1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
dùng con số để làm chủ ngữ
ex: 175.5 million pounds were funded for this police force by the national government in 1785.
dùng tên của đồ thị để làm chủ ngữ
ex: the national government funded for this police force 175.5 million pounds in 1785.
dùng modifier (đơn vị)
ex: the amount of money funded for this police force by the national government was 175.5 million pounds.
be the primary contributor to = be responsible for the largest = account for the largest amount / proportion / number = be the dominant feature.
ở vị trí cao nhất
be the least significant = account for the smallest proportion / number / amount = be responsible for the smallest amount of = constitute the lowest share of
chiếm tỉ lệ thấp nhất.
đẩy thời gian lên làm chủ ngữ
ex: the next 50 years recorded a gradual upward trend in the figures for both cars and trains, finishing at 3 tonnes / from… tonnes to 3 tonnes.
this upward trend continued in 2010, with + data1, whereas data2
dùng khi có cái gì đó tăng liên tục trong một giai đoạn nhưng miêu tả 1 câu thì đơn giản quá cho nên có thể tách ra như vậy.
ex: By 2000, the number of relocations due to traffic congestion had increased significantly to about 35,000, while lifestyle-related migration increased more moderately to around 30,000. This upward trend continued in 2010, with traffic reaching the peak of 60000, narrowing the gap with cost of living, whereas lifestyle rose gradually to 40000, remaining the lowest reason overall.
narrowing the gap with…, remaining the lowest / highest … overall, confirming that … continue to be the dominant feature.
dùng để so sánh các số liệu
ex: by 2010, despite a slight fall, the number remained high at 80000, confirming that cost of living continued to be the dominant feature for migration.
This upward trend continued in 2010, with traffic reaching the peak of 60000, narrowing the gap with cost of living, whereas lifestyle rose gradually to 40000, remaining the lowest reason overall.