Robbers Cave Experiment - Vocabulary Flashcards

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/58

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering key terms and concepts from the Robbers Cave Experiment and its findings.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

59 Terms

1
New cards

Robbers Cave Experiment

A field study by Muzafer Sherif (1954 Robbers Cave State Park) examining how intergroup conflict arises from competition and how cooperation through superordinate goals can reduce prejudice.

2
New cards

Intergroup conflict

Hostility between two or more groups arising from competition over scarce resources.

3
New cards

Ingroup

The group with which a person identifies and feels loyalty toward.

4
New cards

Outgroup

A group perceived as different from one’s own group; often the target of prejudice.

5
New cards

Superordinate goals

Shared objectives that require cooperation between groups to achieve.

6
New cards

Realistic Conflict Theory

The idea that conflict between groups stems from competition over limited resources.

7
New cards

Social Identity Theory

Theory that part of a person’s self-concept comes from group membership and influences intergroup behavior.

8
New cards

Contact hypothesis

The proposition that increased contact between groups can reduce prejudice, though not always effective alone.

9
New cards

Stage one: Group formation

Phase where two groups are created and develop distinct identities, norms, and symbols.

10
New cards

Stage two: Intergroup competition

Phase in which groups compete in tasks, producing hostility and prejudice.

11
New cards

Stage three: Intergroup cooperation

Phase where groups work together to achieve common goals, reducing conflict.

12
New cards

Eagles

One of the two groups formed at Robbers Cave; developed its own symbols and norms.

13
New cards

Rattlers

The other group formed at Robbers Cave; described as tougher and more aggressive.

14
New cards

Tug-of-war

A competitive activity used to create intergroup tension.

15
New cards

Treasure hunt

A competitive activity used to exacerbate intergroup rivalry.

16
New cards

Water supply interruption

A deliberately created crisis requiring both groups to cooperate to restore supply.

17
New cards

Movie funding task

A cooperative task where groups contributed money to rent a movie, promoting collaboration.

18
New cards

Group symbols

Visual identifiers (names, logos) that represent each group and their identity.

19
New cards

Group norms

Shared expectations about behavior within a group.

20
New cards

Group leader

A person who emerged as a leadership figure within each group.

21
New cards

Ingroup favoritism

Positive attitudes and preference toward one’s own group.

22
New cards

Outgroup prejudice

Negative attitudes toward the group outside one’s own.

23
New cards

Attitude questionnaire

Measurement tool used to assess participants’ views of ingroup and outgroup.

24
New cards

Hidden observation

Observing participants covertly with cameras or microphones.

25
New cards

Informed consent

Permission granted by participants or guardians; ethical concerns arise when participants are unaware of the study.

26
New cards

Non-random group assignment

Groups formed by the researchers through a specific process rather than random allocation.

27
New cards

Field experiment

An experiment conducted in a real-world setting outside the lab.

28
New cards

Summer camp setting

The naturalistic environment where the Robbers Cave study occurred.

29
New cards

Proximity

Physical closeness between groups; in this study, proximity initially increased conflict rather than reducing it.

30
New cards

Outgroup friendship increase

Rising number of friendships across group lines after cooperative goals were introduced.

31
New cards

Ingroup friendship

Friendships developed within one’s own group.

32
New cards

1954 camp results

Findings showing reduced intergroup conflict and prejudice after achieving superordinate goals.

33
New cards

1953 camp results

Findings showing failure to create intergroup conflict; participants inferred the study’s purpose, questioning reliability.

34
New cards

Reliability

Consistency of results across different camps or replications.

35
New cards

Generalizability

Extent to which findings apply to other populations and settings.

36
New cards

Ethics criticisms

Concerns about consent, deception, and covert observation in the study.

37
New cards

Percent Eagles friends from Rattlers

7.5% of the Eagles’ friends were from the Rattlers.

38
New cards

Percent Rattlers friends from Eagles

6.4% of the Rattlers’ friends were from the Eagles.

39
New cards

Phase of group interaction: Group formation indicators

Emergence of group leaders, nicknames, jokes, and group-specific norms.

40
New cards

Pro-social behavior in Robbers Cave

Cooperation between groups to achieve shared goals (e.g., fixing water, funding movie).

41
New cards

Stereotyping

Attributing generalized beliefs about a group, often oversimplified and biased.

42
New cards

Discrimination

Unfavorable or unfair treatment of outgroup members as a result of prejudice.

43
New cards

Questionnaires (attitudes toward groups)

Tools used to quantify individuals’ attitudes toward ingroup and outgroup.

44
New cards

Observation methods

Use of direct observation, sometimes covert, to record behavior and interactions.

45
New cards

Muzafer Sherif

Lead researcher and psychologist who conducted the Robbers Cave Experiment.

46
New cards

Intergroup hostility mechanisms

Processes like name-calling, raids, and scuffles that arise from competition.

47
New cards

Symbolic identity

The symbolic aspects (names, logos) that differentiate groups.

48
New cards

Intergroup contact effects

Contact between groups can help or hinder prejudice reduction depending on context.

49
New cards

Ethical concern: deception

Participants were unaware of being studied; raises ethical questions.

50
New cards

Phase indicators: first, second, third stages

The sequence: group formation, intergroup competition, and intergroup cooperation.

51
New cards

Group norms differences

Eagles and Rattlers developed distinct social norms (e.g., swearing).

52
New cards

Friendship dynamics

Changes in friendships within and between groups across stages.

53
New cards

Implications for psychology

Evidence informing Realistic Conflict Theory and Social Identity Theory.

54
New cards

The study’s origin year

1954 Robbers Cave Experiment conducted at Robbers Cave State Park.

55
New cards

Field setting advantages

Natural context can enhance ecological validity of findings.

56
New cards

Limitations of sample

Only white, middle-class, Protestant boys; limits generalizability.

57
New cards

Kinetic outcomes

Physical or overt actions (e.g., raids, scuffles) reflecting hostility.

58
New cards

Cognitive outcomes

Attitudinal shifts, stereotypes, and prejudice formation or reduction.

59
New cards

Leadership emergence

Spontaneous appearance of leaders within each group during stage one.