331 Exam 2 Terms

5.0(1)
studied byStudied by 6 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/56

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

57 Terms

1
New cards
Bilateral Contract
Mutual promises by each party to do some future act; exchange of promises
2
New cards
Unilateral Contracts
when one party makes a promise in exchange for another person performing an action; exchange of promise for an act - involves subsequent contingent action
3
New cards
offer
proposal to make a contract. it is a promise conditional on a return promise or forbearance given by the offerce.

terms of the offer must be __**definite and unambigiuous**__
4
New cards
conditions for legally effective offer
definite/unambigious proposal

made with the intent to contract

communicated to the offeree
5
New cards
Offer termination
revocation by offeror (made before acceptance)

lapse of time

subsequent illegality

destruction of the subject matter

death

rejection

counteroffer
6
New cards
option contract
an offeror is bound to hold an offer open for a period of time. consideration is necessary in return for the promiser to hold the offer open
7
New cards
acceptance
agreement of the offeree to be bound by the terms of the offer
8
New cards
Conditions for Acceptance
unconditional consent

open offer by the offeree only

communicated to the offeror

act of manifestation of intention to contract
9
New cards
act of manifestation of intention to contract
silence or inaction

promise

act or forbearance of an act
10
New cards
consideration
That which is bargained for and given in exchange for another’s promise, usually consisting of the performance of an act or promise to do an act, or to refrain from doing an act or to give up a right.

“Is it enough that something is promised, done, forbone or suffered by the party to which the promise is made”

for one dollar and other good and valuable considerations the paties herby agreee
11
New cards
Meeting of the minds
each party fully understands their commitment
12
New cards
Duress
coercion, loss of free will, resulting in a consent to be bound by a contract
13
New cards
restitution
equitable remedy, restoring of property or a right to a person who has been unjustly deprived of it
14
New cards
Infliction of emotional distress
every person has a right to not be subjected to severe emotional distress caused by someone elses conduct.

tortfeasor’s conduct intentionally and recklessly subjects someone to emotional distress
15
New cards
Invasion of privacy
**intrusion** upon solitude

**public disclosure** of private facts

painting plaintiff in **false light**

**appropriation** of likeness for defendant’s advantage
16
New cards
negligence
unintentional failure to live up to the community’s idea of reasonable care, not based on moral fault
17
New cards
Common Law Negligence Claim

1. Did D owe a duty to P?
2. Did P breach that duty?
3. Was there an injury to P?
4. legal causation between breach and injury?
18
New cards
Negligence Per Se Claim
where the action causing the plaintiff’s injury involved violation of a statute concerned with public safety.

Only jury issues are then proximate cause and damagnes
19
New cards
Proximate Cause
something that produces a result, without which the result could not have occurred. Any original event that, in natural unbroken sequence, produces a particular foreseeable result, without which the result would not have occurred.
20
New cards
malpractice
professional negligence
21
New cards
medical malpractice
allegation that a physician has breached a contract or been professional negligent in diagnosing or treating a patient
22
New cards
Causation in Fact/ But for test
causal connection does exist between the defendant act and plaintiffs damage
23
New cards
foreseeability
an individual is responsible in negligence only for the consequences that are reasonable foreseeable. defendant is not liable for causing injuries so remotely linked to alleged negligent conduct
24
New cards
contributory negligence
a defense when injured person proximately contributed to their injuries by their own negligence. Based on the idea that the plaintiff is held ot the same standard of care as defendant.
25
New cards
Assumption of Risk
defense for negligence when plaintiff had knowledge of the risk and made under free choice to expose themself to it
26
New cards
comparative negligence
a negligent plaintiff may be able to recover a portion of the cost of an injury; comparing the negligence of the plaintiff with that of the defendant; divides the damages between the parties by reducing the plaintiff’s damages in proportion to the extent of that person’s contributory fault. 
27
New cards
standard of care
ordinary care such as a resonably prudent person would exercise under the circumstances
28
New cards
invitee
either a public invitee or a business visitor (business invitee). A public invitee is a member of the public who enters land for the purpose for which the land is held open to the public (ex.person enters bank for meeting). A business visitor enters land for a purpose directly or indirectly connected with business dealings with the possessor of the land (ex. plumber).
29
New cards
tresspasser
one who enters and remains on the land of another without the possessor’s express or implied consent
30
New cards
Duty of Care to Trespassers
possessors of land are not liable to trespassers for physical harm caused by the owners’ failure either to exercise reasonable care to make their land safe for the trespasser’s reception or to carry on the owners’ activities so as not to endanger them. The only duty that is owed to a trespasser by an occupier of land is to refrain from willful or wanton misconduct.

