Defense of Secondary Pharmaceutical Patents: The Nexium Case Study

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/19

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards covering key vocabulary related to secondary pharmaceutical patents, chiral switches, patent law doctrines (teaching away, obvious to try, unexpected results), and related terminology as discussed in the Nexium case study lecture.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

20 Terms

1
New cards

Secondary Pharmaceutical Patent (SPP)

A patent that protects aspects of a drug other than the primary active pharmaceutical ingredient, such as new uses, dosage forms, or enantiomers. These patents are crucial for Pharmaceutical Lifecycle Management, extending a drug's market exclusivity.

2
New cards

Chiral Switch

The process of developing and marketing a single, therapeutically active enantiomer from a chiral drug that was previously available as a racemate (a 50/50 mixture of enantiomers). This often offers improved efficacy or reduced side effects.

3
New cards

Enantiomer Patent

A specific type of patent that claims a single enantiomer of a chiral compound, which was initially protected by a broader patent covering the racemic mixture. This strategy can extend intellectual property protection for a previously established drug.

4
New cards

Evergreening

A controversial business strategy in the pharmaceutical industry, often viewed pejoratively, where companies attempt to extend the duration of patent protection for a drug. This is typically achieved by making minor modifications or filing new patents on secondary aspects, aiming to delay generic competition and maintain market exclusivity.

5
New cards

Teaching Away

A legal defense used to argue against a claim of obviousness in patent law. It asserts that prior art (existing knowledge or inventions) would have actively discouraged a 'person skilled in the art' from pursuing the inventor's particular approach, indicating that the successful outcome was unexpected and therefore non-obvious.

6
New cards

Obvious to Try

A legal criterion for determining prima facie obviousness in patent law. If a 'person skilled in the art' would have been motivated to attempt a particular solution or path with a reasonable expectation of success based on prior art, the resulting invention may be deemed obvious and unpatentable.

7
New cards

Unexpected Results

A strong argument used to rebut an obviousness claim in patent law. It demonstrates that the claimed invention exhibits properties, advantages, or outcomes that are surprisingly superior or different from what a 'person skilled in the art' would have predicted based on existing prior art, thereby proving its nonobviousness.

8
New cards

Person Skilled in the Art (PSITA)

A hypothetical individual in patent law, representing a practitioner in the relevant technical field. This person is presumed to possess average knowledge, ordinary ability, and is aware of all common general knowledge pertinent to the field at the relevant filing or priority date of the patent application.

9
New cards

Pharmaceutical Lifecycle Management (LCM)

A comprehensive strategic approach undertaken by pharmaceutical companies to manage a drug's market presence and profitability throughout its lifespan. This often involves developing and securing various secondary pharmaceutical patents (e.g., for new uses, formulations, or dosage forms) to extend market exclusivity and maintain revenue beyond the primary patent's expiry.

10
New cards

Product Hopping

A business strategy employed by pharmaceutical manufacturers, often considered controversial. It involves discontinuing the marketing of a drug that is nearing the end of its patent protection while simultaneously introducing and promoting a new, slightly modified, but patent-protected formulation of the same drug. The goal is to compel patients and prescribers to switch to the new version, thus circumventing generic competition and maintaining market exclusivity.

11
New cards

Me-Too Drugs

Drugs that belong to the same chemical class as one already on the market. This term is sometimes used pejoratively by critics of secondary pharmaceutical patents, suggesting that these drugs offer minimal therapeutic advancement over existing options and are primarily developed to secure new patent protection rather than addressing unmet medical needs.

12
New cards

Racemate

A mixture containing equal amounts (50/50) of the two enantiomers (mirror-image forms) of a chiral drug. Often, only one enantiomer is therapeutically active, making racemates a target for 'chiral switches' to develop single-enantiomer drugs.

13
New cards

DFT Computational Studies

Modern Density Functional Theory (DFT) computational analyses are advanced scientific methods used to predict and verify chemical and physical properties. In drug development, they can be employed to calculate energy barriers and understand molecular stability, for example, to verify predictions about the instability of a chemical species under specific conditions important for patentability.

14
New cards

Plausibility (Patent Law)

A fundamental requirement for a patent's sufficiency, as established notably in cases like Lyrica. It mandates that the patent specification must provide a credible reason or disclosure to support the implied assertion of efficacy, utility, or any technical effect claimed by the invention. Without this, the patent may be deemed insufficient.

15
New cards

Dosage Patent

A specific type of Secondary Pharmaceutical Patent that protects a novel and inventive dosage regimen for an existing drug. This could involve new dosages, administration frequencies, or patient populations, provided these innovations demonstrate a significant technical effect and meet patentability criteria.

16
New cards

Selection Patent

A type of Secondary Pharmaceutical Patent that protects a new selection (e.g., a specific subset of compounds from a broader class) that was previously disclosed but not specifically claimed. To be patentable, the selection must not be arbitrary and must be justified by a hitherto unknown and inventive technical effect or advantage.

17
New cards

Improvement Patent

A type of Secondary Pharmaceutical Patent that claims an enhancement or modification to an invention already protected by an earlier patent. For this patent to be valid, it must demonstrate a 'further inventive step' or a significant, non-obvious technical improvement over the claims of the original patent.

18
New cards

Why is 'Evergreening' considered controversial in the pharmaceutical industry?

It is widely criticized as an abuse of the patent system. Its primary aim is to illegitimately extend drug monopolies, thereby delaying the entry of more affordable generic versions, which limits market competition and can keep drug prices high.

19
New cards

What is the primary objective behind 'Product Hopping' as a business strategy?

The main objective is to safeguard a drug manufacturer's market exclusivity. By phasing out an older drug nearing patent expiry and introducing a new, slightly altered but patent-protected formulation, companies aim to compel patients and prescribers to switch, thereby blocking generic competition and preserving their market share.

20
New cards

How are 'Me-Too Drugs' sometimes viewed by critics of secondary pharmaceutical patents?

Critics often view 'Me-Too Drugs' pejoratively, arguing that they offer minimal or no significant therapeutic advantages over existing medications. They are seen as a strategy primarily focused on securing new patent protection and extending market exclusivity rather than providing genuine innovation or addressing substantive medical needs.