Strathmore University Law School – Elements of Crime (Actus Reus, Mens Rea, Strict Liability)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/32

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering Actus Reus, Mens Rea, omissions, possession, strict liability, and related case law from the lecture notes.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

33 Terms

1
New cards

Actus Reus

The physical elements of a crime—the doing part; includes conduct, circumstances, consequences, and causation; and must be voluntary (an act or omission).

2
New cards

Conduct

The physical behavior of the accused as a component of Actus Reus.

3
New cards

Circumstances

The context or conditions under which conduct occurs, a component of Actus Reus.

4
New cards

Consequences

The outcome or result of conduct, a component of Actus Reus.

5
New cards

Causation

Harm caused by the act/omission must be traceable to the offender.

6
New cards

Voluntary Act or Omission

Actus Reus requires a voluntary act or omission; involuntary actions do not satisfy the actus reus.

7
New cards

Commission

The carrying out of a positive action or conduct; manifestation of Actus Reus (e.g., abetting, damaging, forging).

8
New cards

Omission

Failure to act when there is a legal duty to do so; can incur liability.

9
New cards

Statutory Duties

Duties imposed by statute requiring action.

10
New cards

Contractual Duties

Duties arising from agreements or contracts.

11
New cards

Special Relationships

Duties arising from relationships such as parent-child or doctor-patient.

12
New cards

Assumed Duties

Duties arising when someone voluntarily assumes a duty of care.

13
New cards

Events or States of Affairs

Crimes defined by the existence of particular circumstances or states rather than actions.

14
New cards

Possession Crimes

Crimes based on mere possession; proof requires custody and control, not mere physical possession.

15
New cards

Actual Possession

Physical custody of the item in question.

16
New cards

Constructive Possession

Power of control over an item, even without physical hold.

17
New cards

Status Offenses

Crimes defined by being in a certain status or situation.

18
New cards

Mens Rea

Defendant's state of mind at the time of the actus reus; determines culpability and levels of liability.

19
New cards

Direct Intention

The specific aim or objective to bring about a particular consequence.

20
New cards

Oblique Intention

Consequence not the primary aim but foreseen as virtually certain.

21
New cards

Recklessness

Awareness of a substantial risk and unjustifiably taking it; acts with rashness.

22
New cards

Negligence

Failure to foresee consequences a reasonable person would have anticipated; judged by reasonableness.

23
New cards

Knowledge

Knowledge of circumstances required for certain offenses; can be actual, constructive, or second-degree.

24
New cards

Actual Knowledge

Direct knowledge of facts or circumstances.

25
New cards

Constructive Knowledge

Knowledge one ought to have; knowledge inferred from circumstances.

26
New cards

Second-Degree Knowledge

Shuts eyes to obvious means of knowledge; awareness is limited.

27
New cards

Strict Liability

Offences that do not require mens rea; conviction based on actus reus alone.

28
New cards

Presumption of Mens Rea

In general, mens rea is presumed unless the statute dispenses with it.

29
New cards

Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea

Latin for: the act does not make one guilty unless the mind is guilty; need both actus reus and mens rea.

30
New cards

Emma d/o Mwaluko v Republic

Case stating that in a criminal charge, actus reus and mens rea must be proved.

31
New cards

Okwisia v Republic

Recklessness example: driving a lorry without lights deemed deliberate misconduct or recklessness.

32
New cards

Section 261 of the Penal Code

Statutory provision illustrating that knowledge is required for certain offenses (e.g., possession or prohibiting items).

33
New cards

Alli s/o Mzee v R

Case illustrating knowledge is required for offenses involving permitting prohibited items.