1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
How do you figure out the cause of something?
Do an experiment
confounding variable (Follow up: How do you prevent this)
A variable that can skew results because it wasn’t planned for and interferes with the experiment (Follow up answer: have two different test groups)
operationalization
EVERYTHING in your experiment must be defined and measured (can’t operationalize the word “wrong)
experimenter effect
the person running the experiment acts a certain way and causes the participant to change their behavior
single-blind study
the person in the experiment doesn’t know what group they are in
double-blind study
the person in the experiment AND the one running it doesn’t know the groups
behavior
outward actions and reactions
Wilhelm Wundt
Father of Psychology (because started the idea of looking inward - what psychology is all about), Consciousness can be broken down into OBJECTVE INTROSPECTION
objective introspection
objectively looking at your own thoughts without bias
Edward Titchener
structuralism, every experience can be broken into moments and sensations
structuralism
structure of the mind
William James
REJECTED Wilhelm Wundt’s idea that consciousness can be studied (He believed that consciousness is changing in every moment and it isn’t possible), his idea is FUNCTIONALISM
functionalism
how the mind allows us to live, how behavior traits aid in our survival (not only based on physical traits
Max Wertheimer
REJECTED structuralism, saw that perceiving and sensing couldn’t be broken down, developed gestalt psychology
Gestalt Psychology
Studying the WHOLE of things and not small pieces
Sigmund Feud
We repress our unwanted thoughts into an unconscious mind, the repressed urges caused disorders in his patients, formed the idea of PSYCHOANAYLSIS
Psychoanaylsis
exploring one’s unconscious thoughts and how that might influence behavior
Ivan Pavlov
you can create a reflex for something that wasn’t related before, developed CONDITIONING
conditioning
making someone have a reflex for something that was completely unrelated before
John B. Watson
Was against everything (structuralism, functionalism, psychoanalysis), developed BEHAVIORISM, saw all behavior as learned, used a rat to prove phobias are learned through conditioning, agreed with PAVLOV
Behaviorism
observable behavior ONLY (no conscious or thoughts or emotions)
Mary Cover Jones
Counterconditioning (used a rat too in order to make it not scared and used to the rabbit)
7 Modern Perspectives in Psychology
Psychodynamic = motivations behind behavior, early childhood, development of self
Behavioral = observable behaviors, OPERANT CONDITIONING
Humanistic = we have free will and can reach SELF ACTUALIZATION
Cognitive = how we think, remember, and store information
Sociocultural = how the people around us influence us
Biopsychological = our behavior is the direct result of the events in the body (something inside my body happened to make me act/be this way)
Evolutionary = mental characteristics we humans all share
operant conditioning
how voluntary behavior is learned, behavior with good consequences will happen again and be strengthened (think baby crying and getting candy)
self-actualization
reaching one’s full potential
goals of psych
describe EVERYTHING
Explain why these things are happening
Predict when it will happen again
Control how it can be changed
5 steps of scientific approach
Perceive or notice the question
Develop a hypothesis
Test your hypothesis
Draw conclusions
Report your results
confirmation bias
only noting or confirming things that go along with your way of thinking
descriptive methods
naturalistic observation = seeing animals in their natural habitat and observing their behavior (room for observer bias)
participant observation = being actively involved with the subject but secretly observing their behavior
laboratory observation
case studies = observing one person in great detail (disadvantage: can’t apply results to other people because specific to this person)
surveys
courtesy bias
don’t give your real opinion because you don’t want to offend or make anyone upset (ME literally)
correlation coefficient
if closer to 0 than weaker
if both are going up or down then CC is positive
if one is going up and the other is going down then CC is negative
signified with “r”
value assertions
saying things are right or wrong but what does “right” or “wrong” really mean
correlation DOES NOT equal causation because…
there could be confounding variables
no directionality
unclear
correlation won’t specific WHY this is happening but it will just show you there is a relationship between them
correlation
can be positive or negative
how closely 2 variables are related