Once rehearsal conditions are met, information is consolidated and retained in PERMANENT memory stores
Wilder Penfield, (1891-1976)
Medial temporal lobe stimulation induced specific memories
MRI confirms that consolidated memory is stored in and retrieved from cortex
Retention and consolidation are dependent upon
…the rehearsal of the information
The Rehearsal Circuit
Hippocampus
Basal forebrain
Thalamus
Amygdala