1/3
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Theory 1: N. Kretzmann, “Abraham, Isaac, and Euthyphro: God and the Basis of Ethics” from Eleanor Stump and Michael Murray, Philosophy Religion: The Big Questions (Blackwell, 1999)
1. Divine Command Theory
Morality comes from God's commands.
Something is morally right because God commands it.
Something is morally wrong because God forbids it.
Example: God says “Do not murder” → murder is wrong.
Problem: This can make morality seem arbitrary. If God commanded something we normally consider wrong, would it suddenly become right?
Theory 2: N. Kretzmann, “Abraham, Isaac, and Euthyphro: God and the Basis of Ethics” from Eleanor Stump and Michael Murray, Philosophy Religion: The Big Questions (Blackwell, 1999)
2. Independent Moral Standards
Morality exists independently of God's commands.
God commands something because it is already morally good.
God doesn't create morality; instead, God recognizes or follows moral truths that already exist.
Problem: If morality exists independently of God, then God may not be the ultimate foundation of morality.
Theory 3: N. Kretzmann, “Abraham, Isaac, and Euthyphro: God and the Basis of Ethics” from Eleanor Stump and Michael Murray, Philosophy Religion: The Big Questions (Blackwell, 1999)
3. Divine Nature Theory
Morality is grounded in God's nature rather than God's arbitrary commands.
Instead of:
“Something is good because God commands it.”
the idea is:
“Something is good because it reflects God's inherently good nature.”
For example, God commands us to be loving because love is part of God's nature.
This attempts to avoid the Euthyphro dilemma because morality isn't based on random commands.
9
Theory 4: N. Kretzmann, “Abraham, Isaac, and Euthyphro: God and the Basis of Ethics” from Eleanor Stump and Michael Murray, Philosophy Religion: The Big Questions (Blackwell, 1999)
4. The Euthyphro Dilemma
Technically, this isn't a theory—it is a philosophical challenge.
It asks:
A. Is something good because God commands it?
OR
B. Does God command it because it is good?
Position | Basic idea | Main problem |
|---|---|---|
Divine Command | God commands → morally good | Morality may seem arbitrary |
Independent Morality | Already good → God commands | God isn't the source of morality |
Divine Nature | God's nature grounds morality | Must explain how God's nature determines moral truth |