Possible expectation if child whose presence is foreseeable or adult who habitually intrudes on a limited area 
31
New cards
Licensee
One who enters or remains on land by virtue of the possessor’s implied or express consent (ex. Social guests, police)
32
New cards
Tort
wrongful act, not involving a breach of an agreement, for which a __**civil**__ action may be maintained
33
New cards
civil wrongs
the failure to exercise reasonable care

intentional interference with one’s person, reputation, or property

liability without fault
34
New cards
intentional torts
willful misconduct or intentional wrongdoing
35
New cards
contributory negligence
failure of an injured party to act prudently, considered to be a contributory factor in the injury suffered, and sometimes reducing the amount recovered from the defendant
36
New cards
assault
reasonable fear of an intentional, imminent, unconsented, harmful or offensive touching by another person
37
New cards
battery
an unpermitted, unprivileged, intentional contact with another’s person; includes contact that is actually harmful, as well as conduct that is merely offensive
38
New cards
ejectment
when a trespasser secures full possession of the land and the owner brings an action to regain possession as well as damages for unlawful retention
39
New cards
replevin
an action used to recover possession of personal property wrongfully taken
40
New cards
compensatory damages
Damages awarded to compensate the plaintiff for actual monetary losses resulting from the defendant’s conduct

objective is to put plaintiff in the same financial position as existed before the tort
41
New cards
rule of mitigation or avoidable-harm doctrine
prevents recovery for damages that could have been foreseen and avoided by reasonable effort without risk, expense, or humiliation

an injured person must make a reasonable effort to avoid or minimize damages
42
New cards
general damages
natural and necessary result of the wrongful act or omission and can be expected to accompany the injury

ex. battery: mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, etc
43
New cards
benefit rule
defendant’s misconduct causes damages but also operates to confer some benefit on the plaintiff, then the plaintiff’s damage claim may be dismissed by the amount of benefit they received
44
New cards
special damages
awarded for injuries that arise from special circumstances of the wrong

medical or hospital bills
45
New cards
liquidated damages
when parties agree in advance about compensation to be paid for loss in event of a breach, a liquidated damage is this amount

* Damages in case of breach are uncertain or difficult to compute
* Parties have agreed in advance to liquidate on the damages
* The amount agreed on is reasonable and not disproportionate to the probable loss
46
New cards
nominal damages
awarded when there is a breach of an agreement or an invasion of a right but no evidence of specific harm. Usually 1 dollar, no compensation to be had

to prove the plaintiff is “right”

ex. someone trespasses but does no damage
47
New cards
punitive damages
awarded to plaintiff beyond the compensatory amount; additional damages for a civil wrong and not a substitute for criminal punishment

Goal is a punishment to tortfesor
48
New cards
injunction
type of equitable remedy in the form of a judicial order that directs defendant to act or refrain from act in a certain way

mandatory

prohibitory
49
New cards
permanent injunction
issued after a full opportunity to present evidence
50
New cards
preliminary injunction
granted as an emergency measure before a full hearing, done with notice to defendant
51
New cards
temporary restraining order
granted without notice to defendant, trial judge has only heard plaintiff’s side because of potential for abuse of the plaintiff.
52
New cards
equitable remedy
something like declaratory judgment, or an injunction
53
New cards
equitable doctrine of laches
used in some circumstances to deny a plaintiff equitable remedy if the delay is unreasonable and has unfairly prejudiced the defendant
54
New cards
Detrimental Reliance
when a party relies on a bid or proposal by another to their own detriment

* defendant’s mistake cannot be so __**obvious**__
* a legal principle is used to force one party to perfor its obligations on the grounds that __**nonperformance**__ would leave the other party in a prejudicial position
55
New cards
Common Law negligence damages
Damages are appropriate if a __r____**easonably prudent person**__ would have foreseen or could have foreseen that their actions would likely injure another person
56
New cards
burden of evidence in a civil trial
on preponderance of the evidence
57
New cards
Reasons a contract may be null and void
illegality

someone was not in a good mental state (intoxiated)

duress

fundamental errors - mistake in salary or something