Theories: N. Kretzmann, “Abraham, Isaac, and Euthyphro: God and the Basis of Ethics” from Eleanor Stump and Michael Murray, Philosophy Religion: The Big Questions (Blackwell, 1999)

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/3

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 7:39 PM on 8/31/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

4 Terms

1
New cards

Theory 1: N. Kretzmann, “Abraham, Isaac, and Euthyphro: God and the Basis of Ethics” from Eleanor Stump and Michael Murray, Philosophy Religion: The Big Questions (Blackwell, 1999)

1. Divine Command Theory

Morality comes from God's commands.


  • Something is morally right because God commands it.

  • Something is morally wrong because God forbids it.

  • Example: God says “Do not murder” → murder is wrong.


Problem: This can make morality seem arbitrary. If God commanded something we normally consider wrong, would it suddenly become right?

2
New cards

Theory 2: N. Kretzmann, “Abraham, Isaac, and Euthyphro: God and the Basis of Ethics” from Eleanor Stump and Michael Murray, Philosophy Religion: The Big Questions (Blackwell, 1999)

2. Independent Moral Standards

Morality exists independently of God's commands.


  • God commands something because it is already morally good.

  • God doesn't create morality; instead, God recognizes or follows moral truths that already exist.


Problem: If morality exists independently of God, then God may not be the ultimate foundation of morality.

3
New cards

Theory 3: N. Kretzmann, “Abraham, Isaac, and Euthyphro: God and the Basis of Ethics” from Eleanor Stump and Michael Murray, Philosophy Religion: The Big Questions (Blackwell, 1999)

3. Divine Nature Theory

Morality is grounded in God's nature rather than God's arbitrary commands.


Instead of:


“Something is good because God commands it.”


the idea is:


“Something is good because it reflects God's inherently good nature.”


For example, God commands us to be loving because love is part of God's nature.


This attempts to avoid the Euthyphro dilemma because morality isn't based on random commands.

9

4
New cards

Theory 4: N. Kretzmann, “Abraham, Isaac, and Euthyphro: God and the Basis of Ethics” from Eleanor Stump and Michael Murray, Philosophy Religion: The Big Questions (Blackwell, 1999)

4. The Euthyphro Dilemma

Technically, this isn't a theory—it is a philosophical challenge.


It asks:


A. Is something good because God commands it?


OR


B. Does God command it because it is good?


Position

Basic idea

Main problem

Divine Command

God commands → morally good

Morality may seem arbitrary

Independent Morality

Already good → God commands

God isn't the source of morality

Divine Nature

God's nature grounds morality

Must explain how God's nature determines moral truth