language thought and communication

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/244

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

245 Terms

1
New cards

Schema

A mental framework of beliefs and expectations that influence cognitive processing. We are born with some schemas but they develop in complexity with experience of the world.

2
New cards

Piaget's theory: language & thought

Language depends on thought

3
New cards

•Children develop language by matching the correct words to their existing knowledge of the world

4
New cards

•Understanding of a concept (schema) comes first then they learn how to express their understanding of it - through the words they use

5
New cards

Piaget - thought and understanding come first

then language develops after

6
New cards
7
New cards

Young children

8
New cards

•If a child learns a word before they have a schema for that word they are simply parroting it.

9
New cards
10
New cards

•Language can exist without thought but a child can only use language properly when they understand what they are talking about

11
New cards

Development of language - Piaget theory

•Children don't begin to speak until the end of their first year

12
New cards

•Before age of 1 = developing schemas as learn to co-ordinate sensory & motor information

13
New cards

•Understand the idea or concept of language before they begin to use it

14
New cards

•Age 2 onwards - language development makes rapid progress

15
New cards

•Can talk about things not physically present eg future and their feelings

16
New cards

Still self centred. Can't see things from another's point of view

17
New cards

Logical thinking - Piaget theory

•By 7 - language use becomes much more mature and logical

18
New cards

•As begin to decentre they can consider and talk about the views of others

19
New cards

Begin to question

criticise and come up with new ideas of their own.

20
New cards

children think differently to adults

•Difference in thinking expressed in language used

21
New cards

•Animism - all things are alive

22
New cards

•Expressed their understanding in their language

23
New cards

•Bumped head on the 'naughty table'

24
New cards

•Calling a plant 'tired' when it was wilting

25
New cards

•'Did it cry when the hole was made' on seeing a hollow horse chestnut tree

26
New cards

•(Piaget

27
New cards

Evaluation of Piaget's Theory(language

thought and communication

28
New cards

•Early language development is not random

29
New cards

•When children start talking they may use two-word phrases eg 'mummy-sock'

30
New cards

•Children already have some understanding of the relationship between objects and people in real world before they start to talk

31
New cards

•If they didn't

their early talk would just be unconnected words

32
New cards

•Suggests children start to use language only when they have developed the right schema - supports Piaget's theory

33
New cards
34
New cards
  • Language comes first

35
New cards

•Sapir-Whorf hypothesis suggests the opposite to Piaget's theory

36
New cards

•Can only think about and understand the world through the language available to them.

37
New cards

•If someone is raised in a culture where there is no word or phrase for a particular idea

then that person isn't able to think about this

38
New cards

•Supported by cross-cultural studies of language and thought

39
New cards

So: Sapir-Whorf suggests Piaget was wrong about the relationship and thought. At least some of the time language may come first

40
New cards
41
New cards

-Schemas

42
New cards

•Schemas cannot be scientifically measured

43
New cards

•How do we know someone has developed a schema?

44
New cards

•They can't be measured

45
New cards

•If they can't be measured

there is no proof they are there

46
New cards

•Suggests that Piaget's theory of language and thought is not based on solid scientific evidence

47
New cards

Sapir-wharf hypothesis

The theory suggests that the language a person speaks has a great influence on the way they think and perceive. The weak version of the hypothesis says that language affects what we perceive and remember. The strong version says that language determines thought

48
New cards

thinking depends on language

§Sapir & Whorf believed language comes first and thought comes after

49
New cards

§Words influence our thoughts

memories and perceptions

50
New cards

§But

51
New cards

§There is a difference between saying words influence our thoughts and saying words determine our thoughts

52
New cards

Two versions of the hypothesis

a strong version and a weak version

53
New cards

Strong version

The strong version: Language determines thought

54
New cards

§Language determines thought

55
New cards

§If a language has no words for a certain thought

object or idea

56
New cards

§The language you learn determines what you can think about

57
New cards
58
New cards

Can be difficult to translate some words and ideas from one language to another - give me examples?!

59
New cards

Franz Boas (1911) - also worked with Sapir - described Inuit language as having 4 different words for snow. Whorf increased it to 7. some sources say now 27

60
New cards

Language and culture are linked The Inuit are able to think about and perceive snow in ways not available to English langage speakers who haven't grown up in that culture using that language

61
New cards

Weak version

The weak version: Language influences thought

62
New cards

§Language influences the way we think about things but does not completely determine what they think

63
New cards

§It is possible for native speakers of English to think about the different types of snow identified in the Inuit language without having the actual words for the variation

64
New cards
65
New cards

Inuit words for 'soft snow on the ground'

fine snow carried by the wind'

66
New cards

Which version is better?

§Sapir & Whorf both preferred the weaker version of the hypothesis

67
New cards

§Cross-cultural studies have shown how language can influence thinking in two ways:

68
New cards

§Perception & memory

69
New cards

Information more easily described in a particular language will be better remembered and more easily perceived than information that's more difficult to describe

70
New cards

Behaviorist challnge

Behaviourist challenge

71
New cards

§John Watson (1919)

72
New cards

§Thinking is a form of sub-vocal speech (i.e. unspoken)

73
New cards

§Thinking involves tiny movements of the tongue and larynx

74
New cards

Dr Scott Smith 1947

75
New cards

Behaviourists are only interested in behaviour that can be observed and measured

76
New cards

Dr smith - took a form of poison - curare - paralyses all muscles - even the tiny ones in the vocal chords. If Watson was right

Smith would lose the ability to think. He didn't. Did lose the ability to breathe and was kept alive using an oxygen supply. Smith was even able to solve puzzles whilst under the influence of the poison. More to thinking than sub-vocal speech

77
New cards

Evaluation of Sapir-wharf

-The differences are exaggerated

78
New cards

§Evidence of language differences may be exaggerated

79
New cards

§Geoffrey Pellum (1989) 'Great Eskimo vocabulary Hoax'

80
New cards

§Quanik - snow in the air

81
New cards

§Aput - snow on the ground

82
New cards

Challenges the conclusion that language may determine thought - language differences between Inuit and English speakers may not be all that great

83
New cards
84
New cards
  • Thoughts come before language

85
New cards

§Just because a culture has more words doesn't mean that the words came first

86
New cards

§Even if the Inuit language does have more words for snow

the more important question is why

87
New cards

§Suggests that language develops because of the way we perceive our environment not the other way around.

88
New cards

§Thoughts (about the environment) come before language as Piaget suggested

89
New cards
90
New cards
91
New cards

Sapir & Whorf did not consider why there are cultural differences in language

92
New cards

More likely explanation is that the Inuit language reflects the environment within which its population live. If there is always lots of snow

then the language which develops will include lots of different words for snow because the Inuit experience will have led them to make finer distinctions between types of snow. SO

93
New cards
94
New cards

+restricted and elaborated code

95
New cards

§Explains the link between language and intelligence

96
New cards

§Basil Bernstein (1961)

97
New cards

§Called restricted and elaborated codes

98
New cards

§Intelligence influenced by language they hear and speak

99
New cards

§Working class children will always fall behind in school because the restricted code they use will have a negative effect on their ability to think

100
New cards

§If there is a link between the language you use and intelligence

this would support the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis that language influences thought